Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Secretary vs A.Umadevi
2021 Latest Caselaw 22461 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22461 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 November, 2021

Madras High Court
The Secretary vs A.Umadevi on 16 November, 2021
                                                      1

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             DATED: 16.11.2021

                                                    CORAM:

                     THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                          AND
                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

                                        W.A(MD)NO.1788 OF 2021
                                                  and
                                        C.M.P(MD)No.7684 of 2021

                     1.The Secretary,
                       Government of Tamil Nadu,
                       School Education Department,
                       Fort St.George,
                       Chennai – 600 009.

                     2.The Director of School Education,
                       DPI Campus, College Road,
                       Chennai – 600 006.

                     3.The Director of Elementary Education,
                       School Education, DPI Campus,
                       College Road, Chennai-600 006. :Appellants/Respondents 1 to 3


                                             .vs.


                     A.Umadevi                            : Respondent/Writ Petitioner

                     PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                     praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in
                     W.P(MD)No.8284 of 2020 dated 29.7.2020.


                                  For Appellants           :MrM.Siddharthan
                                                            Addl.Govt.Pleader

                                  For Respondent           :Mr.G.Anto

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                             2

                                                    JUDGMENT

*************

[Judgment of the Court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.]

Originally, the Writ Petition was filed seeking issuance of a

Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to regularize the

Petitioners' service from the initial deate of appointment till

1.6.2006, with all consquential monetary and service benefits of

Teachers in the light of the judgment of this Court made in W.P.No.

4991 of 2015, dated 20.07.2015.

2.The said Writ Petition was disposed of by the learned Single

Judge by directing the authorities to consider the representation of

the Petitioners in the light of the Division Bench Judgment in

W.A.No.3904 of 2019, dated 13.01.2020. Instead of complying with

the orders given by this Court, the above Writ Appeal is filed.

3.In the meanwhile, the said W.A.No.3904 of 2019 was

reviewed by the Division Bench of this Court and the order made

in the Writ Appeal was set aside, which made the order originally

passed in W.P.No.4991 of 2015 incapable of being implemented.

4.In view of the subsequent developments and the order

which was passed in Rev.Aplc.No.60 of 2020 in W.A.No.3904 of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2020 and W.A.Nos.723 of 2020 etc batch, dated 17.08.2021, the

appellants are directed to consider and pass orders on the

representation of the respondent herein, dated 7.6.2020 in the light

of the order passed in the above referred Rev.Aplc.No.60 of 2020,

dated 17.08.2021 within a period of four weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order.

5.With the above direction, the Writ Appeal stands disposed

of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is

closed.

[P.S.N.,J.] [P.V.,J.] 16.11.2021

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vsn

Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

AND P.VELMURUGAN, J.

vsn

JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)NO.1788 OF 2021 and C.M.P(MD)No.7684 of 2021

16.11.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter