Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.Mustafa vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
2021 Latest Caselaw 22441 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22441 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 November, 2021

Madras High Court
A.Mustafa vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 16 November, 2021
                                                                      W.P(MD)Nos.3313 to 3315 of 2018


                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 16.11.2021

                                                    CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

                                         W.P.(MD) Nos.3313 to 3315 of 2018

                In W.P(MD)No.3313 of 2018:
                A.Mustafa                                               ... Petitioner
                                                        Vs.
                1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government,
                Fiannce (Pay Cell) Department,
                Fort St. George,
                Chennai – 600 009.

                2. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                Rep. by its Secretary to Government,
                Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department,
                Fort. St. George,
                Chennai – 600 009.

                3.The Commissioner of Rural Development,
                And Panchayat Raj Department,
                Panagal Building,
                Saidapet, Chennai 600 01

                4. The District Collector (PD Section),
                Sivagangai District.                                    ...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to revise the scales of pay of the petitioner as per G.O.Ms.No.71 (Finance) Pay Cell dated 26.02.2011, in accordance with directions given in Para 51(vi) of the judgment rendered by

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)Nos.3313 to 3315 of 2018

Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.504/2013 dated 27.02.2014 with all consequential benefits such as revised pension, arrears of pension and salary as the case may be within time frame by this Court.

In W.P(MD)No.3314 of 2018:

                S.Ramamoorthy                                           ... Petitioner
                                                      Vs.
                1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,

Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Fiannce (Pay Cell) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

2. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Fort. St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

3.The Commissioner of Rural Development, And Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai 600 01

4. The District Collector (PD Section), Sivagangai District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to revise the scales of pay of the petitioner as per G.O.Ms.No.71 (Finance) Pay Cell dated 26.02.2011, in accordance with directions given in Para 51(vi) of the judgment rendered by Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.504/2013 dated 27.02.2014 with all consequential benefits such as revised pension, arrears of pension and salary in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)Nos.3313 to 3315 of 2018

the light of the petitioner's representation dated 06.12.2017 as the case may be within time frame by this Court.

In W.P(MD)No.3315 of 2018:

                M.Durairaj                                              ... Petitioner
                                                      Vs.
                1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,

Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Fiannce (Pay Cell) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

2. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Fort. St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

3.The Commissioner of Rural Development, And Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai 600 01

4. The District Collector (PD Section), Sivagangai District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to revise the scales of pay of the petitioner as per G.O.Ms.No.71 (Finance) Pay Cell dated 26.02.2011, in accordance with directions given in Para 51(vi) of the judgment rendered by Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.504/2013 dated 27.02.2014 with all consequential benefits such as revised pension, arrears of pension and salary in the light of the petitioner's representation dated 06.12.2017 as the case may be within time frame by this Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)Nos.3313 to 3315 of 2018

For Petitioner : Mr.A.P.Muthupandian For Respondents : Mr.A.K.Manickam Special Government Pleader

COMMON ORDER

The petitioners are Block Development Officers in the Rural

Development Department in Pudukkottai District. They seek a mandamus

directing the State/R1 and R2, the Commissioner of Rural Development/R3 and

the District Collector (PD Section), Sivagangai District/R4 to revise their pay

scale in line with G.O.Ms.No.71 (Finance) Pay Cell dated 26.02.2011. In this

context, they also refer to the directions issued in W.A.No.504 of 2013 dated

27.02.2014.

2.A common counter has been filed by all the respondents and the

District Collector/R4 has filed a separate counter as well. Learned Special

Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, would submit that

G.O.Ms.No.417 Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 12.11.2020 would have a

bearing upon the decision to be taken upon the claim of the petitioners.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)Nos.3313 to 3315 of 2018

3. Without expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the

petitioner, and seeing as the petitioners have filed representations dated

27.10.2017 and 06.12.2017 before the respondents putting forth the identical

claim made by them in the present writ petitions the following direction would

suffice.

4. A direction is issued to the District Collector (PD Section), Sivagangai

District/R4 to dispose the aforesaid representations in consultation with the

Commissioner of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department/R3, after

hearing the petitioners in accordance with applicable Government Orders and

in accordance with law. I direct accordingly. The aforsaid exercise shall be

completed within a period of eight(8) weeks from today.

5. These Writ Petitions are disposed with the above direction. No costs.

16.11.2021 Index : Yes/ No Internet: Yes/No CM

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)Nos.3313 to 3315 of 2018

To,

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Fiannce (Pay Cell) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

2. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Fort. St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

3.The Commissioner of Rural Development, And Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai 600 01

4. The District Collector (PD Section), Sivagangai District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)Nos.3313 to 3315 of 2018

DR. ANITA SUMANTH , J.

CM

W.P.(MD) Nos.3313 to 3315 of 2018

16.11.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter