Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21977 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2021
1 A.S.(MD)No.210 OF 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
A.S.(MD)No.210 of 2011 and
M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011
1. Rengaraj
2. Chandra ... Appellants / Plaintiffs
Vs.
1. Raja
2. Chinnaraj
3. Perammal
4. Thangapandiyan
5. Rathinavel
6. Thangavelammal
7. Sakthivelammal
8. Aandammal
9. Kumarammal ... Respondents / Defendants 1 to 9
Prayer: Appeal suit filed under Section 96 of C.P.C.,
to set aside the decree and judgment dated 19.07.2011 passed
in O.S.No.77 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District
Judge cum Fast Track Court, Dindigul and allow the above
appeal.
For Appellants : Mr.A.Robinson
For R-3 to R-7 : Mr.Arul,
for Mr.R.Nandakumar.
For R-1,R-2 &
R-8 & R-9 : No appearance.
***
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
1/4
2 A.S.(MD)No.210 OF 2011
JUDGMENT
The plaintiffs in O.S.No.77 of 2010 on the file of the
Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Dindigul, are the
appellants in this appeal.
2. The suit was for declaration that the earlier decree
made in O.S.No.157 of 1975 is null and void and other
consequential reliefs. The suit was dismissed by the impugned
judgment and decree dated 19.07.2011. Challenging the same,
this appeal suit came to be filed.
3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, I
suggested to the learned counsel on either side to prevail
upon the parties to arrive at an amicable settlement. The
parties also appeared before me on more than one occasion.
4. I am happy to record that after marathon
negotiations between the parties, the matter has been
amicably settled. A memo of compromise has been filed. It has been
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
signed by all the parties as well as the respective counsel.
Therefore, the impugned judgment and decree are set aside
and this appeal suit is disposed of in terms of the memo of
compromise dated 02.11.2021. The memo of compromise
along with sketches shall form part of the decree.
5. By consent of both the parties, Mr.A.Mohammed
Haneef, No.103, Lawyers Chamber, Madurai Bench of Madras
High Court, Madurai, Cell No.9842494977, is appointed as
Advocate Commissioner to ensure that the properties are duly
identified and also partitioned as per the memo of compromise
and delivery is also effected. No costs. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
02.11.2021
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes/ No
PMU
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.
PMU
To:
1. The Additional District Judge cum Fast Track Court, Dindigul.
2. The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
A.S.(MD)No.210 of 2011
02.11.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!