Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21887 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 November, 2021
W.P.No.26438 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
W.P. No.26438 of 2017
and W.M.P.No.28135 of 2017
Paul Chinnappan ... Petitioner
-Vs-
1. The District Collector,
Cuddalore District,
Cuddalore.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Vridhachalam,
Cuddalore District,
Cuddalore.
3. The Tahsildar,
Vridhachalam,
Cuddalore District.
4. The Revenue Inspector,
Vridhachalam,
Cuddalore District.
5. Arulprakasam
6. Calistamary ... Respondents
Prayer :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second
respondent to dispose of the appeal dated 20.04.2017 considering the decree
and judgment in O.S.No.66 of 2009, District Munsif Court, Neyveli and
A.S.No.10 of 2012 Sub Court, Neyveli, within a fixed time frame.
Page 1 of 4
W.P.No.26438 of 2017
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondents
For R1 to R4 : Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan
Government Advocate
For R5 to R6 : Mr.V.Raghavachari
ORDER
The Writ Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to
dispose of the appeal dated 20.04.2017 by considering the decree and
judgment made in O.S.No.66 of 2009 on the file of the District Munsif Court,
Neyveli and in A.S.No.10 of 2012 on the file of the Sub Court, Neyveli, within
a fixed time frame.
2. Heard Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan, learned Government Advocate
appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 and Mr.V.Raghavachari, learned Counsel
appearing for the respondents 5 & 6. No one is appeared on behalf of the
petitioner.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 5 & 6 would
submit that the sole petitioner died and the legal heirs did not take any steps to
implead themselves as party to the present petition.
4. It is seen from the records that on 21.04.2021, the learned counsel
W.P.No.26438 of 2017
appearing for the petitioner made representation that the sole petitioner is no
more and sought time to implead the legal heirs. However, even till today he
did not take any steps to implead the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner.
5. Considering the limited prayer sought for in the present Writ
Petition, the second respondent is directed to consider the appeal dated
20.04.2017, after issuance of notice to the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner
and the respondents 5 & 6, and after giving opportunity of hearing to both the
parties and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period
of twelve weeks from the date of the receipt of a copy of this Order, if not
already disposed of.
6. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
01.11.2021
Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order rts
W.P.No.26438 of 2017
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
rts
To
1. The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vridhachalam, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.
3. The Tahsildar, Vridhachalam, Cuddalore District.
4. The Revenue Inspector, Vridhachalam, Cuddalore District.
W.P. No.26438 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.28135 of 2017
01.11.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!