Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

B. Radha vs 3 The Superintendent Of Prisons
2021 Latest Caselaw 12479 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12479 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 June, 2021

Madras High Court
B. Radha vs 3 The Superintendent Of Prisons on 26 June, 2021
                                                                                    W.P.No.13786 of 2021




                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                            RESERVED ON:          07.09.2021
                                           DELIVERED ON:          15.09.2021

                                     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH
                                                           and
                                     THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE R.N. MANJULA
                                 W.P. No.13786 of 2021 and W.M.P. No.14635 of 2021
                 B. Radha                                                        Petitioner
                                                           vs.
                 1        The State of Tamil Nadu
                          represented by the Principal Secretary to Government
                          Home, Prohibition and Excise Department
                          Secretariat
                          Chennai 600 009

                 2        The Director General of Police & I.G. of Prisons
                          Gandhi Irwin Road
                          Egmore, Chennai 600 008

                 3        The Superintendent of Prisons
                          Central Prison
                          Puzhal, Chennai 600 066                                Respondents


                          Writ Petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                 seeking a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the
                 petitioner's representation dated 26.06.2021 and release the petitioner's husband




                 Page 1 of 8
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                                   W.P.No.13786 of 2021




                 Balasubramaniyan, S/o Duraisamy, aged 65 years, now confined in the Central
                 Prison-1, on medical grounds.


                                       For petitioner    Mr. P. Pugalenthi
                                       For respondents   Mr. Hasan Mohamed Jinnah
                                                         State Public Prosecutor
                                                         assisted by Mr. R. Muniyapparaj
                                                         Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
                                                         -----
                                                         ORDER

P.N. PRAKASH, J.

The petitioner's husband Balasubramaniyan, S/o Duraisamy, is a convict

prisoner (OJCT 1873), who was convicted and sentenced in Special C.C. No.1 of

2004 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate (Special Court for Vigilance and Anti-

Corruption Cases), Pudukkottai on 16.07.2008 as under:

                           Provisions under which                   Sentence
                                  convicted

Section 7 of the Vigilance 2 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of and Anti-Corruption Act Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 months Section 13(2) r/w S.13(1) 2 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of of the Prevention of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo rigorous Corruption Act imprisonment for 3 months The aforesaid sentences were ordered to run consecutively.

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.13786 of 2021

2 Challenging the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated

16.07.2008, Balasubramaniyan preferred Crl.A.(MD) No.364 of 2008 in this

Court and after its dismissal vide judgment dated 04.12.2018, he was admitted in

the Central Prison, Trichy, on 03.06.2019, for undergoing the sentences.

Thereafter, he was transferred from the Central Prison, Trichy, to the Central

Prison, Puzhal, Chennai on 22.06.2021 and he has been undergoing the sentences

there since then.

3 While that being so, alleging that her husband Balasubramaniyan is

dangerously ill and deserves to be released under Rule 632 of the Tamil Nadu

Prison Rules, 1983, the petitioner addressed a representation dated 26.06.2021 to

the respondents seeking his release on medical grounds and finding no response,

has preferred the instant writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the

first respondent to consider her representation dated 26.06.2021 and release her

husband Balasubramaniyan on medical grounds.

4 The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal, has filed a counter

affidavit dated 24.07.2021, wherein, it is stated that the convict prisoner

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.13786 of 2021

Balasubramaniyan was examined by the Regional Medical Board, Government

Stanley Hospital, Chennai-1 and the Board comprising three specialists have

submitted a report dated 23.08.2021, wherein, they have not stated that the convict

prisoner is dangerously ill and that his illness will be aggravated more by further

imprisonment as to result in his early death and that he will have a reasonable

chance of recovery if released as required under Rule 632, ibid.

