Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

I.I 92 vs The Additional Registrar Of
2021 Latest Caselaw 22347 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22347 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 November, 2021

Madras High Court
I.I 92 vs The Additional Registrar Of on 15 November, 2021
                                                                       WP No.33282 of 2016

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 15-11-2021

                                                      CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                             WP No.33282 of 2016
                                                    And
                                         WMP No.28753 and 28754 of 2016


                     I.I 92, Thirunavalur Farmers Service,
                          Cooperative Society,
                     Represented by its Secretary,
                     Thirunavalur Post,
                     Ulunderpet Taluk,
                     Villupuram District.                      ..    Petitioner

                                                         vs.


                     1.The Additional Registrar of
                         Cooperative Societies (ICDP),
                       No.170, N.V.N.Maligai,
                       Kilpauk,
                       Chennai – 10.

                     2.The Public Information Officer/
                       Personal Assistant (General) to
                       The District Collector,
                       Dharmapuri District.

                     3.T.Senthilkumar                          ..    Respondents


                     1/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  WP No.33282 of 2016

                                    Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records
                     of the first respondent in Rc.No.66860/2013/AR1, dated 06.09.2013,
                     Rc.No.66860/2013/AR1, dated 23.10.2013 and subsequent letter issued by
                     the second respondent in O.Mu.Si.Pa.732/2016 (Pa3) dated 24.08.2016
                     directing the petitioner to provide information required by the third
                     respondent quash them holding that the petitioner Cooperative Society
                     registered under the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act will not fall
                     within the definition of “public authority” as defined under Section 2(h) of
                     the RTI Act.


                                    For Petitioner                : Mr.M.S.Palaniswamy

                                    For Respondents-1 and 2       : Mr.C.Selvaraj,
                                                                    Additional Government Pleader.

                                    For Respondent-3              : Mr.P.Muthukumar


                                                          ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to quash the order of the

first respondent in Rc.No.66860/2013/AR1, dated 06.09.2013,

Rc.No.66860/2013/AR1, dated 23.10.2013 and subsequent letter issued by

the second respondent in O.Mu.Si.Pa.732/2016 (Pa3) dated 24.08.2016,

directing to issue copies required by the third respondent, holding that the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.33282 of 2016

petitioner-Co-operative Society registered under the Tamil Nadu Co-

operative Societies Act will not fall within the definition of "Public

Authority" as defined under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner is the elected President of the Society. By letter dated 24.08.2014,

the second respondent sought for certain information and documents

regarding appointment of Information Officers in Cooperative Societies.

And the third respondent also requested for certain copies of documents. It

is further submitted that the Final Authority rests with General Body of its

members and not with the Registrar of Co-operative Societies or State

Government. According to the petitioner, the Cooperative Society is not a

body, which is controlled by the Government and hence does not fall within

the definition of Section 2(h) of the Rights to Information Act. In view of

the above legal position, this writ petition is filed to set aside the letters of

the respondents seeking information and documents.

3. When the matter was taken up for final disposal, learned

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.33282 of 2016

counsel appearing for both the parties submitted that the relief prayed for, in

the present writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of Thalappalam Service Cooperative Bank

Ltd and Others vs. State of Kerala and Others [2013 (6) CTC 98 (SC)]

and the judgement of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Public

Information Officer vs. The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Information

Commission [2015 (4) CTC 105].

4. In paragraph 54 of the judgment in the case of Thalappalam

Services Cooperative Bank Ltd and Others Vs. State of Kerala and

Others [(2013) 7 MLJ 407 (SC)], the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held as

follows:

"We, therefore, hold that the Cooperative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-

operative Societies Act will not fall within the definition of public authority as defined under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act and the State Government letter dated 05.05.2006 and the circular dated 01.06.2006 issued by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Kerala, to the extent,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.33282 of 2016

made applicable to societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act would stand quashed in the absence of materials to show that they are owned, controlled or substantially financed by the appropriate Government. Appeals are, therefore, allowed as above, however, with no order as to costs."

In Paragraph 9 of the decision in The Public Information Officer Vs. The

Registrar, Tamilnadu Information Commission and Others etc. [2015

(4) CTC 105], the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court has held as

follows:

“9. In the light of the above, we have no hesitation to hold that the legal issue arising in these Appeals are squarely covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Thalappalam Ser. Coop. Bank Ltd. And others Vs. State of Kerala and others, 2013 (6) CTC 98 (SC). The distinction sought to be drawn by the learned counsel for the respondent stating that the provisions of the RTI Act would be applicable to cases where the Government Officers are appointed to function as Special Officers of the society, when there is no elected

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.33282 of 2016

Board of Directors, could hardly make any difference in the light of the recent pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants submitted that for all the societies, elections were conducted and the societies are managed by the elected members.”

5. In view of the aforesaid decisions, I have no hesitation to

quash the proceedings passed by the first respondent in Rc.No.

66860/2013/AR1, dated 06.09.2013, Rc.No.66860/2013/AR1, dated

23.10.2013 and subsequent letter issued by the second respondent in

O.Mu.Si.Pa.732/2016 (Pa3) dated 24.08.2016. Hence, the impugned order is

quashed and the writ petition is allowed. However, there shall be no order as

to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

15-11-2021 Index : Yes/No.

Internet : Yes/No.

Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order.

Svn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.33282 of 2016

To

1.The Additional Registrar of Cooperative Societies (ICDP), No.170, N.V.N.Maligai, Kilpauk, Chennai – 10.

2.The Public Information Officer/ Personal Assistant (General) to The District Collector, Dharmapuri District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.33282 of 2016

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Svn

WP 33282 of 2016

15-11-2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter