Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.Subbulakshmi vs The District Registrar
2022 Latest Caselaw 7516 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7516 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2022

Madras High Court
P.Subbulakshmi vs The District Registrar on 11 April, 2022
                                                                             W.P.(MD)No.6679 of 2022


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                    DATED: 11.04.2022

                                                       CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                             W.P.(MD)No.6679 of 2022

                     1.P.Subbulakshmi

                     2.G.Jegajothimani                                       .. Petitioners

                                                          Vs

                     1.The District Registrar,
                       District Registrar Office,
                       No.171, Palace Road,
                       Madurai South,
                       Madurai – 625 001.

                     2.Dheenadayalan

                     3.S.Amudhadevi                                          .. Respondents

                     PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to

                     issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to conduct

                     enquiry on the fraudulent sale deed in Document No.1332/2018 and

                     General Power of Attorney in Document No.1/2003, on the file of

                     Natham Sub Registrar Office, Dindigul District, based on the petitioner's

                     complaint, dated 19.01.2022, as per the circular issued by the Inspector


                     1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  W.P.(MD)No.6679 of 2022


                     General of Registration in his proceedings in Letter No.41530/U1/2017,

                     dated 08.11.2017 and proceed in accordance with law.

                                        For Petitioners   : Mr.V.Kishore Kumar

                                        For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel for R1
                                                          Additional Government Pleader

                                                           ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for a

direction to the first respondent to conduct enquiry on the alleged

fraudulent sale deed, dated 30.05.2018, registered as document No.

1332/2018 and the alleged fraudulent General Power of Attorney bearing

document No.1/2003, on the file of the Natham Sub Registrar's Office,

Dindigul District, based on the petitioner's complaint, dated 19.01.2022,

within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.The case of the petitioners is that the property conveyed under

the sale deed, dated 30.05.2018, registered as document No.1332/2018,

is their absolute property. According to the petitioners, patta also stands

in their name. They have given the details as to how they became the

owners of the property in the affidavit filed in support of this writ

petition.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.6679 of 2022

3.However, according to the petitioners, they came to know only

recently that a fraud has been played upon them by the second

respondent, who has got a sale deed, dated 30.05.2018, registered in the

name of the third respondent for the very same property, based upon a

power of attorney executed in favour of the second respondent in the

year 2003, through document No.1/2003. Having come to know about

the fraud, the petitioners have given a complaint to the first respondent

on 19.01.2022, calling upon the first respondent to take action and cancel

the sale deed and the power of attorney based on the circular issued by

the Inspector General of Registration, dated 08.11.2017. Since the

complaint of the petitioners has not been responded by the first

respondent, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

4.Heard Mr.V.Kishore Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner and Mr.S.Shanmugavel, learned Additional Government

Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent.

5.The petitioners have filed the following documents along with

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.6679 of 2022

this writ petition.

a) Copy of the Judgment passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge,

Dindigul in O.S.No.247 of 2010, dated 13.06.2011.

b) Copy of the Decree passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge,

Dindigul in O.S.No.247 of 2010, dated 13.06.2011.

c) Copy of the patta in patta No.1238, dated 10.09.2013.

d) Copy of the patta in patta No.2285, dated 10.09.2013.

e) Copy of the final decree passed by the learned Principal Subordinate

Judge, in I.A.No.458 of 2011, dated 17.04.2014.

f) Copy of the Judgment passed by the learned Principal Subordinate

Judge, in I.A.No.458 of 2011, dated 17.04.2014.

g) The proceedings of the Inspector General of Registration in letter No.

41530/U1/2017, dated 08.11.2017.

h) Copy of the sale deed executed by the second respondent to the third

respondent in document No.1332/2018, dated 30.05.2018.

I) Copy of the complaint given by the petitioners to the first respondent,

dated 19.01.2022.

6.As seen from the aforementioned documents, on a prima facie

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.6679 of 2022

consideration, this Court is of the considered view that the grievance

raised by the petitioners in this writ petition has to be considered on

merits and in accordance with law, by the first respondent. This Court

also deems it fit that even though the second and third respondents have

been made as party respondents, there is no necessity to issue notice to

them in this writ petition, in view of the serious allegations levelled

against them, which are supported by the documents.

7.No prejudice will be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner,

the second and third respondents are heard in the enquiry proceedings to

be conducted by the first respondent, pursuant to the directions given by

this Court.

8.For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the first respondent

to conduct enquiry on the petitioners' complaint, dated 19.01.2022,

seeking for cancellation of the sale deed, dated 30.05.2018, registered as

document No.1332/2018 and the power of attorney as document No.

1/2003 and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, after

affording a fair hearing to the petitioners and the respondents 2 and 3,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.6679 of 2022

including granting them the right of personal hearing, within a period of

twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

9.With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No

costs.

11.04.2022 Index: Yes/No Internet : Yes/No TM

Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, No.171, Palace Road, Madurai South, Madurai – 625 001.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.6679 of 2022

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

TM

W.P.(MD)No.6679 of 2022

11.04.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter