Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Narayanan vs The Chairman And Managing ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 11655 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11655 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 June, 2021

Madras High Court
K.Narayanan vs The Chairman And Managing ... on 15 June, 2021
                                                            W.P(MD)No.8499, 8501 & 8504 of 2021

                             BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED: 15.06.2021

                                                   CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

                                    W.P(MD)Nos.8499, 8501 & 8504 of 2021

                 K.Narayanan                        ... Petitioner in W.P(MD)No.8499/2021

                 K.Paulsamy                         ... Petitioner in W.P(MD)No.8501/2021

                 M.A.Michael Raj                    ... Petitioner in W.P(MD)No.8504/2021



                                                      vs.
                 1.The Chairman and Managing Director,
                   SIDCO, Thiru.V.Ka.Industrial Estate,
                   Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

                 2.The Branch Manager,
                   SIDCO, Madurai.                  ... Respondents in all W.Ps'

COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writs of Mandamus, directing the respondents to extend the benefit of encashment of unearned leave on private affairs for the period of 90 days to the petitioners and to pay monetary benefits to the petitioners with interest at the rate of 18% per annum payable from the date of retirement of the petitioners to till the date of payment of the said monetary benefits based on the scheme of unearned leave on private affairs in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.488, Finance (Pension) Department, dated

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.8499, 8501 & 8504 of 2021

12.08.1996 and Government letter No.37568/BPE/2006, dated 28.01.2008 within the time stipulated by this Court.

                                   For Petitioner       : Mr.K.Muthumalai
                                     (In all W.Ps')

                                   For Respondents : Mr.T.Sakthikumaran
                                     (In all W.Ps')

                                                      COMMON ORDER


                           The     petitioners   have    filed   these   Writ   Petitions    to   direct   the

respondents to extend the benefit of encashment of unearned leave on

private affairs for the period of 90 days to the petitioners and to pay

monetary benefits to the petitioners with interest in accordance with

G.O.Ms.No.488, Finance (Pension) Department, dated 12.08.1996 and

Government letter No.37568/BPE/2006, dated 28.01.2008.

2.According to the petitioners in W.P(MD)Nos.8499 & 8504 of 2020,

after rendering 30 years of service in the respondents-SIDCO Corporation,

they opted for voluntary retirement and allowed to retire from service on

31.04.2004 and 31.12.2003 respectively. Further, the petitioner in

W.P(MD)No.8501 of 2021, after rendering 35 years of service in the

respondents-Corporation, retired from service on attaining the age of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.8499, 8501 & 8504 of 2021

superannuation on 30.06.2006. At the time of their retirement, they were

paid with Gratuity, Encashment of Earned Leave and Exgratia payment. The

petitioners were not paid Encashment of unearned Leave on private affairs.

3.Further, according to the petitioners, by G.O.Ms.No.488, Finance

(Pension) Department, dated 12.08.1996, the Government employees, at

the time of retirement, were given the benefit of Encashment of 50% of the

leave on private affairs. Paragraph No.2(a) & (b) of the said Government

Order, reads as follows:-

“2.The Government have decided to accept the long pending demand of various associations of employees to surrender half pay leave on private affairs at the time of retirement and also to grant full leave salary on encashment of the entire earned leave at credit of retiring employees. Accordingly, Government pass the following orders:-

a.At the time of retirement, 50% of the leave on private affairs standing to the credit of the employees upto a maximum of 90 days, be entitled for full leave salary.

The head of office shall draw the leave salary on encashment of leave on private affairs, as in the case of encashment of earned leave; and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.8499, 8501 & 8504 of 2021

b.Full leave salary including dearness allowance and other allowances normally admissible while going on leave during service be allowed for the entire period of earned leave encashment of the time of retirement.”

4.The said benefits granted to the Government employees were

extended to the employees of all statutory boards and the State public

sector undertakings, vide letter, dated 28.01.2008, by issuing certain

instructions by the Secretary to the Government, Finance (BPE)

Department.

5.According to the petitioners, the instructions given in the letter,

dated 28.01.2008, will take effect from the date of issuance of orders. In

view of the instructions in the Government letter, dated 28.01.2008, it is

applicable retrospectively from the date of issuance of G.O.Ms.No.488,

Finance (Pension) Department, dated 12.08.1996. The petitioners are

eligible to get encashment of unearned leave on private affairs and the right

to get encashment of unearned leave on private affairs is an accrued right.

Hence, the petitioners gave representations, dated 29.07.2019, 29.07.2019

and 27.09.2019 respectively to the first respondent. Since no action has

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.8499, 8501 & 8504 of 2021

been taken on the side of the respondents, the petitioners have come out

with the present Writ Petitions.

6.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the

petitioners are eligible to get encashment of unearned leave on private

affairs and the first respondent, ought to have paid the said amount to the

petitioners and relied on the Judgment of this Court in W.A.No.1352 of

2015, and etc., batch cases, dated 29.06.2016 [The Government of Tamil

Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Environment and Forest

Department, Chennai and others Vs. P.Gurusami].

7.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the

learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

8.From the materials available on record, it is seen that earlier to

G.O.Ms.No.488, Finance (Pension) Department, dated 12.08.1996, the

Government servant was entitled to encashment of entire earned leave

subject to maximum of 240 days standing to the credit of the employees.

There is no provision for encashment of earned leave on private affairs.

Only by G.O.Ms.No.488, Finance (Pension) Department, dated 12.08.1996,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.8499, 8501 & 8504 of 2021

the Government servants were given the benefits of encashment of 50% of

the leave on private affairs standing to their credit upto a maximum of 90

days. The said benefit was given only to the Government employees.

Subsequently, by letter, dated 28.01.2008, the said benefit was extended to

the employees of all State public sector undertakings/Boards. In paragraph

No.4 of the said letter, it is made clear that “these instructions will take

effect from date of issue of orders”. Therefore, the extension of benefits

given to the employees of all statutory boards and public sector

undertakings will be prospective in nature and it has no retrospective effect.

The interpretation given by the petitioners is that the benefits extended by

the letter, dated 28.01.2008, has retrospective effect from the date of

issuance of G.O is contrary to paragraph No.4 of the said letter, dated

28.01.2008. The Judgment relied on by the learned counsel for the

petitioners in W.A.No.1352 of 2015 and etc., batch cases, dated 29.06.2016

is not applicable to the facts of the present case. The present issue was not

an issue before the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1352 of 2015 and

etc., batch cases and the Division Bench of this Court did not give any

finding that the letter, dated 28.01.2008, has retrospective effect. When the

petitioners in W.P(MD)Nos.8499 & 8504 of 2020, retired on 31.04.2004 and

31.12.2003 respectively, on voluntary retirement and the petitioner in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.8499, 8501 & 8504 of 2021

W.P(MD)No.8501 of 2021 retired from service on attaining the age of

superannuation on 30.06.2006, the scheme of encashment of earned leave

on private affairs was not in force and therefore, the petitioners are not

entitled to the said benefit.

9.For the above reasons, these Writ Petitions are dismissed. No costs.

15.06.2021 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ps

Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.8499, 8501 & 8504 of 2021

V.M.VELUMANI,J.

ps

To

1.The Chairman and Managing Director, SIDCO, Thiru.V.Ka.Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

2.The Branch Manager, SIDCO, Madurai.

W.P(MD)Nos.8499, 8501 & 8504 of

15.06.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter