Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7458 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2022
C.R.P(MD)No.2413 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 08.04.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
C.R.P(MD)No.2413 of 2017
and
C.M.P(MD)No.11485 of 2017
Usha ... Petitioner/
Petitioner/Plaintiff
Vs.
S.K.Sikkaiyan ... Respondent/
Respondent/Defendant
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of
Constitution of India as against the fair and decreetal order, dated,
19.08.2016 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2016 in O.S.No.4 of 2016 on the file of
the Principal District Court, Theni.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.J.Karthick
for Mr.G.Kandha Vadivelan
For Respondents : Mr.K.Rajeswaran
for Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P(MD)No.2413 of 2017
ORDER
The plaintiff in a suit for recovery of money, is the revision
petitioner.
2. Pending suit, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.1 of 2016, seeking
attachment before judgment of the property. The application was heard
along with the suit and the suit was decreed ex-parte on 19.08.2016. On
the same day, citing the grounds of decree of the suit, the learned trial
Judge has proceeded to close the application for attachment before
judgment.
3. However, according to the learned counsel for the plaintiff, the
defendant has filed an application to set aside the ex-parte decree and the
said application has been allowed. Now, the suit has been restored to file.
Under Order 38 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, where a
property has been attached before judgment, it need not be re-attached in
the execution proceedings. The learned Judge, when he has decreed the
suit, ought not to have closed the application for attachment before
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD)No.2413 of 2017
judgment in view of the Order 38 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil
Procedure. However, the said application has been erroneously closed.
Now, the suit has been restored to file. The plaintiff is at liberty to file an
independent application for attachment before judgment under Order 38
Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. As and when such application is
filed, the same may be considered on merits and orders may be passed.
4. With the above said observations, this Civil Revision Petition is
disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous
Petition is closed.
08.04.2022
gbg
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD)No.2413 of 2017
To
1.The Principal District Court, Theni.
2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD)No.2413 of 2017
R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.
gbg
Order made in C.R.P(MD)No.2413 of 2017
08.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!