Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22152 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 November, 2021
W.P.No.6262 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
W.P.No.6262 of 2012
and W.M.P.No.2575 of 2020
R.Arun Kumar .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. State, represented by
Secretary (Home),
Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
2. Gowtham
3. Dhanraj
4. Vijayanand
5. Venkatesan
6. S.Ravikumar
7. Velusamy
8. Sub-Inspector of Police,
Cyber Crime Cell,
Central Crime Branch,
Egmore, Chennai - 600008.
9. The Inspector of Police,
CCB, Tiruppur. .. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to uphold the human rights of the
http://www.judis.nic.in
1/4
W.P.No.6262 of 2012
petitioner by calling for the records in FIR No.29 of 2011, dated 29.08.2011,
on the file of the Central Crime Branch, Tiruppur, the 9th respondent herein
and quashing the same and consequently order prosecution of the
respondents 1 to 7; award compensation of Rs.1 crore to the petitioner, direct
the 8th respondent to register a FIR on the complaint dated 22.09.2011 by
the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thangavel
For Respondents 1,8&9 : Mr.S.Arumugam
G.A.
For Respondent 6 : Mr.N.Manokaran
For Respondents 2, 4 & 5: M/s.Senthil Swamy Associates
For Respondent 3 : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar
-----
ORDER
(The case has been heard through video conference)
The writ petition has been filed for quashing the FIR No.29 of 2011,
dated 29.08.2011, on the file of the Central Crime Branch, Tiruppur and to
pay compensation of Rs.1 crore to the petitioner for initiating false criminal
proceedings against the petitioner.
2. Mr.G.Thangavel, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
would submit that admittedly now in the above said criminal case, final http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P.No.6262 of 2012
report has been filed, thereafter criminal trial was conducted in C.C.No.654
of 2017 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tiruppur and by
judgment dated 30.11.2018, the petitioner was acquitted by the trial Court.
The learned counsel would further contend that clearly a false case has been
initiated against the petitioner and it is a malicious prosecution and therefore
he is entitled for compensation.
3. If the petitioner considers it as a malicious prosecution, the remedy
to the petitioner lies elsewhere and not under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India. Hence, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty given to the
petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings, if he is so adviced.
Consequently the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
10.11.2021 kk
To
1. The Secretary to Government Home Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
2. Sub-Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Cell, Central Crime Branch, Egmore, Chennai - 600008.
3. The Inspector of Police, CCB, Tiruppur.
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P.No.6262 of 2012
V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.
kk
W.P.No.6262 of 2012 and W.M.P.No.2575 of 2020
10.11.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!