Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1176 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2022
CRP.NPD.No.2768/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
CRP.NPD.No.2768/2021 & CMP.No.20167/2021
(Heard through Video Conferencing)
K.V.Lakshmipathy (Died)
1.K.V.Meera
2.Jayanthi
3.K.V.Saroja
4.N.N.Savithri
5.Ethiraj ... Petitioners
Vs
1.J.Senthamizh Selvi
N.Kasi Viswanathan (Died) ... Respondents
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed Article 227 of the Constitution of India to
set aside the docket order dated 23.10.2021 made in E.P.No.7/2011 in
O.S.No.6871/1990, passed by the Principal District Munsif Court,
Thiruvallur.
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Prabhakaran
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP.NPD.No.2768/2021
ORDER
(1) The challenge in this Revision is to the order passed during the course
of execution proceedings in E.P.No.7/2011 where the decree holder
seeks to execute the decree for permanent injunction by arresting and
detaining the judgment debtors complaining that they have, in
violation of the decree for permanent injunction, trespassed over the
Suit property.
(2) An objection was taken in the execution proceedings to the effect that
larger extent of property has been acquired by the Chennai
Metropolitan Development Authority [in short ''CMDA''] and the
CMDA has taken possession of the property and hence, the decree is
in executable. This very question was considered by the Court in
CMA.No.9/2019 and it was held that the acquisition of the larger
extent by CMDA has no bearing on the present execution
proceedings. The said order passed by the learned Additional District
Judge, Thiruvallur, was confirmed by this Court in
CRP.NPD.No.3237/2019. The very same question is sought to be re
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.NPD.No.2768/2021
agitated in this revision.
(3) I had in fact called for the Report from the officials regarding
possession of the property.
(4) The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development
Authority, has written to the Special Tahsildar stating that S.No.55/5
is outside the boundary of the Koyambedu Wholesale Market
Complex. I therefore do not see any merit in the revision.
(5) In the result, the Civil Revision fails and it is accordingly dismissed.
No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
25.01.2022
AP
Internet : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No
Speaking/Non Speaking
To
The Principal District Munsif,
Thiruvallur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.NPD.No.2768/2021
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
AP
CRP.NPD.No.2768/2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.NPD.No.2768/2021
25.01.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!