Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manickammal vs Indirani
2021 Latest Caselaw 5263 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5263 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2021

Madras High Court
Manickammal vs Indirani on 1 March, 2021
                                                                     C.M.A. Nos.503 & 505 of 2021

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 01.03.2021

                                                       CORAM:

                              THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

                                            C.M.A.Nos.503 & 505 of 2021

                    1.Manickammal
                    2.Minor Srithika
                    3.Minor Agalya
                    (Minors rep. By their mother, 1st appellant)
                    4.Surumbayee
                    5.Parimanam                                                .. Appellants in
                                                                           C.M.A.No.503/2021

                    1.Annammal
                    2.Ganesan                                                  .. Appellants in
                                                                           C.M.A.No.505/2021

                                                           Vs.

                    1.Indirani

                    2.The Manager,
                      United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,
                      5476-79, Sundaram Masila Maligai,
                      Old Thirumayam Salai, Pudukottai,
                      Pudukottai District 622 001.                               .. Respondents

in both the appeals

_____

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A. Nos.503 & 505 of 2021

Common Prayer: These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the common judgment and decree dated 05.02.2019, made in M.C.O.P. Nos.1488 & 1388 of 2016, on the file of the Additional District Court, (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Namakkal.

                                        For Appellants     : Mr.A.Sathishkumar
                                                             for M/s.C.Thangaraju

                                        For Respondents     : M/s.I.Malar (For R2)

                                              COMMON         JUDGMENT

                          These    Civil      Miscellaneous Appeals   have   been    filed   seeking

enhancement of the compensation granted by the Tribunal in the common

award dated 05.02.2019, made in M.C.O.P. Nos.1488 & 1388 of 2016, on the

file of the Additional District Court, (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal),

Namakkal.

2.By consent of the learned counsel appearing for the appellants as well

as the 2nd respondent, both the appeals are taken up for final disposal at the

admission stage itself.

_____

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A. Nos.503 & 505 of 2021

3.The appellants in both the appeals filed M.C.O.P. Nos.1488 & 1388

of 2016, on the file of the Additional District Court, (Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal), Namakkal, claiming a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- each as compensation

for the death of Dharmaraj and Karthik respectively, who died in the accident

that took place on 04.07.2016.

4.The Tribunal considering the pleadings, oral and documentary

evidence, held that the accident occurred only due to rash and negligent

driving by driver of the Car belonging to the 1st respondent and directed the

2nd respondent as insurer of the vehicle to pay a sum of Rs.13,80,400/- and

Rs.9,58,200/- as compensation to the appellants in both the appeals

respectively.

5.Not being satisfied with the amounts granted by the Tribunal in the

award dated 05.02.2019, made in M.C.O.P. Nos.1488 & 1388 of 2016, the

appellants have come out with the present appeals.

_____

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A. Nos.503 & 505 of 2021

6.The learned counsel appearing for the appellants in C.M.A.No.503 of

2021 contended that at the time of accident, the deceased was aged 35 years

and was doing business jointly with one Karthick at Namakkal Salem road,

by putting up a shop under the name and style of Periyasamy Battery and

Electricals and was earning a sum of Rs.20,000/- per month. To substantiate

the same, they have examined one Murugan co-worker of the deceased as

P.W.4. The Tribunal fixed a meagre sum of Rs.6,500/- per month and granted

40% enhancement towards future prospectus and awarded compensation

towards loss of dependency. The Tribunal failed to grant any compensation

towards transportation, loss of love and affection to the appellants 2 and 3

who are the minor children and appellants 4 and 5 who are the aged parents

of the deceased and prayed for enhancement of the compensation.

