Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14700 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2022
TCA.Nos.73, 74, 75 and 76 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.08.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
T.C.A.Nos. 73, 74, 75 and 76 of 2017
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Chennai .. Appellant in all appeals
Versus
M/s.Sify Communications Ltd.,
II Floor, Tidel Park,
Building 4, Canal Bank Road,
Taramani, Chennai 600 113. .. Respondent in all appeals
Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “B”
Bench, Chennai, dated 21.08.2015 passed in respective ITA.Nos.1229,1230,
1231 and 1232/Mds/2015 for the respective assessment years 2001-02, 2002-
03, 2004-05 and 2005-06.
For Appellant in all cases : Mr. T. Ravikumar
Standing counsel
For Respondent in all cases : Mr.R. Venkata Narayanan
for Mr.Vijayaraghavan
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
TCA.Nos.73, 74, 75 and 76 of 2017
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
These Tax Case Appeals have been filed by the appellant / revenue,
questioning the correctness of the order dated 21.08.2015 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “B” Bench, Chennai, in respective
ITA.Nos.1229, 1230, 1231 and 1232/Mds/2015 relating to respective
assessment years 2001-02, 2002-03, 2004-05 and 2005-06.
2. On 03.04.2017, the aforesaid tax case appeals were admitted on the
following substantial questions of law;
"1.Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case,
the Tribunal was right in holding that raising of invoices
does not result in earning of income?
2. Whether the Tribunal was right in deleting the
addition of unearned income?"
3. When the matters were taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the
2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
TCA.Nos.73, 74, 75 and 76 of 2017
Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in
these appeals are less than the threshold limit.
4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeals, wherein, the tax effect is said
to be less than the monetary limit imposed, are dismissed as withdrawn,
keeping open the substantial questions of law for determination in an
appropriate case. No costs.
[R.M.D,J.] [M.S.Q.,
J.]
22.08.2022
msr
Index : Yes / No
3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
TCA.Nos.73, 74, 75 and 76 of 2017
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
msr
To
1. The Income Tax Officer (OSD) Company Circle VI (3), Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-15, Chennai 600 034.
3. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “B” Bench, Chennai
T.C.A.Nos. 73, 74, 75 and 76 of 2017
22.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!