Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.Elavarasan vs The Registrar
2021 Latest Caselaw 21941 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21941 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2021

Madras High Court
P.Elavarasan vs The Registrar on 2 November, 2021
                                                      1

                            BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             DATED: 02.11.2021

                                                    CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
                                              AND
                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

                                       W.P(MD)NO.19923 OF 2021
                                                 and
                                       W.M.P(MD)No.16618 of 2021

                     P.Elavarasan                                   :Petitioner

                                             .vs.

                     1.The Registrar,
                       Debts Recovery Tribunal,
                       Chennai.

                     2.The Presiding Officer,
                       Debts Recovery Tribunal,
                       Coimbatore.

                     3.The Authorized Officer,
                       Canara Bank,
                       Karur SME Branch,
                       37, Ist Cross,
                       Vaiyapuri Nagar,
                       Karur – 639 001.                                  : Respondents

                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
                     of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified
                     Mandamus       calling for the records pertaining to the impugned
                     order passed by the first respondent, dated 15.09.2021 in I.A.No.36
                     of 2020 in AIR(SA)No.396 of 2019 and to quash the same and
                     consequently to direct the first respondent to take the appeal in
                     AIR(SA)No.396 of 2019 on file and decide the same on merits and
                     in accordance withlaw, within a time frame.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                2

                                      For Petitioner                :Mr.Iyappan

                                      For Respondents               :Mr.N.Dilipkumar

                                                     ORDER

************* [Order of the Court was made by M.DURAISWAMY.,J.]

The Petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Debts

Recovery Appellate Tribunal, dated 15.09.2021 in I.A.No.36 of

2020 in AIR(SA)No.396 of 2019.

2.Challenging the sale notice issued by the respondent/Bank,

the Petitioner preferred a SARFAESI appeal in S.A.No.565 of 2019,

on the file of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore along with

a petition for interim stay. The Debts Recovery Tribunal,

Coimbatore declined to grant interim stay in I.A.No.2952 of 2019.

Challenging the order, dated 20.11.2019 passed by the Debts

Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore in the stay petition, the Petitioner

has preferred an appeal before the Debts Recovery Appellate

Tribunal in AIR(SA)No.396 of 2019 along with an application in

I.A.No.36 of 2020, for waiver of pre-deposit amount.

3.The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal by order, dated

15.09.2021, directed the Petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.20 Lakhs in

two installments of Rs.10 Lakhs each. Challening this order, the

present Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

4.The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submitted

that the Division Bench of this Court in the judgment in the case

of Sree Jeya Soundharam Textile Mills Private Limited and

others .vs. Canara Bank, represented by its Manager,

Tirupur and others reported in 2019 3 CTC 497, held that the

appellant who has filed an appeal before the Debts Recovery

Appellate Tribunal as against the interlocutory order passed by

the Debts Recovery Tribunal, is not liable to make the pre-deposit

if the liability is not determined by the Debts Recovery Tribunal in

the interlocutory order.

5.Relying upon the said judgment, the learned counsel

submitted that the order passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate

Tribunal is to be set aside.

6.Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the

respondent/Bank submitted that after the disposal of the stay

petition in I.A.No.2952 of 2019 in S.A.No.565 of 2019 by the Debts

Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore, the respondent/Bank had

conducted the auction and the property was sold in public

auction on 20.11.2019 and the sale was also confirmed on 4.3.2020

and the Sale Certificate was registered on 20.10.2021. The learned

counsel appearing for the respondent Bank has also given a copy

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

of the communication received from the respondent Bank to the

learned counsel for the Petitioner.

7.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel

appearing on either side, following the ratio laid down by the

Division Bench of this Court in the judgment reported in 2019 3

CTC 497 cited supra, the order passed by the DRAT is liable to be

set aside and accordingly the same is set adide. The Petitioner is

entitled to get refund of a sum of Rs.10 Lakhs deposited by him to

the credit of Registrar, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal,

Chennai. Since the SARFAESI Appeal is pending before the Debts

Recovery Appellate Tribunal, it is open to the Petitioner to

prosecute the SARFAESI Appeal before the Debts Recovery

Tribunal, Coimbatore in accordance with law.

8.With these observations, the Writ Petition stands disposed

of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petiiton is

closed.

                                                             (M.D.,J.]      [K.M.S.,J.]
                                                                     02.11.2021
                     Index:Yes/No

                     Internet:Yes/No

                     vsn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To

1.The Registrar, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Chennai.

2.The Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore.

3.The Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, Karur SME Branch, 37, Ist Cross, Vaiyapuri Nagar, Karur – 639 001.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

M.DURAISWAMY, J.

AND K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.

vsn

0RDER MADE IN W.P(MD)NO.19923 OF 2021 and W.M.P(MD)No.16618 of 2021

02.11.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter