Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Nagarajan vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
2021 Latest Caselaw 19410 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19410 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2021

Madras High Court
K.Nagarajan vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 22 September, 2021
                                                               W.P.(MD)Nos.4769, 4771 and 10050 of 2021


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED: 22.09.2021

                                                     CORAM

                       THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

                                    W.P.(MD)Nos.4769, 4771 and 10050 of 2021
                                                      and
                             W.M.P(MD).Nos.3883,3885,3887,3888,7758 and 7761 of 2021

                     1. K.Nagarajan
                     2. N.Sumathi                                           ... Petitioners
                                                                 in W.P(MD).No.4769 of 2021
                     1. N.Krishnammal
                     2. N.Nagendran
                     3. N.Nagarajan                                          ... Petitioners
                                                                 in W.P(MD).No.4771 of 2021
                     1.Smt.Vasantha
                     2. Smt.Jayalakshmi
                     3. Smt.Maheswari                                        ... Petitioners
                                                                 in W.P(MD).No.10050 of 2021

                                                       Vs.


                     1. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                        Rep. by its Secretary to Government,
                        Highways Department, Secretariat,
                        Chennai - 600 009.

                     2. The District Collector,
                        Madurai District, Madurai.

                     3. The District Revenue Officer,
                        Madurai District, Collectorate Campus,


                     1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                              W.P.(MD)Nos.4769, 4771 and 10050 of 2021


                         Madurai.

                     4. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                        Thirumangalam Division,
                        Thirumangalam,
                        Madurai District.                                        ... Respondents

in all the Writ Petitions

5. Smt.Lakshmi

6. Thiru. Rajavel

7. Thiru.Rajaganapathi ... Respondents 5,6 and 7 in W.P(MD).No.10050 of 2021

Prayer in W.P(MD).No.4769 of 2021: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Declaration declaring the land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 in Na.Ka.No.4185/2017/B6 dated 14.12.2020 in respect of petitioner's landed property along with superstructure in an extent of 253 Sq.mtrs. comprised in Town Survey No.7, Ward No.7, Thirumangalam Municipality, Madurai District as lapsed and inoperative in view of the enactment of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Prayer in W.P(MD).No.4771 of 2021: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Declaration declaring the land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 in Na.Ka.No.4185/2017/B6 dated 14.12.2020 in respect of petitioner's landed property along with superstructure in an extent of 258 Sq.mtrs. comprised in Town Survey No.8, Ward No.8,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD)Nos.4769, 4771 and 10050 of 2021

Thirumangalam Municipality, Madurai District as lapsed and inoperative in view of the enactment of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Prayer in W.P(MD).No.10050 of 2021: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Declaration declaring the land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 initiated by the 3rd respondent in by proceedings in Na.Ka.No.4185/2017/B6 dated 14.12.2020 in respect of petitioner's landed property along with superstructure in an extent of 711 Sq.mtrs. comprised in Town Survey Nos.3,5 and 6 in Ward No.C, Block No.7, Thirumangalam Municipality, Madurai District as lapsed and inoperative in view of the enactment of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.R.Kannan in W.P(MD).Nos.4769 and 4771 of 2021 Mr.K.Hemakarthikeyan in W.P(MD).No.10050 of 2021 For Respondents : Mr.Veera Kathiravan, Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.K.S.Selva Ganesan, Counsel for the State for R1 to R4 in all the Writ Petitions.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD)Nos.4769, 4771 and 10050 of 2021

COMMON ORDER

In these three writ petitions, the respective petitioner seeks a

declaration that the land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Tamil

Nadu Highways Act, 2001 are deemed to have lapsed and become

inoperative in view of the enactment of the Right To Fair Compensation

and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement

Act, 2013 (Act 30 of 2013).

2. The principal basis on which the acquisition proceedings are

challenged in these three writ petitions is that the State enactment is

repugnant to Act 30 of 2013, which was made on 27.09.2013. However,

after these writ petitions were filed, the State enacted the Tamil Nadu

Land Acquisition Laws (Revival of Operation, Amendment and

Validation) Act, 2019, which came into effect from 26.09.2013 and had

the effect of saving the three State enactments, including the Tamil Nadu

Highways Act, 2001, with effect from 26.09.2013. Upon challenge, the

Hon'ble Supreme Court upheld the validity of the above mentioned Act

of 2019 in the judgment in G.Mohan Rao Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD)Nos.4769, 4771 and 10050 of 2021

2019 SCC Online SC 440. Consequently, the basis of challenge in the

present writ petitions has been rejected by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

3. Accordingly, W.P.(MD)Nos.4769, 4771 and 10050 of 2021 are

dismissed without any order as to costs by leaving it open to the

respective petitioner to institute appropriate legal proceedings to

challenge the acquisition proceedings on grounds other than repugnancy.

Consequently, connected W.M.P(MD).Nos.3883,3885,3887,3888,7758

and 7761 of 2021 are closed.

22.09.2021

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No pkn

To

1. The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Highways Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9.

2. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD)Nos.4769, 4771 and 10050 of 2021

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

pkn

3. The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Collectorate Campus, Madurai.

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thirumangalam Division, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.

W.P.(MD)Nos.4769, 4771 and 10050 of 2021

22.09.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter