Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs S.Vanaja
2021 Latest Caselaw 11528 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11528 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 June, 2021

Madras High Court
The State Of Tamil Nadu vs S.Vanaja on 10 June, 2021
                                                                            W.A.(MD)No.1080 of 2020


                        BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED:10.06.2021

                                                      CORAM:

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
                                                       AND
                                   THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI


                                            W.A.(MD)No.1080 of 2020
                                                     and
                                           C.M.P(MD) No.5890 of 2020


                1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
                  Represented by its Secretary,
                  Educational Department,
                  Chennai.

                2.The Joint Director,
                  Department of School Education,
                  Chennai-600 006.

                3.The District Educational Officer,
                  Ramanathapuram District,
                  Ramanathapuram.

                4.The Headmaster,
                  Government High School,
                  Thirupalaikudi, Tihruvadanai Taluk,
                  Ramanathapuram District.                        ... Appellants/ 1 to 4
                                                                            Respondents

                                                        Vs.

                S.Vanaja                                       ... Respondent/Writ Petitioner


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                1/6
                                                                                   W.A.(MD)No.1080 of 2020


                PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, praying to

                set aside the order dated 28.02.2020 passed in W.P(MD) No.25731 of 2019.



                                            For Appellants      : Mr.A.K.Manickam
                                                                  Standing Counsel for Government
                                            For Respondent      : Mr.K.Mahendran


                                                        JUDGEMENT

************ [Judgment of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.]

This Writ Appeal by the State is directed against the order dated

28.02.2020, in W.P(MD).No.25731 of 2019, filed by the respondent herein.

2.The said Writ petition was disposed of by common order along with

another Writ Petition in W.P(MD).No.17347 of 2018. However, the appellants

have not filed separate appeal against the said order.

3.We have heard Mr.A.K.Manickam, learned Standing Counsel for

Government appearing for the appellants and Mr.K.Mahendran, learned counsel

appearing for the respondent.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A.(MD)No.1080 of 2020

4.The matter in issue is with regard to the entitlement of the

respondent to secure employment on compassionate ground on account of

demise of her mother. Admitted facts are there that during the life time of her

mother, the petitioner's father married another woman and she was left alone to

take care of her children, including the respondent herein. The respondent's

mother died in harness on 17.05.1985 and the respondent had given an

application as early as in the year 1996 itself for grant of appointment on

compassionate ground. Initially, the application was rejected by an order dated

24.02.2011 on the ground that it was not submitted within three years from the

date of demise of the employee. This order was challenged in W.P.(MD).No.

4115 of 2011 and the order was set aside by order dated 10.02.2017. Thereafter,

the respondent/writ petitioner pursued the matter once again. However, on the

second time, the application was rejected on the ground that the respondent's

brother has become a qualified lawyer and that she was married. This order was

put to challenge in W.P(MD).No.17347 of 2018. When the writ petition was

pending, the third order was passed stating that the application filed for

compassionate appointment is belated and cannot be considered. So far the

order passed in W.P(MD).No.17347 of 2018 is concerned, it has become final,

since the appellants have not filed any appeal against the said order. So far the

order impugned in W.P(MD).No.25731 of 2019 is concerned, the appellants

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A.(MD)No.1080 of 2020

cannot raise the issue regarding the delay in filing the application because of the

order dated 10.02.2017 in W.P(MD).No.4115 of 2011. Therefore, the order of

rejection dated 24.07.2019 has to be set aside.

5.In the result, the Writ Appeal is dismissed for the reasons assigned

in the preceding paragraphs and the order of rejecting the application for

compassionate appointment is set aside and consequently, there will be a

direction to the appellants to provide appointment to the respondent/Writ

Petitioner on compassionate ground after receiving a certificate issued by the

Revenue Officials regarding financial status of the respondent. This direction

shall be complied with within a period of three months from the date of receipt

of a copy of this Judgment. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous

petition is closed.

                                                                    [T.S.S., J.]   &     [S.A.I., J.]

                                                                            10.06.2021

                Index      : Yes / No
                Internet : Yes / No
                msa/cp/sj




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                                                                                      W.A.(MD)No.1080 of 2020




Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

1.The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Educational Department, Chennai.

2.The Joint Director, Department of School Education, Chennai-600 006.

3.The District Educational Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

4.The Headmaster, Government High School, Thirupalaikudi, Tihruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A.(MD)No.1080 of 2020

T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.

AND S.ANANTHI, J.

msa/cp/sj

JUDGEMENT MADE IN W.A.(MD)No.1080 of 2020 and C.M.P(MD) No.5890 of 2020

10.06.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter