Madras High Court
K. Kanimozhi vs K.Ganapathy ...1St on 29 September, 2021
A.S.No.689 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.09.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
A.S.No.689 of 2019
and
C.M.P.No.20756 of 2019
K. Kanimozhi ...Appellant/Obstruction Petitioner/
Third Party
Vs.
Kandasamy (died)
1.K.Ganapathy ...1st Respondent/1st Respondent/
Decree Holder/Plaintiff
2.Ponnammal
3.P.K. Palanisamy ...Respondents 2&3/Respondents 2&3
Judgment Debtors 2& 3/
Defendants 2 & 3
PRAYER: Appeal Suit filed under Order 41 Rule 1 read with Order
21 Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment
and Decree dated 02.08.2019 made in E.A.(SR).No.709 of 2019 in
E.P.No.34 of 2018 in E.P.No.68 of 2014 in O.S.No.55 of 2012 on
the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/10
A.S.No.689 of 2019
For Appellant : Mr.N. Manoharan
For Respondents : Mr.J. Bharathi Raja for R1
R2 and R3 – Served
No appearance
JUDGMENT
The appellant whose petition filed under the provisions of
Order XXI Rules 97 and 99 of the Code of Civil Procedure had been
dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri,
without even registering the said petition is before this Court
challenging the said order.
2.The facts in brief which are necessary for disposing of this
appeal are as follows:
The 1st respondent had filed a suit O.S.No.55 of 2012 on the
file of the learned Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri, for Specific
Performance of the Agreement dated 23.08.2012 entered into
between himself and the respondents 1 to 3 herein.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3.In the said suit, the 2nd respondent herein had filed a Written
A.S.No.689 of 2019
Statement, which has been adopted by the said Kandasamy and the
3rd respondent herein, in which they had referred to a suit O.S.No.89
of 2014 filed by the appellant herein before the learned Subordinate
Judge, Arur seeking partition of the properties, which are the subject
matter of the instant suit in O.S.No.550 of 2012.
4.The learned Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri after trial
had proceeded to decree the suit as prayed for by her Judgment and
Decree dated 20.08.2015. Pursuant to the said Judgment and Decree
in the above suit, the 1st respondent had filed R.E.P.No.68 of 2014
for execution of the Sale Deed in his favour. The said execution
proceedings were dismissed for default on 14.07.2015 and
thereafter, the 1st respondent had filed E.P.No.34 of 2018 for the
very same relief. In the said execution proceedings, the appellant
herein had filed the impugned petition in EA.S.R.No.709 of 2019. It
is her case that the property in question was an ancestral joint family
property in which the petitioner had a 1/5th share. It is also her case
that she had issued a Legal Notice dated 09.08.2014 to the said
Kandasamy and respondents 2 and 3 seeking a partition of her 1/5th
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.S.No.689 of 2019
share. Since there was no response to the above notice she had
proceeded to file the suit O.S.No.89 of 2014 for a partition and
separate possession of her 1/5th share. It is also her contention that
despite the learned Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri, being
informed about the said proceedings, the learned Judge had neither
framed an issue with reference to the above nor taken into
consideration the said defence but had decreed the suit on
05.10.2015 as prayed for. It is therefore her contention that till such
time as her share in the property is divided by metes and bounds the
possession of the property cannot be handed over to the 1st
respondent/Decree holder.
5.The learned Additional District Judge, Dharampuri, without
numbering and ordering notice to the respondents proceeded to
dismiss the said application on merits. Challenging the said
Judgment and Decree the appellant is before this Court.
6.On hearing the submissions of both the counsels the
following point arises for consideration in the above First Appeal:
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.S.No.689 of 2019
“Whether the learned Additional District
Judge, Dharampuri was right in disposing of the
petition on merits without numbering the said
application and issuing notice to the respondents?”
7.Mr. N.Manokaran, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of
the appellant would submit that the appellant has got a Decree for
partition in her favour in and by which she is entitled to a share in
the suit property. The appellant is yet to file a Final Decree
proceedings in and by which her share in the suit property could be
demarcated by metes and bounds. In the suit for partition, once the
finding has been rendered that the appellant is entitled to 1/5th share
in the ancestral property, the 1st respondent herein can seek to have
a Sale Deed executed only with reference to the remaining 4/5th
share and the possession can be handed only after the share of the
appellant and the respondents demarcated and allotted in the final
decree proceedings. He would further submit that the procedure
adopted by the learned Judge in dismissing the application at the
CFR stage is contrary to the dicta laid down time and again by this
Court as well as the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.S.No.689 of 2019
8.The learned counsel for the respondents would submit that
the learned Judge has considered the application on merits and has
passed a very detailed order to which no exception can be taken and
therefore, the appeal deserves to be dismissed.
9.Heard the learned counsels appearing on either side and
perused the papers.
10.The learned Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri, before
whom the impugned petition was filed under the provisions of Order
XXI Rules 97 and 99 of the Code of Civil Procedure has dismissed
the petition without numbering and ordering notice to the
respondents after considering the said application on merits in detail.
The learned Judge has observed that the Judgment and Decree has
been passed in O.S.No.55 of 2012 after a detailed consideration of
the defence raised by the respondents 2 and 3 and late Kandasamy.
The learned Judge has further observed that the respondents 2 and 3
have not filed the documents pertaining to the suit O.S.No.89 of
2014 which had decreed in favour of the appellant herein. Once it
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.S.No.689 of 2019
has been brought to the notice of the Court that a claim has been
made by a person in whose favour a decree has been passed in
respect of the very same property, subject matter of the Execution
Proceedings, such a person ought to be given an opportunity to make
their submissions and after hearing both parties should pass orders.
This can be done only after the application has been numbered and
notice directed to the respondents. The learned Judge has further
overlooked the fact that an application under Order XXI Rules 97
and 99 of CPC has to be determined by the Court as if it is dealing
with a suit since the provisions of Order XXI Rule 101 clearly
emphasize that all questions including right, title or interest to a
property arising between the parties in a proceeding under Order
XXI Rules 97 and 99 of CPC has to be determined by the Court
without relegating parties to a separate suit. The appellant has rightly
invoked the said provisions and the learned Judge ought to have
numbered the application and considered the petition on merits
instead of dismissing it at the CFR stage.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.S.No.689 of 2019
11.In the result, this First Appeal is allowed. The petition in
question is remanded back to the learned Additional District Judge,
Dharampuri with a direction to number the same and hear the
petition on merits. The said exercise shall be completed within a
period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the copy of the
Judgment and Decree of this Court. There shall be no order as to
costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
29.09.2021
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
mps
To
The Additional District Judge,
Dharmapuri.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.S.No.689 of 2019
P.T. ASHA, J,
mps
A.S.No.689 of 2019
and
C.M.P.No.20756 of 2019
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.S.No.689 of 2019
29.09.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
