Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.N.Balasubramanyam vs D.Devi @ Revathi
2022 Latest Caselaw 13574 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13574 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2022

Madras High Court
P.N.Balasubramanyam vs D.Devi @ Revathi on 1 August, 2022
                                                                            C.M.A.No.2417 of 2021

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 01.08.2022

                                                        CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
                                                   and
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR


                                              C.M.A.No.2417 of 2021
                                            and C.M.P.No.13763 of 2021

                  P.N.Balasubramanyam                                             ... Appellant

                                                         Vs.

                  D.Devi @ Revathi                                                ... Respondent



                  Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 of the

                  Family Court Act, 1984, against the fair and decreetal order dated 20.03.2021

                  made in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in O.P.No.2223 of 2019 on the file of the II

                  Additional Family Court, Chennai.



                                        For Appellant     : Mr.K.Govindan

                                        For Respondent    : M/s.A.Sumathy

                  1/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               C.M.A.No.2417 of 2021

                                                         JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by V.M.VELUMANI,J.]

The present appeal is filed challenging the order dated 20.03.2021 made

in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in O.P.No.2223 of 2019 on the file of the II Additional

Family Court, Chennai.

2.The appellant is husband and respondent is wife. The appellant filed

O.P.No.2223 of 2019 against the respondent for dissolution of marriage

conducted between the appellant and respondent on 16.06.2017. In the said

O.P., the respondent filed I.A.No.1 of 2019 seeking interim maintenance of

Rs.20,000/- per month and Rs.20,000/- towards litigation expenses. In the said

application, the respondent made various averments with regard to merits of

O.P., which are not relevant to decide the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

According to the respondent, the appellant is working as a Senior Manager

(Accounts) in M/s.Vector Private Limited Company and is earning a sum of

Rs.50,000/- per month. The respondent is unemployed and unable to maintain

herself and she is finding it difficult to maintain her day-to-day expenses. The

appellant failed to maintain the respondent and hence, filed the present petition.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2417 of 2021

3.The appellant, in the counter affidavit filed in the present application,

made various averments denying the averments of the respondent made in

respect of the main O.P. According to the appellant, he is not getting

Rs.50,000/- per month as alleged by the respondent. His monthly salary is only

Rs.33,700/-. Out of that amount, he has to pay Rs.11,700/- towards monthly

rent for the house, maintain his aged parents and has to spend money for their

medical expenses. The respondent is working in M/s.D4E Network India

Private Limited and is earning a sum of Rs.19,000/- per month, which she

admitted in the counselling conducted in the main O.P. In view of the same, the

respondent is not entitled for any interim maintenance and prayed for dismissal

of I.A.

4.The learned Judge considering the averments made in the affidavit and

counter affidavit, directed the appellant to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month

towards interim maintenance from the date of petition viz., 12.09.2019 and

Rs.20,000/- towards litigation expenses.

5.Against the said order dated 20.03.2021 made in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2417 of 2021

O.P.No.2223 of 2019, the appellant has come out with the present appeal.

6.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant reiterated the

averments made in the counter affidavit and further contended that the

appellant resigned his job from 15.10.2019 and due to Covid, he is unable to

get any other employment. He further contended that the appellant filed 3 pay

slips and his resignation letter along with the counter affidavit. The learned

Judge failed to consider the documents filed by him and contention of the

appellant that the respondent admitted in the counseling that she is working in

M/s.D4E Network India Private Limited and is earning a sum of Rs.19,000/-

per month. In view of the same, she is not entitled for any interim maintenance

and prayed for setting aside the order made in I.A.No.1 of 2019.

7.Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted

that appellant is gainfully employed and is getting considerable amount as

salary. It is the duty of the appellant to maintain the respondent who is his wife.

The respondent has no independent income. The learned Judge considering the

same, has rightly ordered interim maintenance and prayed for dismissal of the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2417 of 2021

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

8.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the

respondent and perused the entire materials available on record.

9.From the materials on record, it is seen that both the appellant and

respondent have not let in any oral evidence. It is not the case of the

respondent that she produced document to show that appellant was earning a

sum of Rs.50,000/- per month. On the other hand, the learned counsel

appearing for the appellant contended that the learned Judge has failed to

consider the 3 pay slips and resignation letter filed by the appellant before him.

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent did not deny that the

appellant has filed the said documents before the learned Judge. Further, it is

the case of the appellant that the respondent has admitted in the counselling

conducted in the O.P. that she is working in M/s.D4E Network India Private

Limited and is earning a sum of Rs.19,000/- per month. Now, the learned

counsel for the appellant produced the letter issued by M/s.Vector Projects (L)

Pvt. Ltd., accepting the resignation of the appellant and relieving the appellant

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2417 of 2021

with effect from 15.10.2019.

10.Both the appellant and respondent have not filed any document to

show that other party is employed and income is received. It is well settled that

it is the duty of the husband to maintain the wife. Considering the materials on

record in its entirety, it would be just and proper to direct the appellant to pay a

sum of Rs.5,000/- per month to the respondent towards interim maintenance

from the date of petition till the date of disposal of O.P. and Rs.20,000/-

towards litigation expenses. The impugned order of the learned Trial Judge

dated 20.03.2021 made in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in O.P.No.2223 of 2019 is

modified, directing the appellant to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five

thousand only) to the respondent towards interim maintenance regularly on or

before 10th of every month and a sum of Rs.20,000/- granted by the Tribunal

towards litigation expenses is confirmed. The appellant is directed to pay the

arrears of interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month from the date

of petition viz., 12.09.2019 till August 2022, amounting to Rs.1,80,000/- [36

months x Rs.5,000/-] within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of

a copy of this judgment. Considering the averments made in the counter

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2417 of 2021

affidavit filed in I.A.No.1 of 2019 as well as the contention of the learned

counsel appearing for the appellant that the respondent has not filed counter

statement in main O.P.No. 2223 of 2019 and only to drag on the main O.P., she

has filed I.A.No.1 of 2019, the respondent is directed to file counter statement,

if not already filed, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a

copy of this judgment. The learned Trial Judge is directed to dispose of the

O.P.No.2223 of 2019 as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within a period

of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

With the above directions, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly

allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

(V.M.V., J) (S.S., J) 01.08.2022

Index : Yes / No gsa

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2417 of 2021

V.M.VELUMANI,J.

and S.SOUNTHAR,J.

(gsa)

To

1.The V Additional Principal Judge, Full Additional Charge of II Additional Family Court, Chennai.

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

C.M.A.No.2417 of 2021

01.08.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter