Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. ... vs G.Sivaraj
2021 Latest Caselaw 20178 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20178 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 October, 2021

Madras High Court
Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. ... vs G.Sivaraj on 1 October, 2021
                                                                           C.M.A.No.2817 of 2021

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 01.10.2021

                                                     CORAM:

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
                                               and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

                                              C.M.A. No. 2817 of 2021
                                                       and
                                              C.M.P.No.16113 of 2021

                     HDFC ERGO General Insurance Co. Ltd.,
                     RR Towers II, 2nd Floor, No.94/95,
                     T.V.K. Industrial Estate, Guindy,
                     Chennai - 600 032.                                         ... Appellant

                     (Accepted the cause title vide order of this Court dated 20.12.2020 made in
                     C.M.P.No.27547 of 2019 in C.M.A.SR.No.107156 of 2019)

                                                         Vs

                     1. G.Sivaraj.

                     2. V.Sivadasan

                     3. Sri Venkateswara Carbonic Gases Pvt. Ltd.,
                        At No. 9/84, Lajapathirai Street,
                        Srinivasapuram, Coimbatore - 641 009.                 ... Respondents




                     1/10



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                              C.M.A.No.2817 of 2021

                     Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
                     Vehicles Act, 1988, against the award and decree dated 24.10.2018 made in
                     M.C.O.P.No.1983 of 2014 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims
                     Tribunal, Coimbatore.


                                   For Appellant              : Mr. S.Arun Kumar
                                   For 1st Respondent         : Mr.G.Vanjinathan
                                                                for Mr. T.Maharajan

                                                     JUDGMENT

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the

judgment and award passed by the learned Special Subordinate Judge,

Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Coimbatore, in M.C.O.P.No.1983 of

2014.

2. This is a case of injury. The first respondent herein filed a

claim petition seeking compensation of Rs.60,00,000 /- (Rupees Sixty lakhs

only) against the appellant in M.C.O.P.No.1983 of 2014. It is the case of the

claimant that on 17.08.2014, when he was travelling in the the Tamil Nadu

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.2817 of 2021

State Transport Corporation bus bearing registration No. TN 38 N 2288

from his residence to his work place at Coimbatore, a tanker lorry bearing

registration number TN 38 BD 1399, which was driven by the driver in a

negligent manner, rammed the TNSTC bus. In the impact, he sustained

grievous injuries. Immediately he was taken to Ganga Medical Centre and

Hospital Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore, where he take treatment as an in-patient

from 17.08.2014 to 22.09.2014.

3. The claimant/1st respondent further stated that he completed

his M.A and M.Phil and he was working as Manager in Born Babies

Sivasakthi Baby Garments Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore and he was earning

Rs.30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand only) per mensem.

4.The claim petition was resisted by the appellant interalia

contending that the driver of the bus was responsible for the accident, hence

no liability can be fixed on the insurance company. It is further stated that

the claim is exorbitant and fanciful.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.2817 of 2021

5.Before the Tribunal, in order to establish the claimant's case,

the claimant was examined as PW1 and S.P.Chandrasekar was examined as

P.W.2 and Exs.P1 to P19 were marked. On behalf of the Insurance

Company, R.W.1 was examined and Exs.R1 & R2 were marked.

6.The claimant was a witness to the accident and no contra

evidence was produced on behalf of the appellant. The Tribunal relying

upon the evidence of P.W.1 and the documents referred above, has rightly

came to the conclusion that the driver of the lorry was responsible for the

accident.

7.In so far as quantum is concerned, the claimant has stated that

he was 38 years old, at the time of accident. He further stated that he was

employed as Manager in Born Babies Sivasakthi Baby Garments Pvt. Ltd.,

Coimbatore and he was paid Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) per

mensem. In support of his claim towards his monthly salary, he marked the

salary certificate-Ex.P.9 for the month of March 2013. It is seen that for the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.2817 of 2021

next succeeding month he was paid only Rs.15,500/- (Rupees fifteen

thousand five hundred only). He also examined P.W.2 to prove that he was

working part time in Sree Vedhathri Fashions at Tiruppur, for which he was

paid Rs.12,500/- (Rupees twelve thousand five hundred only). Ex.P.18 is the

salary certificate.

8.The Tribunal, after considering the oral and documentary

evidence, held that the 2nd respondent was responsible for the accident and

awarded compensation of Rs.35,88,140/-.

9.Assailing the said finding, the appellant/Insurance Company

has come up with this appeal.

10.The learned counsel for the appellant, Mr.S.Arunkumar

submitted that in the claim petition there is absolutely no pleading that the

claimant was working in two different companies. Only during the trial,

P.W.2 was examined to show that the claimant is working in another

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.2817 of 2021

company, thereby he was earning Rs.12,500/- (Rupees twelve thousand five

hundred only) and hence the evidence of the PW2 and ExP.18 would not

improve the case of the claimant.

11.Learned counsel appearing for the claimant supported and

justified the conclusion reached by the tribunal.

12.We find force in the submission of the learned counsel for

the appellant. As rightly pointed out by him, the claimant has not mentioned

about his employment in two different companies, in the claim petition as

well as in the proof affidavit. Therefore, it would be highly unsafe to rely on

the evidence of P.W.2 and Ex.P.18 to determine the salary. The Tribunal has

taken his monthly income as Rs.25,000/- based on the testimony of P.Ws.1

and 2 and Exs.P.9 and 18. Considering the age and qualification of the

claimant and the employment in Born Babies Sivasakthi Baby Garments

Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore, this Court fixes the monthly salary of the claimant as

Rs.15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only). Adding 40% towards his future

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.2817 of 2021

prospectus, the total income comes to Rs.21,000/- (Rupees twenty one

thousand only) per mensem.

13.The claimant produced Ex.C.1-Disability Certificate,

wherein it has been stated that the claimant has been suffered 67 % partial

and permanent disability. Though it is contended by the learned counsel for

the appellant, that the claimant has not produced any material to show that

he lost his employment. Considering the injuries sustained by the claimant

and nature of employment, it would be appropriate to take the disability as

50%, by applying the multiple of 15, the loss of earning capacity is arrived

at Rs.18,90,000/- (Rupees eighteen lakhs ninety thousand only) (21000 x

12 x 15 x 50/100).

14.The Tribunal has awarded Rs.3,48,000/- towards medical

expenses based on Ex.P.12; Rs.2,00,000/- towards pain and sufferings;

Rs.10,000/- for transportation to hospital; Rs.10,000/- for extra nourishment

and Rs.5,000/- towards damage to the clothes. But no amount has been

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.2817 of 2021

awarded for the attendant charges and loss of amenities . Hence Rs.50,000/-

is awarded for attendant charges and Rs.25,000/- towards loss of amenities.

15.Accordingly, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal to

the claimant is re-quantified as follows:-

                                      Heads              Amount           Amount           Award
                                                      awarded by the    awarded by       confirmed/
                                                        Tribunal         this Court      enhanced/
                                                                                          reduced/
                                                          (Rs.)             (Rs.)         granted

Future loss of earning Rs.30,15,000/- Rs.18,90,000/- reduced capacity Medical Bills Rs.3,48,140/- Rs.3,48,140/- confirmed Pain and Suffering Rs.2,00,000/- Rs.2,00,000/- confirmed Transportation to Rs.10,000/- Rs.10,000/- confirmed Hospital Extra Nourishment Rs.10,000/- Rs.10,000/- confirmed Damage to Clothing Rs.5,000/- Rs.5,000/- confirmed Attendant charges - Rs.50,000/- granted Loss of amenities - Rs.25,000/- granted Total Rs.35,88,140/- Rs.25,38,140/- reduced

16. In fine, this civil miscellaneous appeal is partly allowed by

reducing the award amount from Rs.35,88,140/- to Rs.25,38,140/- (Rupees

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.2817 of 2021

twenty five lakhs thirty eight thousand one hundred and fourty only). The

appellant/Insurance Company is directed to deposit the above modified

award amount with interest at the rate of 7.5 % p.a., from the date of the

claim petition till the date of its realization, less the amount already

deposited if any, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a

copy of this order. On such deposit, the claimant is permitted to withdraw

the entire amount. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous

petition is closed.

                                                                 (M.K.K.S.J.,)      (V.S.G.J.,)
                                                                           01.10.2021
                     Index:Yes/No
                     Internet:Yes/No
                     Speaking Order: Yes/No
                     ham/jer
                     To

                     1. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                        Special Subordinate Court, Coimbatore.

                     2. The Section Officer,
                        V.R.Section, High Court, Madras – 104.








https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                           C.M.A.No.2817 of 2021




                                   K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.
                                                     and
                                         V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

                                                             Jer




                                       C.M.A. No. 2817 of 2021
                                                           and
                                       C.M.P.No.16113 of 2021




                                                    01.10.2021






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter