Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19277 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2021
CMSA(MD).No.2&3 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 21.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
CMSA(MD).Nos. 2 and 3 of 2020
and
CMP(MD) No.602 of 2020
Ashok Viswanath ...Appellant in both petitions
Vs
A.Balanagini ...Respondent in both petitions
Prayer in CMSA(MD) No.2 of 2020:- This Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal
has been filed, under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act read with Section
100 of CPC, against the judgement and decree, dated, 03.11.2018 made in
HMCMA No.29 of 2017 on the file of the Additional District Court (Fast Track
Court) Tenkasi confirming the judgment and decree dated 20.03.2017 made in
HMOP No.165 of 2013 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi and allow
this Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal.
Prayer in CMSA(MD) No.3 of 2020:- This Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal
has been filed, under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act read with Section
100 of CPC, against the judgement and decree, dated, 03.11.2018 made in
HMCMA No.53 of 2017 on the file of the Additional District Court (Fast Track
Court) Tenkasi confirming the judgment and decree dated 20.03.2017 made in
HMOP No.32 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi and allow
this Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal.
1/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
CMSA(MD).No.2&3 of 2020
(In both petitions)
For Appellant : Mr.K. Appadurai
For Respondent : Mr.T.Selvan
ORDER
The Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal in 2 of 2020 has been filed
against the judgement and decree, dated, 03.11.2018 made in HMCMA No.29
of 2017 on the file of the Additional District Court (Fast Track Court) Tenkasi
confirming the judgment and decree dated 20.03.2017 made in HMOP No.165
of 2013 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi and the Civil
Miscellaneous Second Appeal in 3 of 2020 has been filed against the
judgement and decree, dated, 03.11.2018 made in HMCMA No.53 of 2017 on
the file of the Additional District Court (Fast Track Court) Tenkasi confirming
the judgment and decree dated 20.03.2017 made in HMOP No.32 of 2015 on
the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi.
2. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the marriage
between the appellant /husband and the respondent/wife was solemnized on
11.12.2005 and out of their wedlock they were blessed with a male child on
29.05.2007 named Devanarayanan and another female child on 11.10.2009
named as Sambavi. Thereafter due to misunderstanding they got separated
from the year 2010 and they have been living separately for the past 11 years
due to incompatibility and difference. The appellant / husband had filed HMOP
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CMSA(MD).No.2&3 of 2020
No. 165 of 2013 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi for dissolution of
marriage and the respondent /wife had filed a petition in HMOP No. 32 of 2015
on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi for restitution of conjugal rights.
The petition filed by the husband for dissolution of marriage was dismissed and
the petition filed by the wife was allowed by judgment and decree dated
20.03.2017. Against the dismissal, the appellant had filed an appeal in HMCMA
Nos.29 and 53 of 2017before the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track
Court, Tenkasi and the same has been dismissed by a common judgement
and decree dated 03.11.2018, against which the present appeals has been filed
by the appellant/husband.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant would further submit that the
appellant /husband earlier suffered from severe brain stroke and is now
continuously taking treatment under the care of Chief Medical Officer of Vijaya
Health Centre, Vadapalani, Chennai. He would further submit that the parties
have settled the matter and today, in open Court they have filed a joint memo
of compromise dated 21.09.2021 and he would pray that the suitable orders
may be passed in view of the joint compromise memo.
4. The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that parties have
decided to settle the issue, pursuant to which a joint memo of compromise has
been filed.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CMSA(MD).No.2&3 of 2020
5. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the joint
memo of compromise.
6. The parties have agreed for settlement and a joint compromise memo
has been filed before this Court, wherein it is stated that the appellant/husband
has already paid a sum of Rs. 50 lakhs as one time settlement towards welfare
of the children and wife/respondent. The relevant portion of the joint memo of
compromise is extracted hereunder:
" The appellant/husband and the respondent/wife married on 11.12.2005, out of the wedlock Devanarayanan, son and Sambavi daughter were born on 29.05.2007 and 11.10.2009 respectively.
2. Since 2010 both the appellant and the respondent separated from each other and living separately for the past 11 years due to incompatibility and differences. The respondent got return of jewels and sridana articles under valid receipt.
3. Appellant filed HMOP No. 165 of 2013 on the file of the learned Principal Sub Judge, Tenkasi for dissolution of marriage and the respondent filed HMOP No. 32 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi for restitution of conjugal rights. Petition for dissolution filed by the appellant/husband was dismissed and petition for restitution of conjugal rights was allowed by a common judgement dated 20.03.2017. The respondent/wife received Rs.11,000/- as maintenance pending the final decision of trial Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CMSA(MD).No.2&3 of 2020
4. Appellant filed two appeals in HMCMA Nos.29 and 53 of 2017 before the learned Additional District Judge (FTC) Tenkasi, against the said common judgment and decree of tiral Court. Both the appeals also got dismissed by a common judgment and decree dated 03.11.2018.
5. Appellant has filed two appeals in CMSA(MD) Nos. 2 and 3 of 2020 before this Hon'ble Court and the same are pending. Whileso, the appellant/husband suffered a brain stroke and taking treatment under the care of Chief Medical Officer of Vijaya Health Care, Vadapalani, Chennai. The medical records are enclosed for perusal.
6. In the given circumstances, at the intervention of the elders and wellwishers and to secure best interest of the child and that of the respondent wife, a compromise has been mooted and after negotiation talks the respondent agreed to received Rs.50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty lakhs) from the appellant as one time settlement and accordingly the appellant paid the said sum of Rs. 50,00,000/- in the following manner.
S.No Name of person Details of Bank, DD No and Date Amount Rs 1 Devanarayanan Karur Vysya Bank, 7,00,000/-
Rajapalayam Branch DD No.158862 DD.Sr.No.012383060582 dt. 23.02.2021 2 Devanarayanan Karur Vysya Bank, 7,00,000/-
Rajapalayam Branch DD No.158861 DD.Sr.No.012383060583 dt. 23.02.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CMSA(MD).No.2&3 of 2020
3 Devanarayanan Karur Vysya Bank, 6,00,000/-
Rajapalayam Branch
DD No.158860
DD.Sr.No.012383060584
dt. 23.02.2021
4 Sambavi Karur Vysya Bank, 7,00,000/-
Rajapalayam Branch
DD No.158859
DD.Sr.No.012383060579
dt. 23.02.2021
5 Sambavi Karur Vysya Bank, 7,00,000/-
Rajapalayam Branch
DD No.158858
DD.Sr.No.012383060580
dt. 23.02.2021
6 Sambavi Karur Vysya Bank, 6,00,000/-
Rajapalayam Branch
DD No.158857
DD.Sr.No.012383060581
dt. 23.02.2021
7 Balanagini City Union Bank, 10,00,000/-
Rajapalayam Branch
DD No. 027369
DD Sr.No.00027369
dt.23002.2021
Total 50,00,000/-
7. After receipt of the aforesaid demand draft and realization the respondent/wife also executed a supporting settlement document dated 24.02.2021 in favour of the appellant/husband in the presence of an Advocate Notary T.Murugiah Pandian that receipt of the aforesaid amount is a one time settlement towards maintenance for herself and two minor children and undertaking that she will not claim any amount towards any other amount form the appellant.
8. In view of the above settlement the appellant and respondent have jointly entered into this compromise and crave leave to file this Memorandum of joint
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CMSA(MD).No.2&3 of 2020
compromise praying this Hon'ble Court to pass final orders in the above appeal in the following terms:
i) The appellant and the respondent mutually agreed for this joint compromise in the best interest of the children and their welfare.
ii) The Joint Compromise reached without any threat or coercion or criminal intimidation against each other.
iii)The respondent admits receipt of Rs. 50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifth Lakhs only) from the appellant through demand drafts in the aforesaid manner.
iv) The respondent hereby agrees that receipt of said payment is one time settlement toward maintenance of respondent and her children and they have no present or further claim against appellant in respect of any matters
v)The appellant and the respondent agree that they will not proceed with any litigation in respect of their matrimonial dispute present or future and waive all their claims against each other.
vi) The respondent will take care of her children and there will be no further claim against the appellant by respondent on behalf of her children
vii)The parties agree for the final orders to be passed on the above terms of joint compromise, there is no collusion among them in filing this joint compromise and they have not suppressed any material facts or details before this Hon'ble Court.
It is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass final orders in the above appeals on the above terms jointly agreed by the parties to the above appeals and thus render justice ".
7. In view of the joint memo compromise , the common judgment and decree
dated 03.11.2018 passed by the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court,
Tenkasi is set aside. The common judgment and decree dated 20.03.2017
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CMSA(MD).No.2&3 of 2020
passed in HMOP No. 165 of 2013 and HMOP No.32 of 2015 on the file of the
Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi is also set aside. The petition filed by the
husband in HMOP No. 165 of 2015 is decreed in terms of the joint memo of
compromise, which would also form part and parcel of the decree.
8.In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeals stand allowed. No
costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
21.09.2021
Index:Yes/No Web:Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking aav
To
1. The Additional District Court (Fast Track Court) Tenkasi
2. The Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi
3. The Record Keeper VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CMSA(MD).No.2&3 of 2020
A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA J.
aav
CMSA(MD).Nos. 2 and 3 of 2020 and CMP(MD) No.602 of 2020
21.09.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!