7.The learned counsel appearing for the appellants in C.M.A.No.505 of

2021 contended that at the time of accident, the deceased was aged 29 years,

Bachelor and was doing business jointly with one Dharmaraj at Namakkal

Salem road, by putting up a shop under the name and style of Periyasamy

_____

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A. Nos.503 & 505 of 2021

Battery and Electricals and was earning a sum of Rs.20,000/- per month. To

substantiate the same, they have examined one Murugan co-worker of the

deceased as P.W.4. The Tribunal fixed a meagre sum of Rs.6,500/- per month

and granted 40% enhancement towards future prospectus and awarded

compensation towards loss of dependency. The Tribunal failed to grant any

compensation towards transportation, loss of love and affection to the

appellants who are the aged parents of the deceased and prayed for

enhancement of the compensation.

8.Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent-

Insurance Company contended that the respondents failed to prove the

avocation and income of the deceased persons. In the absence of any proof,

the Tribunal has fixed excessive amount as notional income and granted

compensation towards loss of dependency in both the appeals. The total

compensation granted by the Tribunal in both the appeals are not meagre. The

appellants have not made out any case for enhancement of the compensation

and prayed for dismissal of the appeals.

_____

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A. Nos.503 & 505 of 2021

9.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants as well as the

2nd respondent-Insurance Company who appeared through video conference

and perused the materials available on record.

C.M.A.No.503 of 2021:

10.It is the case of the appellants that at the time of accident, the

deceased was jointly running a shop with one Karthick in the name and style

of Periyasamy Battery and Electricals and was earning a sum of Rs.20,000/-

per month. Except examining P.W.4, the appellants have not filed any

document to prove the income and avocation of the deceased. In the absence

of any evidence, the Tribunal fixed a sum of Rs.6,500/- per month as notional

income of the deceased. The accident is of the year 2016. The monthly income

fixed by the Tribunal is meagre. Considering the year of accident and nature

of work done by the deceased, a sum of Rs.12,000/- per month is fixed as

notional income of the deceased. Taking into consideration the post mortem

_____

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A. Nos.503 & 505 of 2021

certificate, the Tribunal fixed the age of the deceased as 35 years and applied

multiplier '16'. Following the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court, the

Tribunal has rightly granted 40% enhancement towards future prospects and

deducted 1/4th towards personal expenses of the deceased. Thus, by fixing

Rs.12,000/- per month as notional income of the deceased, the amounts

awarded by the Tribunal towards loss of dependency is modified to

Rs.24,19,200/- {[Rs.12,000/- + Rs.4,800/- (40% of Rs.12,000/-)] x 12 x 16 x

3/4}. The Tribunal has not awarded any amount towards loss of love and

affection to the appellants 2 to 5. The appellants 2 and 3 who are the minor

children of the deceased and the appellants 4 and 5 who are the parents of the

deceased are entitled to a sum of Rs.40,000/- towards loss of love and

affection. The Tribunal failed to grant any amount for transportation. The

appellants are entitled to a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards transportation. The

amounts granted by the Tribunal under other conventional heads are just and

reasonable and hence, the same are confirmed. Thus, the compensation awarded

by the Tribunal is modified as follows:




                    _____




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                                    C.M.A. Nos.503 & 505 of 2021

                          S. No    Description               Amount awarded           Amount           Award
                                                              by Tribunal           awarded by      confirmed or
                                                                  (Rs)            this Court (Rs)   enhanced or
                                                                                                      granted
                          1.       Loss of dependency              13,10,400/-        24,19,200/-    Enhanced
                          2.       Funeral expenses                  15,000/-            15,000/-    Confirmed
                          3.       Loss of consortium to             40,000/-            40,000/-    Confirmed
                                   1st appellant
                          4.       Loss of love and                           -          40,000/-     Granted
                                   affection to appellants
                                   2 to 5
                          5.       Loss of estate                    15,000/-            15,000/-    Confirmed
                          6.       Transportation                             -          10,000/-     Granted
                                   Total                           13,80,400/-        25,39,200/- Enhanced by
                                                                                                  Rs.11,58,800/-




                    C.M.A.No.505 of 2021:

11.It is the case of the appellants that at the time of accident, the

deceased was jointly running a shop with one Karthick in the name and style,

Periyasamy Battery and Electricals and was earning a sum of Rs.20,000/- per

month. Except examining P.W.4, the appellants have not filed any document

to prove the income and avocation of the deceased. In the absence of any

evidence, the Tribunal fixed a sum of Rs.6,500/- per month as notional income

of the deceased. The accident is of the year 2016. The monthly income fixed

_____

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A. Nos.503 & 505 of 2021

by the Tribunal is meagre. Considering the year of accident and nature of

work done by the deceased, a sum of Rs.12,000/- per month is fixed as

notional income of the deceased. Taking into consideration the post mortem

certificate, the Tribunal fixed the age of the deceased as 29 years and applied

multiplier '17'. Following the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court, the

Tribunal has rightly granted 40% enhancement towards future prospects and

deducted 1/2 towards personal expenses of the deceased. Thus, by fixing

Rs.12,000/- per month as notional income of the deceased, the amounts

awarded by the Tribunal towards loss of dependency is modified to

Rs.17,13,600/- {[Rs.12,000/- + Rs.4,800/- (40% of Rs.12,000/-)] x 12 x 17 x

1/2}. The Tribunal has not awarded any amount towards loss of love and

affection to the appellants who are the parents of the deceased. The appellants

are entitled to a sum of Rs.40,000/- towards loss of love and affection. The

Tribunal failed to grant any amount for transportation. The appellants are

entitled to a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards transportation. The amounts granted

by the Tribunal under other conventional heads are just and reasonable and hence,

the same are confirmed. Thus, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is

_____

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A. Nos.503 & 505 of 2021

modified as follows:

S. No Description Amount awarded Amount Award by Tribunal awarded by confirmed or (Rs) this Court (Rs) enhanced or granted

1. Loss of dependency 9,28,200/- 17,13,600/- Enhanced

2. Funeral expenses 15,000/- 15,000/- Confirmed

3. Loss of love and - 40,000/- Granted affection

4. Loss of estate 15,000/- 15,000/- Confirmed

5. Transportation - 10,000/- Granted Total 9,58,200/- 17,93,600/- Enhanced by Rs.8,35,400/-

12.In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed and the sum of

Rs.13,80,400/- awarded by the Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.1488 of 2016 is

enhanced to Rs.25,39,200/- together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per

annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit and the sum of

Rs.9,58,200/- awarded by the Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.1388 of 2016 is

enhanced to Rs.17,93,600/- together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per

annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit. The 2nd respondent-

Insurance Company is directed to deposit the award amounts, now

_____

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A. Nos.503 & 505 of 2021

determined by this Court in both the appeals, along with interest and costs,

within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment, to the credit of M.C.O.P. Nos.1488 and 1388 of 2016 respectively.

(i) On such deposit in M.C.O.P.No.1488 of 2016, the appellants 1, 4

and 5 are permitted to withdraw their share of the award amount, now

determined by this Court, along with proportionate interest and costs, as per

the ratio of apportionment fixed by the Tribunal, after adjusting the amount, if

any, already withdrawn, by filing necessary applications before the Tribunal.

The shares of the minor appellants 2 and 3 are directed to be deposited in any

one of the Nationalized Bank, till the minors attain majority. The 1 st appellant,

mother of the minor appellants 2 and 3 is permitted to withdraw the accrued

interest, once in three months for the welfare of the minor appellants 2 and 3.

(ii) On such deposit in M.C.O.P.No.1388 of 2016, the appellants are

permitted to withdraw their share of the award amount, now determined by

this Court, along with proportionate interest and costs, as per the ratio of

_____

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A. Nos.503 & 505 of 2021

apportionment fixed by the Tribunal, after adjusting the amount, if any,

already withdrawn, by filing necessary applications before the Tribunal. No

costs.

01.03.2021 Index : Yes / No gsa

To

1.The Additional District Judge, (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Namakkal.

2.The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court, Madras.

_____

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A. Nos.503 & 505 of 2021

V.M.VELUMANI, J.,

gsa

C.M.A.Nos.503 and 505 of 2021

01.03.2021

_____

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter