Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7272 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 April, 2022
Rev.Aplw(md)No.16 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED:06.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Rev. Aplw(MD)No.16 of 2022
in
W.P(MD)No.5534 of 2015
1.The Chairman
Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution
Corporation Ltd.,
th
10 Floor, N.P.K.RR.Maligai,
No.144, Anna Salai,
Chennai-2.
2.The Chief Engineer(Personnel)
Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution
Corporation Ltd.,
th
10 Floor, N.P.K.RR.Maligai,
No.144, Anna Salai,
Chennai-2.
3.The Chief Engineer,
Tuticorin Thermal Power Station,
Tuticorin-4,
Tuticorin District. ... Petitioners/Respondents
Vs.
1.N.Subbaiah ...1st Respondent/Petitioner
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Rev.Aplw(md)No.16 of 2022
2.The Principal Accountant General (A&E)
Teynampet,
Chennai-18. ... 2nd Respondent/4th Respondent
PRAYER: Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 C.P.C., r/w Section
114 of C.P.C., to review the order dated 26.11.2020 passed in
W.P(MD)No.5534 of 2015.
For Petitioner : M/s.T.S.Gopalan and Co.,
ORDER
The order sought to be reviewed dated 26.11.2020 passed in
W.P(MD)No.5534 of 2015, reads as under:
“3.The Hon'ble Full Bench of the High Court of Madras settled the issues with reference to counting of 50% of the services with reference to the Rule 11(4) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules in Writ Appeal No.158 of 2016 etc., batch, dated 03.12.2019.
4.In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court, the case of the petitioner is also to be considered with reference to his service records and accordingly, appropriate orders are to be passed as expeditiously as possible.”
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Rev.Aplw(md)No.16 of 2022
2.This Court has passed an order by referring the judgment of the
Hon'ble Full Bench of the High Court, for the purpose of considering the
facts with reference to the service particulars of the individual. The order
clearly states that the case of the petitioner is to be considered with
reference to the service records and taking note of the principles laid
down by the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court. Therefore, the review
petitioners are empowered to consider the facts independently with
reference to the service records and take an appropriate decision on
merits and in accordance with law. Directing the authorities to consider
the facts and service records cannot be construed as a positive direction
and it is a direction to consider the materials available on record and take
an independent decision on merits and in accordance with law. This
being the scope of the order passed by this Court, no review needs to be
undertaken.
3.With these clarifications, this Review Petition stands dismissed.
No costs.
06.04.2022 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Ns
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Rev.Aplw(md)No.16 of 2022
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.
Ns
Rev. Aplw(MD)No.16 of 2022 in W.P(MD)No.5534 of 2015
06.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!