Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Management vs The General Secretary
2021 Latest Caselaw 22011 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22011 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2021

Madras High Court
The Management vs The General Secretary on 8 November, 2021
                                                           1

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 08.11.2021

                                                         Coram

                                 The Hon'ble Mr. Justice PARESH UPADHYAY
                                                      and
                          The Hon'ble Mr. Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

                                             W.A.No.2758 of 2021
                                                     and
                                            C.M.P.No.18108 of 2021

                      The Management,
                      Metropolitan Transport Corporation,
                      Chennai Division,
                      Pallavan Salai, Pallavan Illam,
                      Chennai – 2.                                             ..Appellant

                                                          Vs

                      The General Secretary,
                      State Transport Employees Union,
                      Regn. No.73 MDS (CITU),
                      No.2, Pallavan Salai,
                      Kalaiaranga Valagam,
                      Chennai – 2.                                            ..Respondent

                            Appeal preferred under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the
                      order dated 02.11.2020 made in W.P.No.33968 of 2019.

                                 For Appellant      ..     Mr.M.Chidambaram


                                                   JUDGMENT

(Delivered by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.)

Challenge in this appeal is made by the Management of the

Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Chennai Division to the order

http://www.judis.nic.in

passed by learned single Judge dated 02 November 2020 in

W.P. No.33968 of 2019. It is noted that the order dated 02.11.2020 is

common qua W.P. Nos.33967, 33968 and 33971 of 2019 and this writ

appeal is qua the order insofar as it pertains to W.P. No.33968 of

2019.

2. Learned advocate for the appellant/ management has

submitted that refusal by this Court to entertain the writ petition

challenging the award of the labour Court would lead to difficulties for

the management to maintain discipline. It is submitted that the labour

Court reduced the punishment from 'postponement of annual

increment with cumulative effect for six months' to 'postponement of

annual increment with cumulative effect for three months', which is

great injustice to the management, which learned single Judge ought

to have taken care of. It is submitted that this appeal be entertained.

3. Having heard the learned advocate for the appellant and

having considered the material on record this Court finds as under:

3.1. The concerned workman, whose case was represented by

the Union is a Tradesman. Management had imposed punishment of

http://www.judis.nic.in

postponement of annual increment with cumulative effect for six

months. This led to an industrial dispute which was registered as

I.D.No.255 of 2017. The same was adjudicated by the Principal Labour

Court at Chennai vide order dated 09.07.2019. After hearing the

parties and considering the totality, the labour Court passed an award

as under:

“In the result, the order passed by the respondent dated 08.10.2012 awarding the punishment of postponement of annual increment for six months with cumulative effect to the Tradesman Mr.B.Arivazhagan is set aside and modified as follows:

(1)The punishment of 6 months of stoppage of increment is reduced and fixed to 3 months with cumulative effect.

(2)The respondent Corporation is directed to remit back the amount already withheld by it on implementation of the impugned order with cumulative effect for three months to the Tradesman Mr.B.Arivazhagan within 30 days from the date of publication of award failing which the respondent would be liable to pay interest @ 12% per annum on the above amount.”

http://www.judis.nic.in

3.2. The above was challenged by the management in

W.P.No.33968 of 2019. Learned single Judge has declined to interfere

in the award of the Labour Court.

3.3. We have gone through the reasons recorded by learned

single Judge. On overall consideration of the matter, in the view of

learned single Judge, the exercise of powers by the labour Court to the

extent of modifying the award of the labour court from postponement

of annual increment for a period of six months to postponement

thereof for a period of three months is not such, which warranted any

interference. We find that, refusal to interfere in the award of the

labour Court in this case, can not be said to be any error, which may

call for any interference in an intra-court appeal.

4. For the above reasons, this writ appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

(P.U.J.,) (S.S.K.J.,) 08.11.2021 Index:Yes/No mmi/3

http://www.judis.nic.in

PARESH UPADHYAY, J.

and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.

mmi

W.A.No.2758 of 2021

08.11.2021

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter