Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19376 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2021
W.P.No.6571 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON :23.07.2021
DATED : 22.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
W.P.No.6571 of 2020
and WMP.No.7790 of 2020
M.Manjula ...Petitioner
Vs
1.The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission,
TNPSC Road, VOC Nagar,
Park Town,
Chennai-600 003.
2.The Secretary,
Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission,
TNPSC Road, VOC Nagar,
Park Town,
Chennai-600 003. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to
consider the representation dated 09.03.2020 sent by the
petitioner and pass suitable orders in accordance with law, within a
stipulated period by allowing her to participate in certificate
verification.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Umashankar
For Respondent-1: Mr.K.V.Sajeev Kumar,
Counsel for Government
For Respondent-2: Mr.V.Balamurali Krishnan
1/9
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P.No.6571 of 2020
2/9
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P.No.6571 of 2020
ORDER
By consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is heard
through Video Conferencing on 23.07.2021.
2. The petitioner herein is aggrieved against her non-
selection to the posts called for by the respondents under
Notification No.19 of 2019 dated 14.06.2019. Similarly placed
persons, who were not considered for selection owing to non-
production of “Persons Studied in Tamil Medium” (PSTM)
Certificates, Community Certificates, Under Graduation and Post
Graduation Certificates, etc., were also deprived of the selection
and when they had approached this Court by filing of Writ
Petitions, ventilating their grievances, this Court, in the cases of
G.Tamilarasi Vs. Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission in
W.P.No.5726 of 2020 dated 11.12.2020 and J.Karthik Vs.
Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission in W.P.No.4866 of
2020 dated 05.02.2021, had allowed the Writ Petitions, by
condoning the non-production of certificates. It is stated across the
bar that the Writ Appeal in W.A.No.1329 of 2021, as against the
order in W.P.No.4866 of 2020, was dismissed by the Hon'ble
Division Bench of this Court on 14.06.2021.
http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.6571 of 2020
3. The issue now seems to be settled by the learned Single
Judge of this Court in G.Tamilarasi's case (supra) and the relevant
portion of the order reads as follows:-
“8. When the matter was taken up for hearing earlier, this Court has directed the Commission vide interim order dated 04.03.2020, to permit the petitioner to attend the counseling on any one of the dates scheduled without prejudice to the rights of the parties in the writ petition. Thereafter, it appears that the petitioner was permitted to participate in the counseling and the certificates as required by the Commission were also produced to the satisfaction of the Commission. Ultimately, the petitioner being found eligible for appointment in the category for which she laid her claim, the provisional appointment has also been issued appointing the petitioner as Junior Assistant in Public Health and Preventive Medicine Department, in pursuance of her selection pursuant to the subject Notification. However, the appointment is stated to be subject to the disposal of the present writ petition.
9. On behalf of the respondent Commission, a counter affidavit has been filed.
http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.6571 of 2020
In the counter affidavit, it is stated that when the candidates were informed of the selection procedure as stipulated in the Notification itself, it is the responsibility of the candidate to ensure that all the certificates were uploaded within the time stipulated by the Commission. As far as the Commission is concerned, the PSTM claim of the petitioner could not be considered in the absence of 10th Std certificate as a proof of petitioner having done her schooling in Tamil Medium of Instructions. Therefore, she could not be considered against the PSTM Quota.
10. Mr.NGR.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner cannot be faulted for the error, even assuming that the certificate in question has not been uploaded by the E-Seva Centre. The E~Seva Centre has in fact issued acknowledgment for having uploaded all the certificates, vide its receipt dated 07.12.2019. Therefore, the petitioner was under the bonafide impression that every requirement has been complied with.
11. In any event, he would submit that, now, the petitioner has been found to be eventually eligible for appointment and appointment order has also been issued, the writ
http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.6571 of 2020
petition may be disposed of in favour of the petitioner, taking note of the positive development.
12. Although in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner cannot be faulted with for not uploading 10th Std PSTM certificate, at the same time, the Commission cannot also be blamed for originally not considering the claim of the petitioner. As far as the Commission is concerned, the required certificate did not reach the Commission-s office and therefore, there was no scope for the Commission to consider the petitioner against PSTM Quota.
13. In any case, this Court has intervened and passed interim orders and on the basis of which, the petitioner was allowed to participate in the counseling provisionally and ultimately the petitioner has been favoured with the provisional appointment order also. When the petitioner is found to be fully eligible for appointment and being appointed also as Junior Assistant, this Court is of the view that, in all fairness, the issue must rest at that.
14. This Court is not inclined to fathom out
http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.6571 of 2020
as to who is to be blamed in the contention between petitioner and the respondent Commission for non availability of the certificate in question at the crucial time. According to this Court, such blame game is of no consequence, in view of the subsequent development wherein the petitioner has been issued a provisional appointment order.
15. In the above circumstances, the considered view of this Court is that the petitioner should be allowed to enjoy the fruition of the appointment without any strings attached to her appointment. This is particularly so, that the petitioner being a Destitute Widow, has earned her appointment in her own right.”
The aforesaid extract is self explanatory and the ratio laid down
therein is squarely applicable to the facts involved in the present
Writ Petition. As such, the petitioner herein would also be entitled
for the relief in accordance with the aforesaid order.
4. In the light of the above observations and the judgment of
this Court in G.Tamilarasi's case (supra), the petitioner's
candidature is directed to be included in the selection list for
http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.6571 of 2020
appointment to Group-IV posts, pursuant to the Notification No.19
of 2019 dated 14.06.2019. Consequently, there shall be a direction
to the concerned respondent/Government Department to issue
posting orders, as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within a
period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands allowed.
Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. There
shall be no orders as to costs.
22.09.2021 Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order Note:Issue order copy on 24.09.2021 DP
To
1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Road, VOC Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-600 003.
2.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Road, VOC Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-600 003.
http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.6571 of 2020
M.S.RAMESH,J.
DP
ORDER MADE IN W.P.No.6571 of 2020 and WMP.No.7790 of 2020
22.09.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!