Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1598 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2022
S.A.No.32 of 2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
S.A.No.32 of 2002
and C.M.P.Nos.9322 to 9324 of 2005
(Through Video Conference)
1) Ayiammal (died)
2) Saraswathi
3) Kamalam ... Appellants
Vs.
1) Kaliappan
2) Senkaliappan
3) Narayanan ... Defendants 2 to 4 /
Respondents 2 to 4/
Respondents 1 to 3
4) Poovathal
5) Velusamy
6) Swaminathan
7) Selvaraj
____________
Page No.1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.32 of 2002
8) Pappan ... Third parties /
Respondents 5 to 9/
Respondents 4 to 8
9) Kaliammal
10) Krishnan
11) Rukmani
12) Minor Sathish
* Appellants 2 and 3 and RR 9 to 12 brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased
sole appellant vide order of Court dated 13.07.2010 made in C.M.P.No.9324 of 2005.
PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed against the orders dated 28.02.2001 in
A.S.No.158/97 on the file of II Additional District Judge's Court,
Coimbatore confirming the Decree and Judgment dated 17.12.1996 in
O.S.No.602/89 on the file of III Additional District Munsif's Court,
Coimbatore.
For Appellants ... Ms.Kundavi for
Mr.C.R.Prasannan
For R-1 ... Died
For RR 2 - 4, 6, ... No Appearance
& 9 -12
For RR 5 to 8 ... M/s.Sarrabhauman Associates
******
JUDGMENT
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.Kundavi,
learned counsel representing on behalf of Mr.C.R.Prasannan, learned
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.32 of 2002
counsel on record for the appellants, made a submission that as per the
directions of this Court made in order dated 19.08.2021, steps have been
taken to implead the legal heirs of the deceased first respondent.
2. The learned counsel for the appellants further submitted that
inspite of the best efforts made by the learned counsel for the appellants,
the appellants have not responded and as a result, the learned counsel is
unable to get instructions from her client.
3. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the
appellants, this Second Appeal stands Dismissed for non-prosecution. No
costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
01.02.2022 Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order Index : Yes / No
sts
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.32 of 2002
J.NISHA BANU, J.,
sts
To:
1. The II Additional District Judge's Court, Coimbatore
2. The III Additional District Munsif's Court, Coimbatore.
3. The V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.
Judgment made in S.A.No.32 of 2002
Dated:
01.02.2022
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!