Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11295 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 May, 2021
Crl.MP No.5666 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 05.05.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Crl.MP No.5666 of 2021 in
Crl.A.No.232 of 2021
1. Manikandan
2. Sathyavathy ... Petitioners
Vs.
State by
The Inspector of Police,
H-3, Tondaiyarpet Police Station,
Chennai.
(CR.No.1217/2016) ... Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 389 (1) of
Criminal Procedure Code, to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioners
in S.C.No.359 of 2017 dated 24.02.2021, by the learned Sessions Judge,
Mahila Court, Chennai and to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal
of the Criminal Appeal.
For Petitioners : Ms.A.Madhumathi for
Mr.C.P.Palanichamy
For Respondent : Mrs.Saradha,
Government Advocate
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Crl.MP No.5666 of 2021
ORDER
(The case has been heard through video conference) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned
Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.
2. The petitioners faced trial in S.C.No.359 of 2017 on the file of the
learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Chennai by the impugned Order and
Judgment dated 24.02.2021. They were found guilty under Sections 498 A
and 306 of IPC and they have been sentenced to 3 years and 10 years
imprisonment respectively.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would state that the
marriage between the 1st accused and the deceased was solemnized on
21.08.2016. The deceased was brought up in Mumbai. After Marriage, she
was moved to a joint family at Tondiarpet and she got early pregnancy and
according to prosecution, due to mental cruelty and continuous harassment, on
19.11.2016, the deceased committed suicide.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.MP No.5666 of 2021
4. The contention of the appellants' counsel is that the deceased
appears to undergone Culture shock and that appears to be the reason for
committing suicide. She draws my attention to the inquest report, in which
the RDO had recorded his conclusion that there was no dowry demand. The
appellants' counsel would state that this aspect was not given sufficient
attention by the Court below. Since, the appellants have arguable points in the
appeal, sentence is suspended. It is further pointed out by the appellants that
the appellants are in custody since the date of the Judgment. Bail is granted
subject to the following condition:
i. The Appellants/Accused shall execute a bond for a sum of
Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a
like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court,
Chennai.
ii. The appellants / accused shall report before the trial Court on the
first working day of every English calender month at 10.30 am until further
orders
05.05.2021 (2/2) vum/kas
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.MP No.5666 of 2021
vum/kas To
1. The Inspector of Police, H-3, Tondaiyarpet Police Station, Chennai.
2. The Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Chennai.
3. The Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai
2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.
Crl.MP No.5666 of 2021 in Crl.A.No.232 of 2021
05.05.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!