Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14031 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2022
T.C.A.No.93 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 05.08.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Tax Case Appeal No.93 of 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Road Safety Club Pvt. Ltd.
4 Lady Desikachari Road
Mylapore
Chennai 600 004 .. Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
against the order dated 25.06.2010 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.No.457/Mds/2010.
For Appellant : Mr.N.V.Balaji
For Respondent : No appearance
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
T.C.A.No.93 of 2014
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
This tax case appeal has been filed by the appellant/Revenue, calling in
question the correctness of the order dated 25.06.2010 passed by the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.No.457/Mds/2010,
relating to the assessment year 2006-07.
2. By order dated 09.07.2010, this Court admitted the aforesaid tax case
appeal on the following substantial questions of law :
“(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that only 1/8th of the membership fees received during the year should be treated as income of the assessee?
(ii) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in holding that the claim for deduction towards provision made for safety bonus payable to members who made no claim is allowable as deduction?
(iii) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in confirming the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) directing the assessing officer to allow claim for deduction of insurance premium paid over and above the sum debited to the profit and loss account?”
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.93 of 2014
3. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
for the appellant/Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
wherein, it is stipulated that appeal shall not be filed/pursued by the Department
before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in
this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel
for the appellant/Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax effect is said to
be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping
open the substantial questions of law for determination in an appropriate case.
No costs.
[R.M.D, J.] [M.S.Q, J.]
05.08.2022
Index : Yes / No
gya
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.93 of 2014
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
gya
To
1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle-V(4) Chennai
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Chennai
3.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' Bench Chennai Tax Case Appeal No.93 of 2014
05.08.2022 (2/2)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!