Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19978 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 September, 2021
C.S.No.6 of 1999
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.09.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.S.No.6 of 1999
and
O.A.No.9 of 1999
A.P.International
708 Shivalya 'A' Block
198 Ethiraj Salai
Egmore, Chennai 105
rep. by Partner Arjundas Pokardas
... Plaintiff
.Vs.
1.M/s.Gayathri Films
11-A Jubilee Road
Chennai – 600 033
rep. by its Partner
Chitra Lakshmanan
2.M/s.Gemini Colour Lab
No.2 Vembuli Amman Koil Street
Chennai – 600 078.
... Defendants
Page No.1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.S.No.6 of 1999
Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
read with Section 55 of the Copyright Act and Order IV Rule 1 of the
Original Side Rules praying for a decree and judgment on the following
terms :
a) Permanent injunction restraining the first defendant, its men,
agents or servants or anyone claiming through them from in any manner
infringing the copyrights assigned to the plaintiff under its agreement
with the first defendant dated 20.05.1997 and 22.08.1998 in respect of
the Tamil feature film “Chinna Rajaa” either by releasing the film
without first giving the plaintiff the prints for exploitation as per the
agreed terms or in any other manner;
b) Permanent injunction restraining the second defendant from
releasing to anyone other than the plaintiff, any prints of the Tamil
feature film “Chinna Rajaa” produced by the first defendant for overseas
theatrical exploitation excluding India and for exploitation over
terrestrial TV, Satellite TV, Cable TV, Cable Pay TV and Satellite Pay
TV, direct to user, laser disc, video, compact disc video, digital video
disc and multimedia including Doordarshan India terrestrial TV and
c) direct the defendants to pay the costs of the suit.
Page No.2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.S.No.6 of 1999
For Plaintiff : Mr.K.R.Gokul Sundar
for Mr.C.Seethapathy
For Defendants : Mr.C.Ramesh
********
JUDGMENT
Mr.K.R.Gokul Sundar, learned counsel representing
Mr.C.Seethapathy, learned counsel for the plaintiff would submit that he
has instructions to withdraw the suit. He has also made an endorsement
to that effect.
2. Recording the said submission and endorsement made by the
counsel for the plaintiff, this suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Consequently, the connected application is closed.
29.09.2021
dsa
Index : No
Internet : Yes
Non-Speaking order
Page No.3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.6 of 1999
List of the witnesses examined on the side of the plaintiff: Nil
List of Exhibits marked on the side of the plaintiff : Nil
List of the witnesses examined on the side of the defendants: Nil
List of Exhibits marked on the side of the defendants: Nil
29.09.2021 dsa
Page No.4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.6 of 1999
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
dsa
C.S.No.6 of 1999
29.09.2021
Page No.5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!