Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

New India Assurance Company ... vs Santhi
2021 Latest Caselaw 23049 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23049 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2021

Madras High Court
New India Assurance Company ... vs Santhi on 25 November, 2021
                                                                           C.M.A.(MD).No.359 of 2019

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATE : 25.11.2021

                                                       CORAM :

                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

                                            C.M.A.(MD).No359 of 2019


                  New India Assurance Company Limited,
                  Through its Ramnad Branch Manager,
                  High Sports Building 1st Floor,
                  Old No.147, New No.186, Salai Road,
                  Ramanathapuram-623 501.             ... Appellant/Respondent No.3


                                                         Vs.


                  1.Santhi
                  2.Mahandhiran
                  3.Chitra
                  4.Seetha                               ... 1st to 4th Respondents/Petitioners

                  5.Ananth                               ... 5th Respondent/1st Respondent
                  6.Nagarajan                            ... 6th Respondent/2nd Respondent

                  PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
                  Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.
                  30 of 2015 dated 20.08.2018 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims
                  Tribunal, Sub-Court, Devakottai.
                                       For Appellant     :Mr.J.S.Murali
                                       For R1 to R4      :Mr.A.L.Kannan
                                       For R5 & R6       : No appearance


                 1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              C.M.A.(MD).No.359 of 2019

                                                      JUDGMENT

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the judgment

and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.30 of 2015, dated 20.08.2018 on the file of

the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub-Court, Devakottai.

2.In the affidavit it is stated that the accident took place on 02.03.2014

at about 03.00 p.m., while the deceased was coming from Devakottai to his

home through his motor cycle bearing Registration No.TN-05-P 2613, a lorry

bearing Registration No.TN-65-R 3366 was coming from the opposite

direction, driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner and dashed

against the deceased. Due to which, the deceased sustained grievous head

injuries and on the way to hospital, the deceased died. The claimants of the

deceased filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.30 of 2015 seeking

compensation of Rs.23,57,000/-.

3.Before the Tribunal, on the side of the claimants, two witnesses were

examined as P.Ws.1 & 2 and six documents were marked as Exs.P.1 to P.6

and on the side of the respondents, one witness was examined as R.W.1 and

one document was marked as Ex.R.1.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD).No.359 of 2019

4.The Tribunal, after considering the pleadings, oral and documentary

evidence and the arguments advanced by the counsel for the claimants and

the respondent and also on appreciating the evidence on record, held that the

appellant/Insurance Company is directed to pay a sum of Rs.19,42,000/- as

compensation. Aggrieved over the same, the appellant/Insurance Company

has filed the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

5.Heard Mr.J.S.Murali, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and

Mr.A.L.Kannan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 and

perused the material documents available on record.

6.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant/Insurance Company

submitted that without any proof the Tribunal had fixed the monthly income

of the deceased as Rs.12,000/- per month, is contrary to law. At the time of

accident, the deceased was running a Chicken Shop, but in this regard, no

document has been filed to prove the same. The appellant/Insurance

Company has also disputed the monthly income of the deceased fixed by the

Tribunal, in the counter affidavit. Hence, he prays to modify the award of the

Tribunal.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD).No.359 of 2019

7.Since no document was filed by the claimants to prove the monthly

income of the deceased, this Court is inclined to reduce the monthly income

of the deceased at Rs.10,000/- and added 25% of the future prospects.

Therefore, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal stands revised from

Rs.Rs.19,42,000/- to Rs.17,50,000/- in the manner stated below:

                  S.No.           Description                                      Awarded by
                                                      Amount awarded by            this Court
                                                  Tribunal         This Court
                  1.          Loss of Income      Rs.18,72,000/-   Rs.15,60,000/- (Modified)
                  2.          Loss of love and Rs.40,000/-         Rs.1,60,000/- (Modified)
                              affection of the first               (each
                              petitioner                           petitioner Rs.
                                                                   40,000/-)
                  3.          Funeral Expenses    Rs.15,000/-      Rs.15,000/-     (Confirmed)
                  4.          For Ambulance       Rs.15,000/-      Rs.15,000/-     (Confirmed)

Rs.19,42,000/- Rs.17,50,000/- (Reduced) Total Compensation

8.In view of the above, the judgment and decree of the trial Court

passed in M.C.O.P.No.30 of 2015 are modified and the compensation is

reduced from Rs.19,42,000/- to Rs.17,50,000/- and the Civil Miscellaneous

Appeal is allowed in part. The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the

modified amount of Rs.17,50,000/-, if already not deposited, within a period

of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, along with

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD).No.359 of 2019

interest at the rate of 7.5% p.a. The claimants are permitted to withdraw their

shares with accrued interests, as apportioned by the Tribunal. The excess

amount, if any, shall be refunded to the appellant/Insurance Company. No

costs.

25.11.2021

Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No To

1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/ Sub Court, Devakottai.

2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD).No.359 of 2019

S.ANANTHI, J.

Ns

Common Judgment made in C.M.A.(MD).No359 of 2019

25.11.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter