Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.Lakshmanan vs State Of Tamil Nadu
2022 Latest Caselaw 339 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 339 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2022

Madras High Court
P.Lakshmanan vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 6 January, 2022
                                                                           W.P(MD)No.20360 of 2021

                                  BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  Dated: 06.01.2022

                                                         CORAM:

                                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                                W.P(MD)No.20360 of 2021
                                                          and
                                               W.M.P(MD)No.17008 of 2021


                P.Lakshmanan                                                  ... Petitioner

                                                         Vs

                1.State of Tamil Nadu,
                  Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government,
                  Department of Finance,
                  Fort St.George,
                  Chennai – 9.

                2.The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts
                     / Joint Director,
                  3rd Floor, Veterinary Hospital Campus,
                  No.571, Nandhanam, Anna Salai,
                  Chennai – 600 035.

                3.The District Level Empowered Committee,
                  Rep. by the District Collector,
                  Pudukottai District.

                4.The Senior Divisional Manager,
                  United India Insurance Company,
                  Divisional Office VI,
                  5th Floor, PLA Rathna Tower,
                  212, Anna Salai, Chennai – 6.                          ... Respondents

                PRAYER:            Writ   Petition    filed     under   Article     226   of   the
                Constitution              of     India    for     issuance     of     writ     of

                1/12



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 W.P(MD)No.20360 of 2021

                Certiorarified            Mandamus,        to   call    for     the   entire   records
                relating           to     the       impugned      proceedings         in    O.Mus.No.
                20013/Pu.Ma.Ka.Thi-3/2021, dated 11.08.2021 on the file of
                the second respondent and quash the same and further direct
                the        respondents         to   reimburse       the    medical      expenses     of
                Rs.1,38,793/- payable to the petitioner with interest at
                the rate of 12% per annum for the delayed payment in the
                light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Shiva
                Kant Jha v. Union of India, reported in AIR 2018 SC 1975
                and the judgment of the Hon'ble Madurai Bench of Madras
                High Court in W.P.(MD)No.13429 of 2013, dated 28.05.2019,
                within a stipulated time limit.
                                  For Petitioner           : Mr.T.Aswin Rajasimman
                                  For Respondent           : Mr.S.Saji Bino,
                                  Nos.1 to 3                      Special Government Pleader
                                  For Respondent           : Mr.A.Shajahan
                                  No.4
                                                            ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking for

reimbursement of Rs.1,38,793/- spent towards Covid-19

treatment for the petitioner, who is working as Headmaster

in Government Higher Secondary Schol, Avoor, Pudukottai

District.

2.The grievance of the petitioner is that the

petitioner is a subscriber to the Government of Tamil Nadu

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20360 of 2021

New Health Insurance Scheme. He has incurred a sum of

Rs.1,38,793/- towards his Covid-19 treatment expense in the

month of October 2020. The petitioner sent a representation

to the respondents seeking reimbursement of the said

amount. But the claim of the petitioner has been rejected

vide impugned order.

3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner experienced symptoms of Covid-19 and got

admitted in Thilagavathy Hospital, Kamaraj Nagar, Airport,

Trichy, on 09.10.2020, which is closer to his residence. He

took treatment in the said Hospital till 16.10.2020.

Totally he has incurred a sum of Rs.1,38,793/-. The learned

Counsel for the petitioner has also relied on the medical

documents for having taken treatment for Covid-19 at

Thilagavathy Hospital, Kamaraj Nagar, Airport, Trichy.

4.Mr.A.Shajahan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for

the fourth respondent / Insurance Company submitted that

the petitioner has taken treatment in a non-network

hospital for a non-critical issue. He also placed his

reliance in Clause 4(iv)(vi) of G.O.Ms.No.280, Finance

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20360 of 2021

[Salaries] Department, dated 24.06.2020, which reads as

follows:

“4.(iv)(vi) Government Employees / Pensioners, who have already taken treatment for Non – critical COVID care in empanelled Hospitals from 01.03.2020 to till date are directed to submit their claims for reimbursements by appealing to the Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts shall recommend to the United India Insurance Company Limited to reimburse the payment from the Corpus fund provided by the Government.”

5.The learned Counsel has also relied on the letter of

the Additional Chief Secretary, Finance (Salaries)

Department in letter No.36962/Finance(Salaries)/2020, dated

11.11.2020 and submits that non critical Covid-19 claims as

per G.O.Ms.No.280, Finance (Salaries) Department, dated

24.06.2020 can be made only in empaneled and Covid

authorised hospital and critical care, which is covered in

New Health Insurance Scheme, shall be covered as per

existing contract. Therefore, the petitioner is not

entitled for the claim.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20360 of 2021

6.Heard the learned Counsel appearing on either side

and perused the documents placed on record.

7.During the month of October 2020, since the

petitioner experienced the symptoms of Covid-19, he was

admitted in Thilagavathy Hospital, Trichy, wherein he was

diagnosed with Covid-19 and was provided treatment.

The petitioner based on the medical documents and receipts

issued by the hospital, made an application seeking

reimbursement. The application finally landed before the

second respondent, who rejected the claim of the petitioner

stating that the claim of the petitioner falls under the

category of Non-critical at Non-Empanelled hospital and his

claim is not covered under the National Health Insurance

Scheme.

8.The National Health Insurance Scheme for Employees

and Pensioners / Family Pensioners was introduced in the

year 2008 and subsequently it was extended from time to

time by respective Government Orders. This Health Insurance

Scheme is being implemented with an object of 'cashless

treatment' to the Government Employees, Pensioners and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20360 of 2021

Family Pensioners. The agreement was entered into between

the Government and the United India Insurance Company

Limited in the year 2016 for a period of four years, which

has been subsequently renewed in the year 2018 and of late,

renewed in the year 2021.

9.The Government has published a list of approved

treatments and surgeries and a list of empaneled network

hospitals. The employee, who takes treatment for a

particular illness in a particular hospital, mentioned in

the list is entitled for cashless treatment subject to the

ceiling limit and the Insurance Company shall directly make

payment to the hospital.

10.Covid-19 is not mentioned in the said list of

illness. The Government considering the same, vide

G.O.Ms.No.280, Finance [Salaries] Department, dated

24.06.2020, has included new packages for treatment of

critical and non-critical care for Covid-19 positive cases

under New Health Insurance Scheme for Employees and

Pensioners and also fixed the ceiling rate for payment to

the private hospitals. As per the said Government Order,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20360 of 2021

for critical care, the Insurance Company shall make

payments to the empaneled hospitals as per the recommended

rates in para(i) and for non critical care, the Government

has authorised the Insurance Company Limited to form two

separate corpus funds, viz., (i) Corpus Fund for Covid-19

treatment in empanelled hospitals under New Health

Insurance Scheme for Employees – Rs.5 Crore and (ii) Corpus

Fund for Covid-19 treatment in empanelled hospitals under

New Health Insurance Scheme for Pensioners/ Family

Pensioners – Rs.2.5 Crore. The Insurance company shall

make payments for Covid-19 treatment as per the rates

recommended in the Government Order and the Government

sanctioned a sum of Rs.5 Crore and Rs.2.5 Crore for New

Health Insurance Scheme towards contribution to the two

corpus funds. This Government Orders cover both critical

care and non critical care. The Government has also

sanctioned two corpus funds for making payment to the

hospitals by the Insurance Company.

11.The claim of the petitioner has been rejected on the

ground that non-critical and non-network hospital, i.e.,

the petitioner has taken treatment for

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20360 of 2021

non-critical issue in a non-network hospital and therefore,

he is not entitled for reimbursement.

12.Covid-19, a new form of virus, which this century is

facing as pandemic for the past two years. There is no

prescribed medicine or treatment for curing covid-19.

The research as of now shows that the virus enters the

lungs of the body, multiples in number and thereby affects

the entire respiratory system at any point of time, leading

to asphyxia and several other disorders, which require

immediate attention and immediate health care. The entire

world has seen the huge number of persons contracted with

Covid-19 and even now the number is huge. Most of the

hospitals were flooded with covid-19 patients, requiring

immediate treatment. Even there were scenes, patients

waiting in front of the hospitals for want of beds for

being admitted. We have also come across the deaths due to

shortage of beds, shortage of oxygen and due to other

reasons being reported daily in medias.

13.The petitioner has enrolled in the New Health

Insurance Scheme for Employees and has been paying

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20360 of 2021

subscription every months. The petitioner experienced the

covid-19 symptoms, immediately admitted in a nearby

Hospital, diagnosed with Covid-19 and was provided

treatment.

14.When such being the nature of the illness,

it is not acceptable to state that Covid-19 cannot be

termed as critical care. Therefore, rejecting the claim on

the ground of non-critical care cannot be sustained.

Further, a Covid-19 contracted person, who is battling for

life, shall not be in a position to search for a network

hospital / empaneled hospital leisurely for taking

treatment. Therefore, the reason of non-network hospital

cannot be accepted.

15.The Government vide G.O.Ms.No.280, Finance

[Salaries] Department, dated 24.06.2020, has included new

packages for treatment of critical and non-critical care

for Covid-19 positive cases under New Health Insurance

Scheme for Employees and Pensioners and also fixed the

ceiling rate for payment to the private hospitals by

sanctioning two carpus funds.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20360 of 2021

16.It is an admitted fact that the petitioner has

contracted covid-19 and taken treatment. The Insurance

Company has not disputed the same.

17.In the light of the above discussion, the impugned

rejection order is set aside and this writ petition is

disposed of, with a direction to the fourth respondent /

United India Insurance Company to consider the case of the

petitioner and make payment as directed in G.O.Ms.No.280,

Finance [Salaries] Department, dated 24.06.2020, within a

period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy

of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.



                                                                                06.01.2022
                Index    : Yes / No
                Internet : Yes / No

                gk

                Note:

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20360 of 2021

To

1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Finance, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.

2.The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts / Joint Director, 3rd Floor, Veterinary Hospital Campus, No.571, Nandhanam, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 035.

3.The District Collector, District Level Empowered Committee, Pudukottai District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.20360 of 2021

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

gk

W.P(MD)No.20360 of 2021

06.01.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter