Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sathyaraj vs The Director
2022 Latest Caselaw 6899 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6899 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2022

Madras High Court
Sathyaraj vs The Director on 4 April, 2022
                                                                                  C.M.A.No.2154 of 2019

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                      DATED: 04.04.2022

                                                             CORAM

                                          THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

                                                    C.M.A.No.2154 of 2019

                     Sathyaraj                                                   ... Appellant
                                                              -Vs.-
                     1.The Director,
                       Rural Development & Panchayat Raj,
                       Chennai.

                     2.The Block Development Officer,
                       T.Palur.

                     3.The District Collector,
                       Ariyalur.                                                 ... Respondents


                     Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor
                     Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgement and decree in M.C.O.P.No.133 of
                     2016 dated 28.11.2017 on the file of the MACT/Chief Judicial Magistrate at
                     Ariyalur, Ariyalur District.
                                             For Appellant    :       M/s.R.Jayaprakash
                                             For R1 to R3     :       No appearance

                                                       JUDGMENT

The claimant has challenged the award passed by the learned Chief

Judicial Magistrate (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) at Ariyalur in

M.C.O.P.No.133 of 2016 dated 28.11.2017.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2154 of 2019

2. The appellant herein/claimant had filed the above M.C.O.P,

seeking compensation of a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by

him in a road accident. It is the case of the appellant / claimant that on

15.04.2011 at around 08.30 hours, when he was proceeding in his TVS CVTR

motor cycle, bearing Registration No.TN 61 A 2013 from East to West on the

Vilangudi - Ariyalur Road, the first respondent's Mahindra Bolero white colour

car, bearing Registration No.TN 46 G 0204, coming in the opposite direction,

driven by the driver at a high speed in a rash and negligent manner, dashed

against the claimant and it had caused severe injuries all over his body. He was

taken to the Government Hospital, Ariyalur, from where, later he was

transferred to Tanjore Medical College Hospital. It is the case of the claimant

that he was engaged in doing Centering work in the buildings. By reason of the

injuries, he is unable to work as before and therefore, he has come forward with

the claim petition.

3. The respondents have filed a counter affidavit, inter-alia,

contending that the driver, who was driving the Mahindra Bolera car, had

driven it in a normal speed and it was the claimant, who in an inebriated state,

had driven his bike in a rash and negligent manner, as a result of which, he had

dashed against the right side of the first respondent's vehicle. On account of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2154 of 2019

this impact and as the claimant was in an inebriated condition, he had fallen

down. The accident had occurred only on account of the negligence of the

driver of the motor-cycle and not the driver of the car. The Tribunal below has

held negligence to be exclusively on the driver of the first respondent's vehicle,

thereby, holding the respondents liable.

4. As regards the quantum of compensation, the claimant would

submit that he was engaged in centering work from where, he would earn a

minimum a sum of Rs.15,000/- per month. However, the Tribunal fixed the

monthly income at Rs.5,000/-. Thereafter, considering the fact that the injuries

sustained by him was not of a permanent nature affecting the work of the

claimant, the disability, though assessed at 63%, was taken into account and

the compensation under the head of disability was awarded as follows:

3,000 x 63% = Rs.1,89,000/-

5. The appellant, is particularly, aggrieved by the amount awarded

under the head of disability.

6. The respondents, though served, had not entered appearance.

Therefore, this Court had proceeded to hear the appellant alone.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2154 of 2019

7. A perusal of the disability certificate-Ex-P2 does not indicate a

very serious permanent disability. A perusal of the evidence of the Doctor,

who was examined as P.W.2 and who had issued the disability certificate,

clearly shows that the Doctor himself had accepted that the appellant is

capable of taking care of himself. Therefore, it would clearly show that the

claimant had not suffered any permanent disablement. However, taking into

account the year of the accident, a sum of Rs.4,000/- is taken for the purpose of

calculating the compensation under the head of permanent disability.

Therefore, the award under the head of permanent disability is calculated now

at Rs.4,000/- x 63 = Rs.2,52,000/-. Therefore, the award is re-worked as

follows:-

                                                Heads               Amount by the         Amount
                                                                      Tribunal         Awarded by this
                                                                         in Rs.            Court
                                                                                           in Rs.
                                        Disability Compensation            1,89,000            2,52,000
                                                                        (3,000 x 63)        (4,000 x 63)
                                        Loss of income for three             15,000                 15,000
                                        months 3 x 5000
                                        Surgery for removing                 10,000                 10,000
                                        the plates
                                        Transportation                        5,000                  5,000
                                        Extra nourishment                    10,000                 10,000
                                        Attender Charges                     10,000                 10,000
                                        Damage to clothes                     2,000                  2,000
                                                            Total          2,41,000            3,04,000

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   C.M.A.No.2154 of 2019




8. The appeal is partly allowed and the impugned Award of the Tribunal

is modified, enhancing the compensation amount from Rs.2,41,000 to

Rs.3,04,000. The respondents are directed to deposit the said amount to the

credit of M.C.O.P.No.133 of 2016 along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per

annum from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit and costs as

awarded by the Tribunal, less, the amount, if any already deposited, within a

period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. On such

deposit being made, the claimant is permitted to withdraw the award amount,

along with accrued interest and costs as awarded by the Tribunal, less, the

amount, if any already withdrawn, by filing necessary application before the

Tribunal. The claimant is directed to pay the Court fee for the enhanced

compensation amount, if required. The Tribunal below shall not disburse the

enhanced amount till such time as the certified copy showing proof of payment

of Court fee has been produced by the claimants. In other respects, the Award

of the Tribunal is hereby confirmed. There shall be no order as to costs in the

present appeal.

04.04.2022

Index:Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No srn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2154 of 2019

To

1. The MACT/Chief Judicial Magistrate at Ariyalur, Ariyalur District.

2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2154 of 2019

P.T.ASHA.J

srn

C.M.A.No.2154 of 2019

04.04.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter