Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Colonel C.M.Unnithan vs Government Of India
2022 Latest Caselaw 155 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 155 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2022

Madras High Court
Colonel C.M.Unnithan vs Government Of India on 4 January, 2022
                                                                          W.P.No.19480 of 2020



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED:    04.01.2022

                                                    CORAM :

                                   THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI,
                                             ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                       AND
                                    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
                                             W.P.No.19480 of 2020
                     Colonel C.M.Unnithan                                  .. Petitioner

                                                        vs

                     1. Government of India,
                        Through Secretary, Ministry of Housing
                          and Urban Affairs, Nirman Bhawan,
                        'C' Wing, Dr.Maulana Azad Road,
                        New Delhi 110 011.

                     2. Government of Tamil Nadu,
                        Through Secretary, Housing and Urban
                         Development Department,
                        Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.                      .. Respondents


                     Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
                     issuance of a Writ of Declaration Declaring that Rule 2 (h) of Tamil
                     nadu Real Estate (Regulation and Development ) rules 2017 G.O.Ms.
                     No. 112 Housing and Urban Development UD1(2) 22nd June 2017
                     issued by the 2nd respondent is inter alia ultra virus inconsistent non
                     conformity to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development Act 2016
                     and the same is liable to be quashed.




                     ___________
                     Page 1 of 5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               W.P.No.19480 of 2020



                                  For the Petitioner           :     Mr.R.Ramasubramaniam
                     Raja

                                  For the Respondents    :     Mr.T.V.Krishnamachari
                                                               Stdg. Counsel for R-1

                                                         :     Mr.C.Harsharaj,
                                                               Addl. G.P. for R-2

                                                             *****

                                                             ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of

the judgment in the case of Subashini Thulasiram vs SPR & RG

Constructions Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2020 SCC Online Mad 20120,

the petitioner is not required to press the writ petition for challenge

to the validity of Rule 2(h) of the Tamil Nadu Real Estate (Regulation

and Development) Rules, 2017. It is especially in the light of the

finding recorded by the Division Bench in the case supra.

2. A reference of para 30 of the said judgment has been given

with the prayer that the petition may be governed by it and if the

direction aforesaid is given, the petitioner is not required to press the

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.19480 of 2020

prayer made in the writ petition for challenge to the constitutional

validity of Rule 2(h)(ii) of the Rules of 2017.

3. The learned Government Pleader has no objection to it. It is,

however, stated that the issue is already considered by the RERA in

favour of the petitioner after taking note of Rule 2(h)(ii) of the RERA

Rules and Section 3 of the RERA Act. It may be true that the

challenge before the High Court against the order passed by the

RERA authority sustain, but it was not on the merit of the case but in

view of the violation of principle of natural justice. The petitioner did

not implead promoter as party respondent. The Tribunal otherwise

did not accept the view expressed by the Regulatory Authority for

exemption from registration. The RERA has already decided the issue

in favour of the petitioner on the subject requiring registration of the

project.

4. We have considered the submissions made by the parties

and find that in the light of the finding recorded by this Court in para

30 in the case of Subashini Thulasiram (supra), the learned counsel

for the petitioner is not pressing the writ petition for challenge to the

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.19480 of 2020

constitutional validity of Rule 2(h) of the Rules of 2017.

However, we dispose of the writ petition by governing it by the

observation made in para 30 of the judgment supra and otherwise the

matter is pending consideration in regard to the issue of requirement

of registration, it would be decided by the authority after considering

the facts of the case and judgment in the case supra. No costs.

                                                                (M.N.B., ACJ.)        (P.D.A., J.)
                                                                        04.01.2022
                     Index : Yes/No

                     sra

                     To:

                     1. The Secretary,
                        Government of India,

Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Nirman Bhawan, 'C' Wing, Dr.Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi 110 011.

2. The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.19480 of 2020

M.N.BHANDARI, ACJ.

AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.

(sra)

W.P.No.19480 of 2020

04.01.2022

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter