Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Akshera Paper vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2021 Latest Caselaw 23287 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23287 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2021

Madras High Court
Akshera Paper vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 29 November, 2021
                                                                          WP No.13280 of 2016

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 29-11-2021

                                                     CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                             WP No.13280 of 2016
                                                     And
                                         WMP Nos.11654 and 11655 of 2016


                     Akshera Paper, HT SC No.102,
                     SF No.557/5, Bhavanisagar Road,
                     Pasuvapalayam,
                     Rajan Nagar,
                     Sathy (TK) – 638 451,
                     Represented by its Factory Manager S.Feroz.     ..     Petitioner

                                                        vs.


                     1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
                       Represented by its Secretary to Government,
                       Energy Department,
                       Fort St. George,
                       Chennai – 600 009.

                     2.The Chairman and Managing Director,
                       TANGEDCO Ltd.,
                       144, Anna Salai,
                       Chennai – 600 002.




                     1/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                WP No.13280 of 2016

                     3.The Superintending Engineer,
                       TANGEDCO Ltd.,
                       Gobi Electricity Distribution Circle,
                       GOBI.                                        ..       Respondents

                                  Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the
                     second and third respondents from demanding and collecting the tax on
                     maximum demand charges from the petitioner in H.T.Sc.No.102, as per the
                     orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, New Delhi on 31.08.2012 in
                     SLP (C) No.24993 of 2012 and 25522 of 2012 etc., batch in M/s.Sri Krishna
                     Alloys and Etc. vs. Union of India and others etc.

                                  For Petitioner               : Mr.S.P.Parthasarathy

                                  For Respondent-1             : Mr.C.Selvaraj,
                                                                 Additional Government Pleader.

                                  For Respondents-2 and 3   : Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh,
                                                              Standing Counsel for TANGEDCO.


                                                       ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for the issue of Writ of

Mandamus forbearing the respondents 2 and 3 from demanding and

collecting tax on maximum demand charges from the petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.13280 of 2016

2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that a batch of

Special Leave petitions are pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and

the Hon'ble Supreme Court has passed an interim order dated 31.08.2012,

restraining the respondents from taking any coercive steps for disconnecting

supply of electricity subject to the petitioners paying all the charges/dues

except the tax calculated on the basis of maximum demand.

3. This Court had an occasion to deal with a similar issue in

WP No.19104 of 2020 and final orders were passed on 17.02.2021. The

relevant portions in the order are extracted hereunder :-

“5. Mr.N.Damodaran, learned Standing Counsel, who took notice on behalf of the respondents would submit that by following the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, a Division Bench of this Court has disposed of issue on the following terms:-

“In view of the issue raised in the present writ appeal / writ petition being settled against the appellant / petitioner in terms of the Division Bench judgment in W.P.Nos. 159 of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.13280 of 2016

2008 etc.(Batch) decided on 15.06.2012 and thereafter, the Hon'ble Supreme Court having entertained the Special Leave Appeals against the said judgment bearing Special Leave Appeal (Civil) Nos.

24685 to 24719 of 2012 dated 31.08.2012, with an interim direction restraining the respondent from taking any coercive steps for disconnecting the supply of electricity to the premises of the petitioner therein, subject to that petitioner paying all the charges / dues except tax calculated on the basis of maximum demand, it is agreed that the present writ appeal and writ petition be disposed of in terms aforesaid, with the agreement that the ultimate fate of the matter before the Hon'ble Supreme Court would also govern the present appellant and the writ petitioner and the same interim order would continue to enure for the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.13280 of 2016

benefit of the writ appeal and writ petitioner during the pendency of the Special Leave Appeals.

2. Writ Appeal and Writ Petition, accordingly, stand disposed of. No

of 2004 stands closed.”

6. On the issue of collecting tax on maximum demand charges from the petitioner in the High Tension Service Connection, the Hon'ble Supreme Court and a Division Bench of this Court has already issued a direction, restraining the respondents from taking any coercive steps for disconnecting supply of electricity to the premises of the petitioner subject to the petitioner paying all the charges / dues except tax calculated on the basis of maximum demand.”

4. The above order will also enure to the benefit of the

petitioners. In view of the same, the present writ petition is disposed of in

terms of the interim order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the

subsequent Hon'ble Division Bench order passed in W.A No.547 of 2004

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.13280 of 2016

dated 02.06.2015. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

29-11-2021 Index : Yes/No.

Internet : Yes/No.

Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order. Svn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.13280 of 2016

To

1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Energy Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Chairman and Managing Director, TANGEDCO Ltd., 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

3.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO Ltd., Gobi Electricity Distribution Circle, GOBI.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.13280 of 2016

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Svn

WP 13280 of 2016

29-11-2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter