Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Manjula vs The Chairman
2021 Latest Caselaw 19376 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19376 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2021

Madras High Court
M.Manjula vs The Chairman on 22 September, 2021
                                                                              W.P.No.6571 of 2020

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                           RESERVED ON :23.07.2021
                                           DATED       : 22.09.2021

                                                     CORAM:

                                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH

                                             W.P.No.6571 of 2020
                                           and WMP.No.7790 of 2020

                      M.Manjula                                        ...Petitioner

                                                         Vs

                      1.The Chairman,
                        Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission,
                        TNPSC Road, VOC Nagar,
                        Park Town,
                        Chennai-600 003.

                      2.The Secretary,
                        Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission,
                        TNPSC Road, VOC Nagar,
                        Park Town,
                        Chennai-600 003.                               ...Respondents


                      PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                      India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to
                      consider    the   representation   dated   09.03.2020   sent     by   the
                      petitioner and pass suitable orders in accordance with law, within a
                      stipulated period by allowing her to participate in certificate
                      verification.
                                         For Petitioner  : Mr.C.Umashankar
                                         For Respondent-1: Mr.K.V.Sajeev Kumar,
                                                           Counsel for Government
                                         For Respondent-2: Mr.V.Balamurali Krishnan


                      1/9
http://www.judis.nic.in
                            W.P.No.6571 of 2020




                      2/9
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                            W.P.No.6571 of 2020

                                                   ORDER

By consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is heard

through Video Conferencing on 23.07.2021.

2. The petitioner herein is aggrieved against her non-

selection to the posts called for by the respondents under

Notification No.19 of 2019 dated 14.06.2019. Similarly placed

persons, who were not considered for selection owing to non-

production of “Persons Studied in Tamil Medium” (PSTM)

Certificates, Community Certificates, Under Graduation and Post

Graduation Certificates, etc., were also deprived of the selection

and when they had approached this Court by filing of Writ

Petitions, ventilating their grievances, this Court, in the cases of

G.Tamilarasi Vs. Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission in

W.P.No.5726 of 2020 dated 11.12.2020 and J.Karthik Vs.

Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission in W.P.No.4866 of

2020 dated 05.02.2021, had allowed the Writ Petitions, by

condoning the non-production of certificates. It is stated across the

bar that the Writ Appeal in W.A.No.1329 of 2021, as against the

order in W.P.No.4866 of 2020, was dismissed by the Hon'ble

Division Bench of this Court on 14.06.2021.

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.6571 of 2020

3. The issue now seems to be settled by the learned Single

Judge of this Court in G.Tamilarasi's case (supra) and the relevant

portion of the order reads as follows:-

“8. When the matter was taken up for hearing earlier, this Court has directed the Commission vide interim order dated 04.03.2020, to permit the petitioner to attend the counseling on any one of the dates scheduled without prejudice to the rights of the parties in the writ petition. Thereafter, it appears that the petitioner was permitted to participate in the counseling and the certificates as required by the Commission were also produced to the satisfaction of the Commission. Ultimately, the petitioner being found eligible for appointment in the category for which she laid her claim, the provisional appointment has also been issued appointing the petitioner as Junior Assistant in Public Health and Preventive Medicine Department, in pursuance of her selection pursuant to the subject Notification. However, the appointment is stated to be subject to the disposal of the present writ petition.

9. On behalf of the respondent Commission, a counter affidavit has been filed.

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.6571 of 2020

In the counter affidavit, it is stated that when the candidates were informed of the selection procedure as stipulated in the Notification itself, it is the responsibility of the candidate to ensure that all the certificates were uploaded within the time stipulated by the Commission. As far as the Commission is concerned, the PSTM claim of the petitioner could not be considered in the absence of 10th Std certificate as a proof of petitioner having done her schooling in Tamil Medium of Instructions. Therefore, she could not be considered against the PSTM Quota.

10. Mr.NGR.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner cannot be faulted for the error, even assuming that the certificate in question has not been uploaded by the E-Seva Centre. The E~Seva Centre has in fact issued acknowledgment for having uploaded all the certificates, vide its receipt dated 07.12.2019. Therefore, the petitioner was under the bonafide impression that every requirement has been complied with.

11. In any event, he would submit that, now, the petitioner has been found to be eventually eligible for appointment and appointment order has also been issued, the writ

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.6571 of 2020

petition may be disposed of in favour of the petitioner, taking note of the positive development.

12. Although in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner cannot be faulted with for not uploading 10th Std PSTM certificate, at the same time, the Commission cannot also be blamed for originally not considering the claim of the petitioner. As far as the Commission is concerned, the required certificate did not reach the Commission-s office and therefore, there was no scope for the Commission to consider the petitioner against PSTM Quota.

13. In any case, this Court has intervened and passed interim orders and on the basis of which, the petitioner was allowed to participate in the counseling provisionally and ultimately the petitioner has been favoured with the provisional appointment order also. When the petitioner is found to be fully eligible for appointment and being appointed also as Junior Assistant, this Court is of the view that, in all fairness, the issue must rest at that.

14. This Court is not inclined to fathom out

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.6571 of 2020

as to who is to be blamed in the contention between petitioner and the respondent Commission for non availability of the certificate in question at the crucial time. According to this Court, such blame game is of no consequence, in view of the subsequent development wherein the petitioner has been issued a provisional appointment order.

15. In the above circumstances, the considered view of this Court is that the petitioner should be allowed to enjoy the fruition of the appointment without any strings attached to her appointment. This is particularly so, that the petitioner being a Destitute Widow, has earned her appointment in her own right.”

The aforesaid extract is self explanatory and the ratio laid down

therein is squarely applicable to the facts involved in the present

Writ Petition. As such, the petitioner herein would also be entitled

for the relief in accordance with the aforesaid order.

4. In the light of the above observations and the judgment of

this Court in G.Tamilarasi's case (supra), the petitioner's

candidature is directed to be included in the selection list for

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.6571 of 2020

appointment to Group-IV posts, pursuant to the Notification No.19

of 2019 dated 14.06.2019. Consequently, there shall be a direction

to the concerned respondent/Government Department to issue

posting orders, as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within a

period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands allowed.

Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. There

shall be no orders as to costs.

22.09.2021 Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order Note:Issue order copy on 24.09.2021 DP

To

1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Road, VOC Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-600 003.

2.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Road, VOC Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-600 003.

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.6571 of 2020

M.S.RAMESH,J.

DP

ORDER MADE IN W.P.No.6571 of 2020 and WMP.No.7790 of 2020

22.09.2021

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter