Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Indian Oil Corporation ... vs Mr.Vivekanandan .. 1St
2022 Latest Caselaw 7011 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7011 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2022

Madras High Court
The Indian Oil Corporation ... vs Mr.Vivekanandan .. 1St on 4 April, 2022
                                                                         O.S.A.Nos. 48 and 49 of 2022



                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 04.04.2022

                                                        CORAM :

                                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY
                                                         AND
                                  THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V. THAMILSELVI
                                           O.S.A.Nos. 48 and 49 of 2022
                                        and C.M.P. Nos. 5275 & 5292 of 2022


                     The Indian Oil Corporation Limited,
                     Southern Regional Office,
                     At No.139, Nungambakkam High Road,
                     Chennai – 600 034.
                     Rep. By its Chief Manager.                     .. Appellant in both OSAs

                                                           v.


                     1. Mr.Vivekanandan            ..    1st Respondent in O.S.A. No.48/2021
                                                         and Respondent in O.S.A. No.49/2021
                     2. Ms. Kavitha Ravichandran
                     3. Ms. Deepa Udday Kumar
                     4. Ms.Priyadrshini Vivekanandan
                     5. Hari Venkata Subamanium
                                              ... Respondents 2 to 5 in O.S.A. No.48/2021




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                           O.S.A.Nos. 48 and 49 of 2022

                     O.S.A.No.48 of 2021:          Original Side Appeal filed under Clause 15 of
                     Letters Patent and under section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015,
                     against the Judgment and Decree dated 17.12.2019 made in C.S..No.628
                     of 2018 in Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction of this court.


                     O.S.A.No.49 of 2021:          Original Side Appeal filed under Clause 15 of
                     Letters Patent and under section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015,
                     against the Judgment and Decree dated 17.12.2019 made in
                     Tr.C.S..No.560 of 2019 in Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction of this
                     court.
                                  For Appellants    : Mr. Mr. Vijay Meganathan
                                  (in both Appeals)

                                  For Respondent : Mr. Utham Joseph Cheriyan
                                  (in both Appeals)
                                                   COMMON JUDGMENT

                                     (Judgment was delivered by M. DURAISWAMY, J.)


                                  When the Original Side Appeals are taken up for hearing on

                     01.04.2022, Mr. Vijay Meganathan, learned counsel appearing for the

                     appellant submitted that instead of going into the merits of the common

                     judgment and decree passed by the learned Single Judge in C.S.No.628

                     of 2018 and Tr.C.S.No.560 of 2019, it would be suffice to grant three

                     months time to the appellant to vacate and hand over vacant possession


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                O.S.A.Nos. 48 and 49 of 2022

                     of the suit property to the respondents-landlords. Mr. Utham Joseph

                     Cheriyan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, had no

                     objection for granting three months time. Recording the submissions

                     made by the learned counsel on either side, this court, posted the Original

                     Side Appeals on 04.04.2022 to file an affidavit of undertaking by the

                     appellant-Corporation.



                                  2. Accordingly, the Original Side Appeals are posted today and

                     the learned counsel for the appellant filed an affidavit of undertaking

                     dated 04.04.222, wherein it has been stated as follows:-

                                         ".......... 5. I submit that the Corporation is
                                  operating a retail outlet in the suit schedule property and
                                  there are petroleum products in the retail outlet the same
                                  are highly inflammable and are to be handled by trained
                                  personnel. I submit that as this Hon'ble Court has held
                                  that Corporation does not have a right to be on the
                                  property, it is humbly requested that the Corporation
                                  may be permitted to sell the products available in the
                                  retails outset as of date.

                                         6. I submit that the Corporation undertakes to
                                  vacate and handover the suit schedule property within
                                  three months as removal of underground storage tanks,
                                  degassing, dispensing units, etc. which has its
                                  inherent safety hazards are to be handled with trained
                                  personnel. ......”


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                             O.S.A.Nos. 48 and 49 of 2022




                                  3. The averments stated in the affidavit filed in support of the

                     Original Side Appeals are recorded and the above Original Side

                     appeals are disposed of by granting three months time to the

                     appellant-Corporation to vacate and hand over vacant possession of

                     the suit property to the respondents-landlords without driving them to

                     initiate execution proceedings.          It is needless to say that till the

                     appellant-Corporation vacate and hand over vacant possession of the

                     suit property, they shall continue to pay the monthly rents to the

                     respondents-landlords without any default. No costs. Consequently,

                     connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.



                                                                     [M.D., J.]    [T.V.T.S., J.]
                                                                             04.04.2022
                     Index              : Yes/No
                     Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order

                     Rj
                                                                          M. DURAISWAMY, J.

and T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.Nos. 48 and 49 of 2022

Rj

O.S.A.Nos. 48 and 49 of 2022 and C.M.P. Nos.5292 & 5275 of 2022

04.04.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter