Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6248 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 09.03.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
C.S.No. 524 of 2005
M/s. Incense Creators,
No.136, (Old No.111), First Floor,
Coral Merchant Street,
Mannady, Chennai - 600 001. ... Plaintiff
Vs.
M/s. Sairam Agarbathi Co.
No.163, 9th Main, Dr. Raj Road,
2nd Cross, Srinivasanagar,
Bangalore - 560 050. ... Defendant
Prayer:
Civil Suit is filed under Or.VII Rule 1 of CPC and under Order IV
Rule 1 of O.S.Rules and Sections 134 and 135 of the Trade Marks Act,
1999, (a) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants by
themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them from
in any manner infringing the plaintiff's well established trade mark "A B C
D" by using the offending trade mark "A B C D" or any other mark or
marks which are in any way deceptively similar to or a colourable
imitation of the plaintiff's well established trade mark "A B C D" either by
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
2
manufacturing or selling or offering for sale or in any manner advertising
the same.
(b) Granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants by
themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them from
in any manner passing off of their "agarbathies" bearing the offending
trade mark "A B C D" as and for the plaintiff's celebrated "Agarbathies"
bearing the well established trade mark either by manufacturing, selling or
offering for sale or in any manner advertising the same
(c) directing the defendants to surrender to the plaintiff the entire
stock of unused offending labels bearing the offending trade mark "A B C
D" along with the blocks and dyes for destruction;
(d) directing the defendants to render a true and faithful account of
the profits earned by the defendant through the sale of the agarbathies
bearing the offending trade mark "A B C D" and directing payment of
such profits to the plaintiff for the passing off committed by the defendant;
(e) for cost of the suit.
For Plaintiff : Mr.R.Govindarajan
-----
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
3
JUDGMENT
The suit had been filed under Sections 134 and 135 of the Trade
Marks Act, 1999, seeking protection of the trade mark of the plaintiff
"A B C D" and for consequential reliefs.
2. Since it is an assertion of intellectual property right, the
Commerical Division of this Court will have jurisdiction to determine the
issues raised under Section 2(1)(c) (xvii) of the Commercial Courts Act,
2015.
3. There had been no progress in the suit from the year 2005. It
was previously listed on 25.02.2021. The plaintiff was directed to file an
affidavit indicating whether the cause of action still survives in the suit. It
had also been noted that even if the affidavit is not filed, further orders
would be passed.
4. In view of the same, nothing survives for further
consideration in the present suit. Accordingly, the Civil Suit is dismissed
for non prosecution. No order as to costs.
09.03.2021 msm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
msm
Index : Yes Internet : Yes Speaking order : Yes/No
C.S.No. 524 of 2005
09.03.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!