Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 18260 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2022
CRP(PD)(MD)No.2237 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
CRP(PD)(MD)No.2237 of 2022
Bibin Rajesh @ Pivin ... Petitioner
Vs
1.Leela Bai
2.Gopalan
3.Nagammal
4.Suresh Kumar
5.Selvi Sutheesh Kumari
6.Selvi Satheesh Kumari ... Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to
direct the Sub Court, Kuzhithurai to dispose the appeal suit in A.S.No.
36 of 2021 in a speedy manner within a time frame as fixed by this
Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar
For Respondent : No appearance
ORDER
This revision petition is filed seeking for a direction to the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(PD)(MD)No.2237 of 2022
learned Sub Judge, Kuzhithurai to dispose of the appeal suit in A.S.No.
36 of 2021 in a time bound manner.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that the first respondent filed a claim petition in EA.No. 1 of 2021,
under Order 21 Rule 97 of Civil Procedure Code before the Execution
Court in E.P.No.42 of 2019 and the same was dismissed by the Court by
order dated 13.11.2021, as against which, the first respondent preferred
an appeal suit in A.S.No.36 of 2021 before the Sub Court, Kuzhithurai
on 16.12.2021, wherein, both side arguments have been advanced in the
month of February, 2022 itself and thereafter the appeal was posted for
judgment on 02.03.2022. Even then,the judgment has not been passed
by the first Appellate Court. The grievance of the petitioner is that
though he obtained a decree in the main suit in O.S.No.272 of 2004 in
the year 2005, he could not enjoy the fruits of the decree for the past 17
years and therefore, he seeks for an early disposal of A.S.No. 36 of
2021.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(PD)(MD)No.2237 of 2022
3.This Court considered the submissions of the learned
counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials placed on record.
4.Though notice was ordered to the second respondent and
his name also printed, there is no representation for the second
respondent.
5.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner as a
plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.272 of 2004 for the relief of declaration
and for permanent injunction and the suit was decreed in his favour
during 2005 itself. Challenging the same, appeals filed by the
respondents were also dismissed. Thereafter, the first respondent filed a
claim petition in EA.No.1 of 2021, under Order 21 Rule 97 of Civil
Procedure Code before the Execution Court in E.P.No.42 of 2019,
which was also dismissed. Challenging the same, the appeal suit in
A.S.No.36 of 2021 was preferred by the first respondent before the Sub
Court, Kuzhithurai on 16.12.2021, which is still pending. It is to be
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(PD)(MD)No.2237 of 2022
noted that the appeal suit has been argued in the month of March 2022
itself and it is now at the stage of pronouncement of orders.
6.Considering the fact that the suit was decreed in the year
2005 itself and the proceedings are delayed for years together, this Court
is inclined to dispose of this Civil Revision Petition with a direction to
the learned Sub Judge, Kuzhithurai to dispose of A.S.No.36 of 2021
within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order.
7.With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is
disposed of. No costs.
20.12.2022 Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. vrn
To
The Sub Court, Kuzhithurai
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(PD)(MD)No.2237 of 2022
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
vrn
Order made in CRP(PD)(MD)No.2237 of 2022
20.12.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!