5 At this juncture, it may be apposite to extract Rule 632, ibid.

"632. Release of sick prisoners.-- (1) If the Medical Officer considers (i) that any prisoner is dangerously ill and that his illness has not been purposely caused or aggravated by the prisoner himself: (ii) that his illness, whether caused by imprisonment or not, will be so aggravated by further imprisonment as to render his early death likely; and (iii) that the prisoner will have a reasonable chance of recovery, if released, he shall record a certificate in the following form, namely;--

"I. A.B. hereby certify that convict No.......... Name ..... is, in my opinion, dangerously ill, suffering from .... (name of disease). His illness has not been caused or aggravated by any acts committed by him in order to procure release, and I sincerely declare that, in my opinion ,he is likely to die if he remains in confinement, but that he will have a reasonable chance of recovery if he is released."

In order to be accepted by the Government, the certificate must strictly be in accordance with the terms of this rule. To it, the Medical Officer shall append a full statement of the medical case and of the reasons which lead him to the belief expressed in the certificate.

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.13786 of 2021

(2) The Superintendent shall at once consult the Collector of the district to which the prisoner belongs, about the desirability of releasing the prisoner and then forward the papers to the Inspector- General for submission to Government together with a nominal roll of the prisoner showing the amount of remission earned and any remarks relevant to the case, the Superintendent may desire to add. A certificate to the effect that the Superintendent has satisfied himself that the convict will, if released, be suitably cared for, shall accompany the other documents."

6 The report dated 23.08.2021 issued by the Regional Medical Board,

Government Stanley Hospital, Chennai, reads as under:

"Convict is not suffering from any life-threatening illness. Patient is bed-ridden. He needs assistance for his routine activity. Patient is not self-sufficient to take care of himself. Patient needs bladder care, bowel care, nutritional care and supportive care."

7 A reading of the above extracted portion from the report of the

Regional Medical Board, Government Stanley Hospital, Chennai, shows that the

convict prisoner is not suffering from any life-threatening illness, though he is bed-

ridden and requires assistance for his routine activities and supportive care which

are, at present, being given to him in the Prison Hospital.

8 As per Rule 632, ibid., for releasing a prisoner under the said Rule,

the Medical Officer should say that, in his opinion, the prisoner is likely to die if he

remains in confinement and that he will have a reasonable chance of recovery if he

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.13786 of 2021

is released. Unless this condition obtains, the prisoner cannot be released under

Rule 632, ibid.

9 Mr. Pugalenthi, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even

according to the report of the Regional Medical Board dated 23.08.2021, the

convict prisoner appears to be suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension,

coronary artery disease, etc. and therefore, he deserves to be released under Rule

632, ibid.

10 Mr. Hasan Mohamed Jinnah, learned State Public Prosecutor, assisted

by Mr. R. Muniyapparaj, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), refuted the

aforesaid contention.

11 We gave our anxious consideration to the rival submissions.

12 At the outset, we have to confess that we are not medical experts and

we have to go only by the report of the Regional Medical Board. As stated above,

the Regional Medical Board comprising three experts, has gone into all the medical

parameters of the convict prisoner and has clearly opined that though he has the

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.13786 of 2021

aforesaid ailments, yet, he does not suffer from any life-threatening illness.

Therefore, we cannot substitute our opinion over that of the experts.

13 In such perspective of the matter, this writ petition is liable to be

dismissed as being devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. Costs made

easy. Connected W.M.P. is closed. However, the prison authorities shall provide

medical treatment to the prisoner in the best possible way.

(P.N.P., J.) (R.N.M., J.) 15.09.2021 cad

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.13786 of 2021

P.N. PRAKASH, J.

and

R.N. MANJULA, J.

                                                                                                  cad
                 To

                 1        The Principal Secretary to Government
                          Home, Prohibition and Excise Department
                          Secretariat
                          Chennai 600 009

                 2        The Director General of Police & I.G. of Prisons
                          Gandhi Irwin Road
                          Egmore, Chennai 600 008

                 3        The Superintendent of Prisons
                          Central Prison
                          Puzhal, Chennai 600 066

                 4        The Public Prosecutor
                          High Court of Madras
                          Chennai 600 104

                                                                             W.P. No.13786 of 2021




                                                                                        15.09.2021





http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter