Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Murugeshwari vs N.Balamurugan
2021 Latest Caselaw 15097 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15097 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2021

Madras High Court
M.Murugeshwari vs N.Balamurugan on 28 July, 2021
                                                                        C.M.A.Nos.4047 & 4087 of 2019

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 28.07.2021

                                                      CORAM :

                                   THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN
                                                    and
                                      THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

                                            C.M.A.Nos.4047 & 4087 of 2019
                                                         and
                                           C.M.P.Nos.22861 & 23072 of 2019


                     M.Murugeshwari                             ...Appellant in both the Appeals

                                                           Vs


                     N.Balamurugan                           ... Respondent in both the Appeals

                     COMMON PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under
                     Section 19 (3) of Family Courts Act, 1934 against the common Judgment
                     and Decree dated 27.06.2019 passed in H.M.O.P.No.3166 of 2010 and
                     I.A.No.1 of 2019 in H.M.O.P.No.3166 of 2010 on the file of Principal
                     Family Court, Chennai.


                                   For Appellant in both Appeals     : Mr.M.Deivanandam.

                                   For Respondent in both Appeals     : Mr.V.Neethidurai.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     1/7
                                                                       C.M.A.Nos.4047 & 4087 of 2019




                                          COMMON JUDGMENT
                           (Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.KIRUBAKARAN, J)

                                   These matters have been heard through "Video Conference".



                                   2.These Appeals have been preferred by the Appellant / wife

                     against the allowing of divorce Petition in H.M.O.P.No.3166 of 2010 and

                     the dismissal of the Petition seeking restitution of conjugal rights in

                     I.A.No.1 of 2019 in H.M.O.P.No.3166 of 2010 by the Principal Judge,

                     Principal Family court, Chennai.



                                   3.The Appellant and the Respondent got married on

                     07.09.2009. After marriage, within two months, they have got separated

                     on 02.11.2009 and thereafter, the parties cannot reunite. Therefore, the

                     Respondent filed a divorce Petition in H.M.O.P.No.3166 of 2010 and in

                     the said Original Petition, the Appellant filed a Petition in I.A.No.1 of

                     2019 for restitution of conjugal rights. On contest, the divorce Petition

                     filed by the Respondent was allowed and the petition seeking restitution

                     of conjugal rights filed by the Appellant was dismissed. Against the said

                     common Judgment and Decree, these Appeals have been filed by the


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     2/7
                                                                         C.M.A.Nos.4047 & 4087 of 2019

                     Appellant / wife.

                                   4.Heard   Mr.M.Deivanandam, Learned         Counsel      for   the

                     Appellant and Mr.V.Neethidurai, Learned Counsel for the Respondent in

                     both the Appeals.



                                   5.When the matter is called today, both the parties are present

                     before this Court through Video Conference and they categorically stated

                     that they do not want to live together and willing to get separated. In this

                     regard, memo of compromise dated 26.07.2021 signed by both the parties

                     and counter signed by their respective Counsel has been filed before this

                     Court.



                                   6.A perusal of the memo of compromise would reveal that the

                     Appellant accepted a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs only)

                     which has been paid by the Respondent / husband by way of demand

                     draft vide D.D.No.549647, drawn on TM Bank, Royapuram Branch and

                     they have categorically stated that they have got no claim against each

                     other and they have also exchanged their articles. It is also stated that in

                     spite of the divorce decree granted by the trial Court on the ground of

                     cruelty, both the parties agreed to get the marriage dissolved by mutual
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     3/7
                                                                          C.M.A.Nos.4047 & 4087 of 2019

                     consent.

                                   7.Considering the fact that the Parties are living separately for

                     more than eleven years and the categorical statement made before this

                     Court that they do not want to live together and in view of the memo of

                     compromise, no purpose will be achieved by hearing the matter on

                     merits.



                                   8.In view of the above, the common order passed by the trial

                     Court in H.M.O.P.No.3166 of 2010 and in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in

                     H.M.O.P.No.3166 of 2010 is modified and decree of divorce is granted

                     by mutual consent. Accordingly, these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are

                     disposed of in terms of memo of compromise. The memo of compromise

                     shall form part of the decree and Judgment. No costs. Consequently,

                     connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.



                                                                (N.K.K.,J.)         (P.T.A.,J.)
                                                                           28.07.2021
                     ay

                     Index:Yes/No
                     Internet:Yes/No

                     Note: Registry is directed to issue order

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     4/7
                                                         C.M.A.Nos.4047 & 4087 of 2019

                                   copy on 06.08.2021.


                     To

                     The Principal Family Court,
                     Chennai.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     5/7
                                            C.M.A.Nos.4047 & 4087 of 2019




                                             N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.

and P.T.ASHA, J.

ay

C.M.A.Nos.4047 & 4087 of 2019 and C.M.P.Nos.22861 & 23072 of 2019

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.Nos.4047 & 4087 of 2019

Dated: 28.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter