Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5386 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2021
W.A.(MD)No.464 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 01.03.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.ANANTHI
W.A.(MD)No.464 of 2021 and
CMP(MD) No.1959 of 2021
Padmini :Appellant
Vs.
1.The District Collector,
Thanjavur District,
Thanjavur.
2.The Planning Officer,
Office of the District Collector,
Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.
3.The Tahsildar,
Orathanadu Taluk
Thanjavur District.
4.The Assistant Executive Engineer,
Public Works department (Buildings)
Pattukottai, Thanjavur District.
5.The Block Development Officer,
Office of the BDO
Thiruvonam
Thanjavur District.
1/5
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.A.(MD)No.464 of 2021
6.K.Bhaskar : Respondents
PRAYER: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the
order of this Court in W.P.(MD) No.7433/2020 dated 25.01.2021.
For Appellant : Mr.G.Thiruvarutselvan
For Respondents : Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss for R1 to R5
Special Government Pleader
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)
The appellant is the petitioner before the learned single Judge. He
filed a writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from putting up a
bus shelter on the ground that the area is earmarked as a water body.
2. The learned Judge, after holding that the construction was in a
water body, permitted the construction to go on, since substantial work
has already been done and no more construction would be made over the
same. The learned Judge also recorded the fact that access to the
petitioner's Tea Stall would not be affected.
http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.(MD)No.464 of 2021
3. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the land in
question being a water body, the order of the learned single Judge
requires to be interfered with.
4. We do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the
learned Single Judge. Admittedly, substantial work has already been
completed. It is not as if the entire area is converted into a bus shelter.
The access to the petitioner's Tea stall is also assured. The petitioner's
real interest is not to protect the water body, but to safeguard the access.
His interest is only to run the Tea Stall. The construction is only for a
bus shelter. Thus, looking from any perspective, we do not find any
merit in this writ appeal. Accordingly, the writ appeal stands dismissed.
No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
[M.M.S., J.] & [S.A.I, J.] 01.03.2021 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes RR
http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.(MD)No.464 of 2021
To
1.The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.
2.The Planning Officer, Office of the District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.
3.The Tahsildar, Orathanadu Taluk Thanjavur District.
4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works department (Buildings) Pattukottai, Thanjavur District.
5.The Block Development Officer, Office of the BDO Thiruvonam Thanjavur District.
http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.(MD)No.464 of 2021
M.M.SUNDRESH, J AND S.ANANTHI, J
RR
Order made in W.A.(MD)No.464 of 2021
01.03.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!