Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.Subramanian vs The Deputy Superintendent Of ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 14964 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14964 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2021

Madras High Court
V.Subramanian vs The Deputy Superintendent Of ... on 27 July, 2021
                                                                             Crl.A(MD)No.283 of 2021


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED : 27.07.2021

                                                    CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.KRISHNAVALLI

                                           Crl.A(MD)No.283 of 2021

                  V.Subramanian                                     ... Appellant/Accused

                                                       Vs.


                  1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
                    Cheranmahadevi,
                    Tirunelveli.

                  2.The State Represented by,
                    The Sub Inspector of Police,
                    Munnerpallam Police Station,
                    Tirunelveli District.
                    (Cr.No.302 of 2021)                    ...1st & 2nd Respondents/Complainants


                  3.M.Balamurugesh                     ... 3rd Respondent/Defacto Complainant

                  Prayer : This Appeal is filed under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes
                  and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, to call for the
                  entire records pertaining to the order passed by the II Additional District &
                  Sessions Judge (PCR), Tirunelveli in Cr.M.P.No.754 of 2021, dated
                  05.07.2021 and set aside the same and consequently enlarge the appellant on
                  bail in connection with the case in Crime No.302 of 2021 on the file of the
                  Inspector of Police, Munnerpallam Police Station, Tirunelveli.


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                  1/6
                                                                                   Crl.A(MD)No.283 of 2021


                                   For Appellant      : Mr.A.Sivasubramanian
                                   For R-1 & R-2     : Mr.RMS.Sethuraman
                                                        Standing Counsel
                                                        for State Government (Crl.side)
                                   For R3             : No Appearance


                                                      JUDGMENT

Heard Mr.A.Sivasubramanian, learned counsel appearing for the

appellant and Mr.RMS.Sethuraman, learned Standing Counsel appearing for

State Government (Crl.side). No representation for the third respondent.

2.This Criminal Appeal has been filed to set aside the dismissal

order of the bail petition in Cr.M.P.No.754 of 2021 on the file of the learned

II Additional District & Sessions Judge (FAC), Tirunelveli, dated 05.07.2021.

3.The Appellant, who arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

18.06.2021, for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 307

& 506(ii) IPC and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of the Schedule Castes

and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015, on

the file of the respondent police, seeks appeal bail.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit

that the appellant has been falsely implicated in this case and the same has not https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Crl.A(MD)No.283 of 2021

been considered properly and the appellant is in custody from 18.06.2021

onwards.

5.Mr.RMS.Sethuraman, learned Standing Counsel appearing for

State Government (Crl.side), on instructions, would submit that the appellant

herein is arrayed as sole accused. He would further submit that if the

appellant/Sole Accused is released on bail, he will tamper with the

prosecution witnesses and hamper the investigation and therefore, he strongly

opposed to grant bail to the appellant.

6.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this

Court is inclined to allow the Criminal Appeal by setting aside the order,

dated 05.07.2021 made in Cr.M.P.No.754 of 2021 on the file of the learned II

Additional District & Sessions Judge (FAC), Tirunelveli.

7.Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is allowed and the order, dated

05.07.2021 made in Cr.M.P.No.754 of 2021 on the file of the learned II

Additional District & Sessions Judge (FAC), Tirunelveli, is set aside. The

appellant is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum

of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Crl.A(MD)No.283 of 2021

sum to the satisfaction of the learned II Additional District & Sessions Judge

(FAC), Tirunelveli, and on further condition that:

[a] the appellant shall appear before the concerned court, once in a week i.e. on the first working day of every week at 10.30 a.m. until further orders;

[b] the appellant shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[c] the appellant shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the appellant in accordance with law, as if the conditions have been imposed and the appellants released on bail by the Trial Court itelf as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].




                                                                                  27.07.2021

                  Index    : Yes/No
                  Internet : Yes/No
                  vsd




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                                                                              Crl.A(MD)No.283 of 2021




Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1.The II Additional District & Sessions Judge (FAC), Tirunelveli.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli.

3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Munnerpallam Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Crl.A(MD)No.283 of 2021

T.KRISHNAVALLI, J.

vsd

Crl.A(MD)No.283 of 2021

27.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter