Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14046 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2022
T.C.A.Nos.417 & 418 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 05.08.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Tax Case Appeal Nos.417 and 418 of 2016
AND
C.M.P.No.8993 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai .. Appellant in both T.C.As
Vs.
M/s.Ravikumar Properties Pvt. Ltd.
1-C, Nandita Apartments
47, Thirumalai Pillai Street
T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017
PAN : AACCR8692L .. Respondent in both T.C.As
Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
against the order dated 30.06.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Chennai, in respective I.T.A.No.1435/Mds/2013 and
C.O.No.186/Mds/2013.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar
in both T.C.As Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : No appearance
in both T.C.As
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
T.C.A.Nos.417 & 418 of 2016
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
These tax case appeals have been filed by the appellant/Revenue, calling
in question the correctness of the order dated 30.06.2015 passed by the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Chennai, in respective
I.T.A.No.1435/Mds/2013 and C.O.No.186/Mds/2013, relating to the
assessment years 2009-10.
2. By order dated 05.07.2016, this Court admitted the aforesaid tax case
appeals on the following substantial question of law :
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,
the Tribunal was right in upholding the order of CIT(A) who
deleted the additions made by the AO u/s.14A r/w.Rule 8D of the
Income Tax Act?”
3. When these matters were taken up for consideration, the learned
counsel for the appellant/Revenue brought to the notice of this court the
Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, issued by the Central Board Direct
Taxes, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the
Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in
these appeals are less than the threshold limit.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/4
T.C.A.Nos.417 & 418 of 2016
4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel
for the appellant/Revenue, the present appeals, wherein, the tax effect is said to
be less than the monetary limit imposed, are dismissed as withdrawn, keeping
open the substantial question of law for determination in appropriate cases.
No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[R.M.D, J.] [M.S.Q, J.]
05.08.2022
Index : Yes / No
gya
To
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai
2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Company Circle V(3), Chennai
3.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-V
Chennai 600 034
4.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
'A' Bench, Chennai
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3/4
T.C.A.Nos.417 & 418 of 2016
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
gya
T.C.A.Nos.417 & 418 of 2016
05.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!