Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Oriental Hotels Limited vs The Assistant Commissioner Of ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 13647 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13647 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2022

Madras High Court
M/S. Oriental Hotels Limited vs The Assistant Commissioner Of ... on 1 August, 2022
                                                                        T.C.A.Nos.99 and 100 of 2010 and MP.No.1 of 2010


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 01.08.2022

                                                        CORAM :

                           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
                                              and
                         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

                                               T.C.A.Nos.99 and 100 of 2010
                                                           and
                                                     MP.No.1 of 2010


                M/s. Oriental Hotels Limited,
                37, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam,
                Chennai - 600 034.                                         ... Appellant in both appeals

                                                          Versus


                The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
                Company Circle - V,
                Chennai.                                                ... Respondent in both appeals



                          Appeals preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
                against the common order dated 30.01.2009 passed by the                             Income Tax
                Appellate          Tribunal,   “B” Bench,    Chennai,     in         I.T.A.Nos.1764               and
                1964/Mds/2002.


                For Appellant                   :     Mr.Subbaraya Aiyar

                For Respondent                  :     Mr.T.Ravikumar,
                                                      Senior Standing Counsel
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                1/5
                                                                     T.C.A.Nos.99 and 100 of 2010 and MP.No.1 of 2010




                                              COMMON JUDGMENT

                            (Judgment of this Court was delivered by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)


                          These tax case appeals have been filed by the appellant / assessee,

                challenging the common order dated 30.01.2009 passed by the Income Tax

                Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'B' Bench, relating to the assessment year 1999-

                2000.



                          2.By order dated 15.03.2010, this court admitted the aforesaid tax case

                appeals on the following substantial questions of law:



                TCA.No.99 of 2010:-

                                  “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,
                           the Tribunal was right in holding that the credit for tax deducted
                           at sources withdrawn by the assessing officer should not be
                           excluded from the total income?"


                TCA.No.100 of 2010:-
                                  "(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the
                           case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that interest
                           income earned on deposits, loans advanced to subsidiary
                           companies and inter corporate dividends which were in the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                2/5
                                                                     T.C.A.Nos.99 and 100 of 2010 and MP.No.1 of 2010


                           course of and for the purpose of business should be assessed as
                           income from 'other sources' and not under the head profits and
                           gains of the business?
                                  (ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the
                           case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that sales tax,
                           expenditure tax and luxury taxes collected from the customers
                           and paid to the Government should be included in the total
                           business receipts?
                                  (iii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the
                           case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the amount
                           received from British Airlines towards settlement of the bills of
                           stay of their crew should not be included in the foreign exchange
                           receipts of the Appellant for the purpose of computation of
                           deduction under section 80HHD?
                                  (iv) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the
                           case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that 15% of
                           foreign currency converted into Indian rupees by foreign
                           tourists for settling the bills are not relatable to services
                           rendered by the appellant and hence should be excluded from
                           the export turnover for the purpose of computing relief under
                           section 80HHD?"



                          3. When these matters were taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for

                the appellant sought permission of this Court to withdraw these Tax Case

                Appeals. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                3/5
                                                                  T.C.A.Nos.99 and 100 of 2010 and MP.No.1 of 2010




                          4. In view of the above submission and endorsement made by the learned

                counsel for the appellant, these Tax Case Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn,

                keeping open the substantial questions of law for determination in appropriate

                cases. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                   (R.M.D., J.)   (M.S.Q., J.)
                                                                         01.08.2022
                av

                Internet : Yes
                Index : Yes / No




                To


                1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
                   Chennai 'B' Bench,

                2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
                   Company Circle - V,
                   Chennai.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                4/5
                                  T.C.A.Nos.99 and 100 of 2010 and MP.No.1 of 2010


                                      R. MAHADEVAN, J.

and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

av

T.C.A.Nos.99 and 100 of 2010 and MP.No.1 of 2010

01.08.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter