Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1775 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2022
S.A.No.1925 of 1999
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.02.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
S.A.No.1925 of 1999
Mahalakshmi ... Appellant/
Respondent/ Plaintiff
Vs.
1.Mukkaiah
2.Marriammal
3.Rengaraj
4.Kandavelammal
5.Subbulakshmi
6.Pandi
7.Sakthi
8.Murugan
9.Petchiammal
10.Muthulashmi ... Respondents/
Appellants/Defendants
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil
Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 14.10.1998
passed in A.S.No.324 of 1996 on the file of Sub Court, Virudhunagar
setting aside the judgment and decree dated 05.08.1996 passed in
O.S.No.213 of 1992 on the file of District Munsif Court, Aruppukkottai.
For Appellant : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.S.B.Chakkaravarthy
for R3
No appearance
for R1,R5 to R8
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.1925 of 1999
JUDGMENT
The present second appeal was listed for final hearing originally
on 16.11.2021. The learned counsel for the appellant wanted time to
restore the appeal as against R2, R9 and R10 and also to take steps to
implead the legal heirs of the 4th respondent. Thereafter, it was adjourned
to 24.11.2021, again on 26.11.2021. The learned counsel for the
appellant sought time. Then, it was posted on 15.12.2021. Again the
learned counsel for the appellant sought time on 05.01.2021. The matter
was adjourned to 31.01.2022. On the said date, there was no
representation on the side of the appellant and on 02.02.2022, when the
matter was listed there was no representation on the side of the appellant.
Hence, the matter is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even
today, there is no representation on the side of the appellant. The Second
Appeal stands dismissed for default. No costs.
03.02.2022
gbg
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.1925 of 1999
Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
To
1.The Sub Court, Virudhunagar.
2.The District Munsif Court, Aruppukkottai.
3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.1925 of 1999
R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.
gbg
Order made in S.A.No.1925 of 1999
Dated:
03.02.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!