Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Thirupathi Aananthan vs The Secretary To Government
2022 Latest Caselaw 7933 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7933 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 April, 2022

Madras High Court
K.Thirupathi Aananthan vs The Secretary To Government on 18 April, 2022
                                                                         W.P.(MD)Nos.15852 of 2019


                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED:18.04.2022
                                                    CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                           W.P.(MD)Nos.15852, 15854, 15856, 15857, 15859, 15862, 15864,
                                  15865, 15867, 15869, 15871 and 15872 of 2019

                     W.P.(MD) No.15852/2019

                     K.Thirupathi Aananthan                             ... Petitioner

                                                       Vs.

                     1.The Secretary to Government
                       Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department
                       Secretariat, Chennai.

                     2.The Commissioner of Rural Development and
                           Panchayat Raj
                       Panagal Building,
                       Saidapet, Chennai                         ... Respondents

                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent,
                     ie., the Secretary to Government, Rural development and Panchayat Raj
                     Department, Chennai to consider the petitioner's represent dated
                     08.05.2019 regarding counting the petitioner's services for the period
                     from 26.11.1994 to 03.12.2006 for the purpose of calculation of pension
                     and pass appropriate orders in the light of orders passed in W.P.No.12656

                     1/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 W.P.(MD)Nos.15852 of 2019


                     of 2013 dated 18.06.2014 and confirmed in common writ appeal (MD)
                     No.51 of 2018 dated 27.03.2018 reported in 2018 (1) CWC 689 quoting
                     the Hon'ble Supreme Court orders within a specified time frame that may
                     be fixed by this Court.


                                        For Petitioners          : Mr.S.Visvalingam
                                        For Respondents          : Mr.A.K.Manikkam
                                                                 Special Government Pleader


                                                     COMMON ORDER

                                  The relief sought for in the present writ petitions is to direct the

                     first respondent, ie., the Secretary to Government, Rural development

                     and Panchayat Raj Department, Chennai, to consider the petitioners'

                     representation dated 08.05.2019 regarding counting his services for the

                     period from 26.11.1994 to 03.12.2006 for the purpose of calculation of

                     pension and pass appropriate orders in the light of orders passed in

                     W.P.No.12656 of 2013 dated 18.06.2014 and confirmed in common writ

                     appeal (MD) No.51 of 2018 dated 27.03.2018 reported in 2018 (1) CWC

                     689 quoting the Hon'ble Supreme Court orders within a specified time

                     frame that may be fixed by this Court.


                     2/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               W.P.(MD)Nos.15852 of 2019




                                  2. The petitioner was serving as Office Assistant.         He was

                     originally serving as Hand Pump Fitter Assistant in Panchayat Union on

                     temporary basis. He has been continuously working without any break in

                     service till 03.12.2006 on daily wage basis. Subsequently the petitioner

                     was absorbed as Office Assistant in the regular time scale of pay with

                     effect from 04.12.2006 as per G.O.Ms.No.55 Rural Development and

                     Local Administration Department dated 15.05.2006. Thereafter, the

                     services of the writ petitioner had been regularised in the cadre of Office

                     Assistant with effect from 25.09.2006.



                                  3. With reference to the above facts, the learned counsel for the

                     petitioners reiterated that as per Rule 11(4) of the Tamil Nadu Pension

                     Rules, 1978, the temporary services rendered by the writ petitioner prior

                     to his date of regularization is to be reckoned for the purpose of

                     calculating the qualifying services.



                                  4. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner relied on the


                     3/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                          W.P.(MD)Nos.15852 of 2019


                     judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench reported in 2018 (1) CWC 689

                     in the case of Government of Tamil Nadu v. K.Sakthivel.



                                  5. The learned Special Government Pleader objected the said

                     contention by stating that the services of the writ petitioner was

                     regularised after 01.04.2003 more specifically after introducing the new

                     pension scheme and therefore, the petitioner is eligible under the

                     contributory pension scheme and thus, the question of counting the

                     services under the old Tamil Nadu Pension Rules does not arise at all.

                     Even in respect of the application of Rule 11(4) of the Tamil Nadu

                     Pension Rules, 1978, the matter was referred to the Full Bench, in view

                     of the conflicting judgment and the Hon'ble Full Bench settled the issues

                     in the case of Government of Tamil Nadu and others v.

                     R.Kaliyamoorthy reported in 2019 (6) CTC 705. As per the principles

                     laid down by the Full Bench, the petitioners are not eligible, as they were

                     regularly appointed in the sanctioned post only after 01.04.2003 and

                     therefore, the petitioners are brought under the contributory pension

                     scheme and thus, the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules are not applicable. The


                     4/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               W.P.(MD)Nos.15852 of 2019


                     above position is made clear by the Hon'ble Full Bench also and

                     therefore, the petitioners are not entitled for the relief.



                                  6. This Court is of the considered opinion that though the

                     petitioners are brought under the contributory Pension Scheme, the relief

                     sought for is to count the past services rendered by him, when the Tamil

                     Nadu Pension Rules was in force. In respect of Rule 11(4) of the said

                     Rules, the temporary services rendered by the petitioners shall be taken

                     into consideration for reckoning the qualifying services. The Full Bench

                     has laid down the principles for application of Rule 11(4) of the Tamil

                     Nadu Pension Rules. Therefore, the respondents are directed to verify

                     the service particulars of the petitioners with reference to the principles

                     laid down by the Full Bench in Government of Tamil Nadu and others

                     v. R.Kaliyamoorthy reported in 2019 (6) CTC 705 and pass appropriate

                     orders regarding the eligibility of the writ petitioners for counting the

                     past services under Rule 11(4) of the Pension Rules. The said exercise is

                     directed to be done by the respondents within a period of twelve weeks

                     from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.


                     5/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                W.P.(MD)Nos.15852 of 2019




                                  7. The writ petitions stand disposed of accordingly. No costs.



                                                                                           18.04.2022
                     Index:Yes/No
                     Internet:Yes
                     RR
                     To
                     1.The Secretary to Government
                       Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department
                       Secretariat, Chennai.

                     2.The Commissioner of Rural Development and
                           Panchayat Raj
                       Panagal Building,
                       Saidapet, Chennai




                     6/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                          W.P.(MD)Nos.15852 of 2019




                                                                     S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.

RR

W.P.(MD)Nos.15852 15854, 15856, 15857, 15859, 15862, 15864, 15865, 15867, 15869, 15871 and 15872 of 2019

18.04.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter