Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Veeramuthu vs The Director Of Municipal ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 18320 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18320 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 September, 2021

Madras High Court
Veeramuthu vs The Director Of Municipal ... on 7 September, 2021
                                                                           W.P.(MD) No.5995 of 2019

                             BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 07.09.2021

                                                     CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR

                                             W.P.(MD)No.5995 of 2019

                 Veeramuthu,                                                   ... Petitioner
                                                        vs.


                 1.The Director of Municipal Administration,
                   Chepauk,
                   Chennai.

                 2.Deputy Director of Municipal Administration,
                   Thanjavur.

                 3.The Municipal Commissioner,
                   Municipal Office,
                   Pudukkottai.                                                ... Respondents



                 PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
                 issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to
                 impugned order dated 31.12.2018 in A.T hi.Mu.No:C1/11786/2018 of the 3rd
                 respondent and quash the same and consequently appoint the petitioner in any
                 suitable post under the compassionate appointment in the 3rd respondent office.


                 1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                W.P.(MD) No.5995 of 2019



                                               For Petitioner     : Mr.J.Anandkumar
                                               For R-1 & R-2    : Mr.A.K.Manikkam,
                                                                  Standing Counsel for the State
                                               For R-3          : Mr.P.Mahendran,
                                                                  Standing Counsel for R3
                                                           *****

                                                         ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying for issuance of

a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to impugned

order dated 31.12.2018 in A.T hi.Mu.No:C1/11786/2018 of the 3rd respondent and

quash the same and consequently appoint the petitioner in any suitable post under

the compassionate appointment in the 3rd respondent office.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned

Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

3. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final

disposal at the admission stage itself.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD) No.5995 of 2019

4. According to the petitioner, his father, who was working as Sweeper

in the respondent Municipality, died in harness on 04.10.2008 and after his death,

the family was put to suffer to eke out livelihood. Hence, the petitioner applied to

the 3rd respondent in the year 2010 for grant of compassionate appointment to him

and he produced all the documents including no objection from other legal heirs

of the deceased employee and thereafter, he was approaching the respondent, but

no positive reply was forthcoming from him. Again the petitioner sent a

representation dated 27.11.2018 to the respondents. However, by the impugned

order dated 29.11.2018, the respondent rejected the claim of the petitioner.

Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has come forward with the present Writ

Petition.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner

made application in the year 2010 and he also submitted an application on

23.12.2009 addressed to the Chief Minister's Cell which is well within the

prescribed time and the same was forwarded to the Special Officer, who in turn

advised to approach the concerned authority and thereafter, the petitioner made

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD) No.5995 of 2019

application, but it was rejected, which cannot be sustained.

6. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondent would

submit that the petitioner has made representation belatedly after the prescribed

period of three years and by relying on G.O.Ms.No.120 Labour and Employment

Department, dated 26.06.1995, the 3rd respondent has rightly rejected the

application made by the petitioner. He disputed the application sent to the Chief

Minister cell as there is no proper seal and acknowledge and hence, the same

cannot be relied on.

7. An identical issue came up before the Honourable Division Bench

of this Court in W.A.No.1749 of 2019 (Sudhanthira Devi vs. The State of Tamil

Nadu and others) by Judgment dated 03.09.2019, following the decisions of the

Honourable Supreme Court, has held that applications for compassionate

appointment submitted beyond the period of three years cannot be entertained.

8. The Honourable Full Bench in Paragraph No.13 of the Judgment dated

11.03.2020 in W.P.(MD) No.7016 of 2011 has held as follows:

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD) No.5995 of 2019

“13. In the light of the above we find that the judgment in the case of A.Kamatchi v. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, (2013) 2 CWC 758 is not only contrary to the law laid down in the case of E.Ramasamy v. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, (2006) 4 MLJ 1080, but it also has, as indicated by our brother, Justice Subramonium Prasad, in his judgment, misconstrued the same. In view of what has been indicated above we are also of the view that the period of three years is a rationale and reasonable period under the relevant Government Orders and the rules. We may, however, observe that it is open to the State Government to make any provision for relaxation of the period in exceptionally rare cases on the principles as indicated herein above.”

9. Admittedly, the petitioner has not made the application within the time

limit as prescribed in G.O.Ms.No.120 Labour and Employment Department,

dated 26.06.1995 as per which, the application for appointment on

compassionate grounds should be made within three years of the death of

Government Servant. But the petitioner made the representation only on

27.11.2018, i.e. beyond the prescribed time limit. In the absence of the material

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD) No.5995 of 2019

to show that the petitioner made application in time, this Court cannot extend the

benefit contrary to the terms of the G.O.

10. In the light of the above decisions supra, no relief can be granted be

granted as there is no illegality in the impugned order of the 3 rd respondent dated

31.12.2018 in A.T hi.Mu.No:C1/11786/2018. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is

dismissed. No costs.

07.09.2021 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes

dn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD) No.5995 of 2019

To

1.The Director of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai.

2.Deputy Director of Municipal Administration, Thanjavur.

3.The Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Office, Pudukkottai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD) No.5995 of 2019

D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.

dn

Order made in W.P.(MD) No.5995 of 2019

07.09.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter