Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Managing Director vs K.Sivakumar
2021 Latest Caselaw 20203 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20203 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 October, 2021

Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs K.Sivakumar on 1 October, 2021
                                                                          C.M.A.No.1943 of 2021 etc.,

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 01.10.2021

                                                      CORAM:

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                         C.M.A.Nos.1943, 1945 & 1946 of 2021
                                      and C.M.P.Nos.10469, 10474 & 10476 of 2021

                  The Managing Director,
                  Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (VPM) Ltd.,
                  Villupuram Division - I,
                  Villupuram.                        .. Appellant in all the CMAs

                                                         Vs.

                  K.Sivakumar                             .. Respondent in C.M.A.No.1943/2021

                  1. K.Seenu
                  2. Minor Nandhin,
                  3. Minor Karithika
                  4. Minor Ragavan
                  (R2 to R4 rep by their
                    NF & NG, R1)                          ..Respondents in C.M.A.No.1945/2021

                  Minor Ragavan
                  (Respondent rep by his NF &
                    NG Mr.K.Seenu)                        .. Respondent in C.M.A.No.1946/2021


                  Prayer in all the CMAs: Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section
                  173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1989 seeking to set aside the judgment and
                  decree dated 30.01.2020 made in M.C.O.P.No.233 of 2017, M.C.O.P.No.259
                  of 2017 and M.C.O.P.No.255 of 2017 respectively on the file of Motor
                  Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Subordinate Court, Tiruvannamalai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                  1/8
                                                                               C.M.A.No.1943 of 2021 etc.,

                                    For Appellant             : Mr.K.J.Sivakumar
                                    in all the CMAs
                                                          -----

COMMON JUDGMENT (The case has been heard through video conference)

These appeals have been filed by the Transport Corporation

challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents

Claims Tribunal, Special Subordinate Court, Tiruvannamalai in the common

award dated 30.01.2020, passed in M.C.O.P.Nos.233, 259 and 255 of 2017.

2. M.C.O.P.Nos.233 and 259 of 2017 are fatal accident claims. In

M.C.O.P.No.233 of 2017, the deceased was aged 22 years old and the

deceased in M.C.O.P.No.259 of 2017, was aged 25 years old.

M.C.O.P.No.255 of 2017, pertains to the claim made by a 7 days old baby

for the injuries sustained by him. Both the deceased were labourers. The

Tribunal under the impugned award directed the appellant transport

corporation to pay the respective claimants compensation as detailed

hereunder:

M.C.O.P.No.233 of 2017

Sl. Heads Amount in Rs.

No.

                        1. Loss of Income                                                    9,82,800

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                                                                                 C.M.A.No.1943 of 2021 etc.,


                        Sl.                            Heads                           Amount in Rs.
                        No.
                        2. Loss of consortium                                                    40,000
                        3. Loss of estate                                                        15,000
                        4. Funeral expenses                                                      15,000
                              Total                                                          10,52,800



                                                 M.C.O.P.No.259 of 2017

                        Sl.                            Heads                           Amount in Rs.
                        No.
                        1. Loss of Income                                                    14,74,200
                        2. Loss of consortium                                                    40,000
                        3. Loss of love and affection to R2 to R4 (30,000 x 3)                   90,000
                        4. Loss of estate                                                        15,000
                        5. Funeral expenses                                                      15,000
                              Total                                                          10,52,800



                                                 M.C.O.P.No.255 of 2017

                        Sl.                            Heads                           Amount in Rs.
                        No.
                        1. Lump sum compensation                                                 35,000
                              Total                                                              35,000



3. The cause of the accident has not been disputed by the appellant

transport corporation. In these appeals, they have only disputed the quantum

of compensation awarded by the Tribunal to the respective claimants. The

accident happened on 03.12.2016. In the claim petitions filed by the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.1943 of 2021 etc.,

dependents of the deceased, they have pleaded that the respective deceased

was earning Rs.9,000/- p.m. According to the claimants, the deceased were

building workers. In M.C.O.P.No.233 of 2017, the deceased was aged 22

years and in M.C.O.P.No.259 of 2017, the deceased was aged 25 years. In

M.C.O.P.No.255 of 2017, the injured victim was a seven day old baby. In so

far as the fatal accident case claimants are concerned, the Tribunal has fixed

the notional monthly income of the deceased at Rs.6,500/-. The accident

happened in the year 2016, after giving due consideration to the year of the

accident, this Court is of the considered view that the assessment of the

notional monthly income of the deceased at Rs.6,500/- cannot be considered

to be excessive in both the fatal accident cases. The Tribunal has adopted

the correct multiplier of 18, since the respective deceased were aged 22 years

and 25 years respectively. Only by adopting the correct multiplier and by

assessing the correct monthly income, the Tribunal has assessed the loss of

dependency to the claimants in M.C.O.P.Nos.233 & 259 of 2017.

4. In so far as M.C.O.P.No.233 of 2017 is concerned, the Tribunal has

assessed the loss of income at Rs.9,82,800/- and has also added loss of future

prospectus, which is the correct assessment and therefore the same is

confirmed by this Court. So far as the award of compensation of Rs.40,000/- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.1943 of 2021 etc.,

towards loss of consortium, Rs.15,000/- towards loss of estate and

Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses for the claimants in M.C.O.P.No.233

of 2017, it cannot be considered to be excessive as alleged by the appellant

transport corporation and therefore, the same is also confirmed by this Court.

The total compensation awarded by the Tribunal to the claimants in

M.C.O.P.No.233 of 2017 at Rs.10,52,800/- cannot be considered to be

excessive as alleged by the appellant transport corporation and therefore the

same is confirmed by this Court.

5. In so far as M.C.O.P.No.259 of 2017 is concerned, which is also a

fatal accident claim, the Tribunal similarly as assessed the notional monthly

income at Rs.6,500/- for the deceased who is also a building worker. The

Tribunal has also adopted the correct multiplier of 18 and also rightly

awarded loss of future prospects at 40% and only thereafter has assessed the

loss of income to the claimants in M.C.O.P.No.259 of 2017 at

Rs.14,74,200/- and the same is confirmed by this Court. So far as the award

of compensation of Rs.40,000/- towards loss of consortium, Rs.90,000/-

towards loss of love and affection, Rs.15,000/- towards loss of estate and

Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses for the claimants in M.C.O.P.No.259

of 2017, it cannot be considered to be excessive as alleged by the appellant https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.1943 of 2021 etc.,

transport corporation and therefore, the same is also confirmed by this Court.

The total compensation awarded by the Tribunal to the claimants in

M.C.O.P.No.233 of 2017 at Rs.16,34,200/- cannot be considered to be

excessive as alleged by the appellant transport corporation and therefore the

same is also confirmed by this Court.

6. So far as the compensation awarded by the Tribunal for the injured

victim who is a seven days old baby in M.C.O.P.No.255 of 2017 is

concerned, the Tribunal has awarded a lump sum compensation of

Rs.35,000/- after giving due consideration to the nature of injuries sustained

by the claimant. This Court does not find any infirmity in the findings of the

Tribunal and the same is also confirmed by this Court.

7. For the foregoing discussions, there is no merit in the appeals and

accordingly all the appeals are dismissed and the impugned orders dated

30.01.2020 made in M.C.O.P.No.233 of 2017, M.C.O.P.No.259 of 2017 and

M.C.O.P.No.255 of 2017 respectively on the file of Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal, Special Subordinate Court, Tiruvannamalai are hereby confirmed.

The appellant transport corporation is directed to deposit the award amount

along with interest and costs, less the amount already deposited, if any, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.1943 of 2021 etc.,

within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment to the credit of M.C.O.P.Nos.233, 259 and 255 of 2017

respectively, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special

Subordinate Court, Tiruvannamalai. On such deposit of the compensation

amount, the claimants are permitted to withdraw their respective award

amount as directed by the Tribunal along with interest and costs, less the

amount, if any, already withdrawn by making necessary applications before

the Tribunal. So far as the amount awarded to the minor claimants are

concerned, the amount should be deposited in a fixed deposit in a

nationalised bank as directed by the Tribunal and the accrued interest shall

be withdrawn as directed by the Tribunal. Consequently, the connected

miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

01.10.2021 Index : Yes / No kk

To

1. The Special Subordinate Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tiruvannamalai.

2. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.1943 of 2021 etc.,

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

kk

C.M.A.Nos.1943, 1945 & 1946 of 2021 and C.M.P.Nos.10469, 10474 & 10476 of 2021

01.10.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter