Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Incense Creators vs M/S. Sairam Agarbathi Co
2021 Latest Caselaw 6248 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6248 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2021

Madras High Court
M/S. Incense Creators vs M/S. Sairam Agarbathi Co on 9 March, 2021
                                                          1

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                       Dated : 09.03.2021

                                                      CORAM :

                            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

                                                 C.S.No. 524 of 2005
                    M/s. Incense Creators,
                    No.136, (Old No.111), First Floor,
                    Coral Merchant Street,
                    Mannady, Chennai - 600 001.                                 ... Plaintiff

                                                         Vs.

                    M/s. Sairam Agarbathi Co.
                    No.163, 9th Main, Dr. Raj Road,
                    2nd Cross, Srinivasanagar,
                    Bangalore - 560 050.                                      ... Defendant

                    Prayer:
                              Civil Suit is filed under Or.VII Rule 1 of CPC and under Order IV

                    Rule 1 of O.S.Rules and Sections 134 and 135 of the Trade Marks Act,

                    1999, (a) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants by

                    themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them from

                    in any manner infringing the plaintiff's well established trade mark "A B C

                    D" by using the offending trade mark "A B C D" or any other mark or

                    marks which are in any way deceptively similar to or a colourable

                    imitation of the plaintiff's well established trade mark "A B C D" either by

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                              2

                    manufacturing or selling or offering for sale or in any manner advertising

                    the same.

                              (b) Granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants by

                    themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them from

                    in any manner passing off of their "agarbathies" bearing the offending

                    trade mark "A B C D" as and for the plaintiff's celebrated "Agarbathies"

                    bearing the well established trade mark either by manufacturing, selling or

                    offering for sale or in any manner advertising the same

                              (c) directing the defendants to surrender to the plaintiff the entire

                    stock of unused offending labels bearing the offending trade mark "A B C

                    D" along with the blocks and dyes for destruction;

                              (d) directing the defendants to render a true and faithful account of

                    the profits earned by the defendant through the sale of the agarbathies

                    bearing the offending trade mark "A B C D" and directing payment of

                    such profits to the plaintiff for the passing off committed by the defendant;

                              (e) for cost of the suit.



                                     For Plaintiff        : Mr.R.Govindarajan

                                                             -----

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                            3

                                                    JUDGMENT

The suit had been filed under Sections 134 and 135 of the Trade

Marks Act, 1999, seeking protection of the trade mark of the plaintiff

"A B C D" and for consequential reliefs.

2. Since it is an assertion of intellectual property right, the

Commerical Division of this Court will have jurisdiction to determine the

issues raised under Section 2(1)(c) (xvii) of the Commercial Courts Act,

2015.

3. There had been no progress in the suit from the year 2005. It

was previously listed on 25.02.2021. The plaintiff was directed to file an

affidavit indicating whether the cause of action still survives in the suit. It

had also been noted that even if the affidavit is not filed, further orders

would be passed.

4. In view of the same, nothing survives for further

consideration in the present suit. Accordingly, the Civil Suit is dismissed

for non prosecution. No order as to costs.

09.03.2021 msm

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

msm

Index : Yes Internet : Yes Speaking order : Yes/No

C.S.No. 524 of 2005

09.03.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter