Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Stalin vs The Director Of School Education
2021 Latest Caselaw 14408 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14408 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2021

Madras High Court
K.Stalin vs The Director Of School Education on 19 July, 2021
                                                                                 W.P.No 13123 of 2021

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                 DATED: 19.07.2021
                                                       CORAM:
                                    THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
                                               W.P. No. 13123 of 2021
                                         and W.M.P. No.13923 & 13929 of 2021

                1.K.Stalin
                2.R.Mani Bharathi
                3.N.Parimala
                4.S.Manjula
                5.N.Sathish                                                             .. Petitioners

                                                          Versus

                1.The Director of School Education,
                  Directorate of School Education,
                  DPI Campus, College Road,
                  Chennai – 600 006.

                2.Teachers Recruitment Board,
                  Rep. by its Chairman,
                  4th Floor, EVK Sampath Maaligai,
                  College Road, Chennai – 600 006.                                   .. Respondents



                          Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying

                to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to comply with the order

                of this Hon'ble Court dated 26.06.2018 in W.P. Nos.27692 of 2017 etc. and

                consequently direct the respondents to call the petitioners for Certificate

                Verification for the post of PG Assistants and issue appointment orders as PG


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                1/8
                                                                                 W.P.No 13123 of 2021

                Assistants in their respective subjects pursuant to Notification in Advertisement

                No.03/2017 dated 09.05.2017 issued by the second respondent.



                                   For Petitioners         : Ms. Nalini Chidambaram
                                                             for Mr. Kanchi Kailasam

                                   For Respondent-1        : Mr. C.Kathiravan
                                                             Government Advocate
                                                     2     : No appearance

                                                           ***

O RD E R

This Writ Petition is filed for issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the

respondents to comply with the order of this Court dated 26.06.2018 in W.P.

Nos.27692 of 2017 etc. and consequently direct the respondents to call the

petitioners for Certificate Verification for the post of PG Assistants and issue

appointment orders as PG Assistants in their respective subjects pursuant to

Notification in Advertisement No.03/2017 dated 09.05.2017 issued by the

second respondent.

2. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the

second respondent issued a recruitment notification dated 09.05.2017 calling

for the application for Post Graduate Assistants / Physical Education Directors

Grade – I, in school education and other departments for the year 2016-2017

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.No 13123 of 2021

against a total vacancy of 1663. He further states that the petitioners also have

applied for the post of P.G.Assistants pursuant to the notification dated

09.05.2017. It is admitted that the written examination was held by the second

respondent on 02.07.2017 and that all the petitioners have appeared in the

written examination. The second respondent has also published the tentative

answers for all the questions on the board's website on 19.07.2017. It appears

that the petitioners have some grievance about the right answers. Later the

petitioner submitted their objections regarding the key answers. Since the same

was not considered, the petitioners filed a batch of writ petitions for issuing a

writ of mandamus directing the respondents to award one mark each to question

Nos.6, 23, 25, 34 & 93 in question Set A in the examination conducted.

Learned senior counsel further states that the petitioners also sought for a

consequential direction to the respondents to appoint the petitioners in the post

of Post Graduate Assistants. During the pendency of the writ petition, the

second respondent Board published the provisional result of the written

competitive examination on 11.08.2017. By a common judgment dated

26.06.2018, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners in W.P. No.27692 to

27695 of 2017 and 24184 to 24192 of 2017, were allowed by a learned single

Judge of this Court. The respondents were directed to conduct the certificate

verification for the petitioners herein who are the petitioners in W.P. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.No 13123 of 2021

Nos.27692, 24189, 24190, 24191 & 24187 of 2017, after holding that the

petitioners have secured over and above the cut-off mark fixed by TRB.

3. Aggrieved by the judgment of the learned single Judge in batch of

writ petitions, the respondents filed a batch of writ appeals with a delay of 278

days. By a common order in all the batch cases, the petitions to condone the

delay of 278 days were dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court. The Writ

Appeals were also consequently rejected. Against the order of dismissal, the

respondents filed a Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

S.L.P. Nos.25262 to 25271 if 2019. On 22.11.2019, the Hon'ble Supreme Court

passed an order of stay of operation of the impugned judgment. It is to be seen

that the interim order of stay of operation does not affect the direction of this

Court by the learned Single Judge in the writ petitions. The impugned judgment

that was referred to in the order of Hon'ble Supreme Court is the judgment of

Division Bench dismissing the petition to condone the delay of 278 days in

filing the writ appeals and rejecting the appeals. It is in the said background,

the above writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to comply with

the order of this Court earlier in the batch of writ petitions.

4. Considering the facts narrated by the learned senior counsel appearing

for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the first

respondent, this Court is of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of on https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.No 13123 of 2021

the facts admitted and narrated. Despite the respondents having preferred an

appeal as against the order dismissing the respondents' petition to condone the

delay of 278 days in preferring the appeals, the respondents cannot refuse to

comply with the direction of this Court in the writ petition where they are

parties. In view of the context in which the present writ petition is filed, this

Court is unable to find any reason for not complying with the direction in the

absence of any stay. Since a positive direction is issued against the respondents,

this Court is able to see that the conduct of respondents is nothing but

contumacious.

5. In the present case, the order passed by the learned single Judge

allowing the writ petition filed by the petitioners is dated 26.06.2018. After a

period of three years, the only excuse comes from the respondents is pendency

of the Special Leave Petition which is only against the order dismissing the

petition to condone the delay of 278 days in preferring the appeal. The order

passed in the batch of writ appeals is in the appeal yet to be numbered.

Therefore, this Court may not consider the writ appeals as something to keep

alive the litigation between the parties. It is a still born appeal and hence cannot

be considered as a reason or excuse for the respondents to disobey the direction

of learned single Judge of this Court which was about three years back. In the

present state of affairs, this Court has no other option but to issue directions https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.No 13123 of 2021

which is only in the nature of implementing or giving effect to the verdict of

this Court earlier in a batch of writ petitions.

6. This writ petition is allowed with the direction to the respondents to

comply with the order of this Court dated 26.06.2018, within a period of four

weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, liberty is

preserved to the respondents to pursue the case before Hon'ble Supreme Court

and thereafter, the appeal they have preferred in writ appeal if they succeed

before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In other words, without prejudice to the

rights of the respondents to prosecute the Special Leave Petition, the direction

of this Court by the learned single Judge dated 26.06.2018 can be implemented.

It is open to the respondents to revoke selection process pursuant to this order

in case they are successful before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and thereafter,

before the Division Bench to set aside the order of learned single Judge dated

26.06.2018. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are

closed.

19.07.2021

Index:Yes / No Speaking order / Non speaking order

bkn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.No 13123 of 2021

To

1.The Director of School Education, Directorate of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

2.The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, 4th Floor, EVK Sampath Maaligai, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.No 13123 of 2021

S.S.SUNDAR. J.,

bkn

W.P. No. 13123 of 2021

19.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter