Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Branch Manager vs K.Elangovan
2021 Latest Caselaw 14986 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14986 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2021

Madras High Court
The Branch Manager vs K.Elangovan on 27 July, 2021
                                                                            C.M.A.(MD)No.389 of 2014



                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  Dated :27.07.2021

                                                      CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. THARANI

                                             C.M.A.(MD)No.389 of 2014
                                             and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2014

            The Branch Manager,
            Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited,
            Karanthai,
            Thanjavur.                                                     ..Appellant

                                                         Vs.

            K.Elangovan                                                    .. Respondent

            Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor
            Vehicles Act, 1988, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 19.01.2009, passed in
            M.C.O.P.No.706 of 2005 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims
            Tribunal/Additional Sub Court, Thanjavur.
                            For Appellant               : Mr.P.Prabhakaran
                            For Respondent              : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan


                                                        JUDGMENT

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the award passed

in M.C.O.P.No.706 of 2005 dated 19.01.2009, on the file of the Motor Accidents

Claims Tribunal/Additional Sub Court, Thanjavur.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.(MD)No.389 of 2014

2.The appellant herein is the respondent and the respondent herein is the

claimant in the claim petition. The respondent herein has filed a claim petition in

M.C.O.P.No.706 of 2005, claiming compensation for the injuries sustained by the

claimant, in an accident that took place on 19.02.2005. The Tribunal has awarded a

sum of Rs.68,115/- (Rupees Sixty Eight Thousand One Hundred and Fifteen only) as

compensation. Against which, the appellant has preferred this appeal.

3.A brief substance of the claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.706 of 2005 is as

follows:

On 19.02.2005, at about 03.45 p.m., when the claimant was travelling as a

pillion rider in a TVS 50 bearing registration No.TN-49-E-2435, a bus bearing

registration No.TN-49-S-0479 was driven by its driver in a rash and negligent

manner came from the opposite direction dashed against the claimant's vehicle and

the claimant sustained injuries and he took treatment as 'inpatient' from 19.02.2005

till 22.02.2005. Then he took treatment as 'out patient'. The claimant claimed a sum

of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only) as compensation.

4.A brief substance of the counter filed by the respondent therein is as

follows:

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.(MD)No.389 of 2014

The accident was not due to rash and negligent driving of the bus driver.

The claimant has to prove the mode of accident, nature of injury and the treatment

expenses.

5.On the side of the petitioner therein, two witnesses were examined and

seven documents were marked. On the side of the respondents therein, no witness

was examined and no document was marked. After trial, the Tribunal has awarded a

sum of Rs.68,115/- (Rupees Sixty Eight Thousand One Hundred and Fifteen only) as

compensation to be paid by the appellant herein. Against which, the appellant has

preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

6.On the side of the appellant, it is stated that the Tribunal has calculated

the award amount wrongly. The Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.1,500/- for each

percentage of the disability. The Tribunal fixed the disability as 18%. Instead of

calculating the compensation for disability as Rs.27,000/-, the Tribunal has wrongly

awarded Rs.37,000/-. The award of compensation under all other heads is excessive.

7.On the side of the respondent, it is admitted that there was an arithmetic

mistake in the calculation of the award amount.

8.A perusal of the records reveals that the Tribunal has awarded a sum of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.(MD)No.389 of 2014

Rs.1,500/- for each percentage of disability. For 18% disability, the Tribunal has

wrongly mentioned as Rs.37,000/- instead of Rs.27,000/- and the same has to be

corrected. The compensation awarded under all other heads are reasonable.

9.In the result, this Civil Miscellenaous Appeal is partly allowed. The

respondent is entitled to a sum of Rs.58,115/- (Rupees Fifty Eight Thousand One

Hundred and Fifteen only) as compensation with interest at the rate of 7.5% from the

date of the claim petition till the date of realization.

10.The appellant is directed to deposit Rs.58,115/- (Rupees Fifty Eight

Thousand One Hundred and Fifteen only) with 7.5% interest from date of the claim

petition till the date of realization and the amount if not deposited earlier, has to be

deposited within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

On such deposit, the respondent is permitted to withdraw the award amount with

proportionate interest after deducting any amount received by him earlier without

filing any formal petition before the Tribunal. Excess amount, if any deposited shall

be refunded to the appellant. The respondent is not entitled for interest for the default

period, if there is any. No Costs. Consequently, M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2014 is closed.



                                                                                      27.07.2021
            Index    : Yes/No
            Internet : Yes/No


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                           C.M.A.(MD)No.389 of 2014




Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID – 19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To

1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal Sub Judge, Thanjavur.

2.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.(MD)No.389 of 2014

R. THARANI, J.

MRN

C.M.A.(MD)No.389 of 2014

27.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter