Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

D.D.Deenadayalan vs The State Represented By
2021 Latest Caselaw 14282 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14282 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 July, 2021

Madras High Court
D.D.Deenadayalan vs The State Represented By on 16 July, 2021
                                                                              Crl.O.P.Nos.11007 of 2021 and batch


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED : 16.07.2021

                                                           CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

                     Crl.O.P.Nos.11007, 11008, 11009, 11010, 11011, 11012, 11015, 11051,
                    11052, 11054, 11055, 11056, 11058, 11059, 11161, 11162, 11163, 11164,
                   11165, 11167, 11168, 11169, 11170, 11172, 11173, 11174 & 11175 of 2021

                Crl.O.P.No.11007 of 2021
                D.D.Deenadayalan                                   ... Petitioner in all cases
                                                            Vs.
                The State represented by,
                Inspector of Police,
                District Crime Branch,
                Thiruvallur District.                              ... Respondent in all cases

                PRAYER in Crl.O.P.No.11007 of 2021: Criminal Original Petition is filed
                under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the learned
                Judicial Magistrate, Thiruthani to recall the Non Bailable Warrant issued
                against the petitioner in C.C.No.60 of 2018, dated 10.02.2021 pending on the
                file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruthani.

                                    In all cases:
                                    For Petitioner     :     Mr.A.Saravanan

                                    For Respondent     :     Mr.E.Raj Thilak,
                                                             Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

                                                         *****

COMMON ORDER

The petitioner, who is the first accused in all the cases, has filed these

petitions to recall the Non Bailable Warrants issued against him in all the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.Nos.11007 of 2021 and batch

cases, dated 11.01.2021, 21.01.2021, 27.01.2021, 01.02.2021, 06.02.2021,

10.02.2021, 16.02.2021, 17.02.2021, 22.02.2021, 23.02.2021, 24.02.2021,

26.02.2021, 01.03.2021, 05.03.2021, 09.03.2021, 10.03.2021, 17.03.2021,

15.04.2021 and 04.05.2021 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruthani.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is

the Chairman and Managing Trustee of M/s.D.D Medical and Educational

Trust. M/s.D.D Medical College and Hospital was established by the

petitioner in the year 2010 and was affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R

Medical University. For the academic year 2010-2011, the entrance exam was

conducted by the Dean of M/s.D.D Medical College and Hospital. The

admission of the students was subjected to approval of MCI University and as

per the guidelines of the Hon'ble Apex Court. Accordingly, totally 150

students were admitted in M/s.D.D Medical College and Hospital by the Tamil

Nadu Dr.M.G.R Medical University and approved by MCI. All exams were

conducted by the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R Medical University for the first,

second and third year MBBS students and the university examination results

were duly published in the website of the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R Medical

University. For the subsequent academic year 2011-2012, the renewal

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.Nos.11007 of 2021 and batch

permission for the admission of students for the academic year 2011-2012 was

granted by MCI and the same was kept with custody of the then Secretary,

MCI viz., Sangeetha Sharma, who demanded Rs.30 Crores for communication

of the order of renewal of permission and approval for admission of students.

Thereafter, the petitioner lodged a complaint dated 22.07.2011 to the Central

Vigilance Commission and to the Director of the Central Bureau of

Investigation and other officials. Finally, the MCI statutory body was

dissolved on 25.09.2020 due to number of malpractices. The refusal for

renewal of permission, the petitioner's College had filed Writ Petitions, Writ

Appeals before this Court and later, SLP was preferred before the Hon'ble

Apex Court. Pending litigations, for the academic year 2012-2013, the

students were also admitted. Since the petitioner made complaint against MCI

to the Central Vigilance Commission and to the Director of the Central Bureau

of Investigation, the petitioner was targeted and victimized.

3.The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner's college had

given an advertisement in the newspaper for the academic year 2011-2012 and

2012-2013 and the entrance conducted was by the Dean of M/s.D.D Medical

College and Hospital and list of meritorious students and their ranks were

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.Nos.11007 of 2021 and batch

posted in the college website and same were submitted to the Tamil Nadu

Dr.M.G.R Medical University for their perusal and consideration. In the

advertisement, it is clearly mentioned that the admission is provisional,

subject to approval by MCI University or direction of this Court. This being

the case, several students, their parents and others lodged a complaint against

the petitioner for offence under Sections 406, 420, 204(b) and 506(i) r/w 34

IPC. During the year 2012-13, totally 35 cases have been registered and final

report have been filed in all the cases are as follows:-

                        S.No.             Crime Number                     Case Number











                          12       Crime Nos.26, 27 & 28 of 2013      C.C.No.62 of 2018
                          13       Crime Nos.29, 30 & 31 of 2013      C.C.No.63 of 2018
                          14       Crime Nos.32, 33 & 34 of 2013      C.C.No.64 of 2018




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                          Crl.O.P.Nos.11007 of 2021 and batch


                        S.No.             Crime Number                   Case Number
                          16       Crime Nos.35, 36 & 37 of 2013       C.C.No.80 of 2018
                          17       Crime Nos.38, 39 & 40 of 2013       C.C.No.81 of 2018





                          23       Crime Nos.54, 56 & 58 of 2018      C.C.No.108 of 2018







                          31       Crime Nos.57, 59 & 63 of 2013       C.C.No.37 of 2019

                          33       Crime Nos.69, 71 & 72 of 2013       C.C.No.39 of 2019





4.During the pendency of the above cases, the petitioner filed discharge

petitions in almost all the cases. The discharge petitions were dismissed by

the trial Court without granting sufficient time to argue the case. Thereafter,

the petitioner applied for certified copy of the orders to file revision against

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.Nos.11007 of 2021 and batch

the dismissal of the discharge petitions. Sofar the petitioner has not received

the order copies and the petitioner's statutory right was curtailed.

5.The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the

petitioner has been regularly appearing before the trial Court till December

2020. In the month of December 2020, the petitioner tested positive for

COVID-19 and took treatment for the same. The petitioner is having Chronic

Sugar level, high blood pressure and heart issues and he was advised to take

bed rest and to avoid movement and he was prone for COVID-19 because of

the other health issues and hence, he had to be in self isolation almost all the

period. During quarantine, the petitioner was regularly represented through

his counsel before the trial Court. The petitioner filed a memo informing the

trial Court about his health condition. This Court as well as the Hon'ble Apex

Court had given directions not to take coercive action in view of the

prevailing COVID-19 pandemic situation. On the other hand, the trial Court

recorded that due to the direction of this Court to complete the cases within a

period of three months, the petitioner not informed the place of treatment, the

petitioner despite aware about the directions of this Court, failed to produce

the medical records and except the petitioner, the other accused are appearing

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.Nos.11007 of 2021 and batch

before the trial Court, issued the Non Bailable Warrants against him in the

following cases:-

                                   S.No.     Calender Case      Date of Warrant
                                                Number              Issued
                                    1.     C.C.No.21 of 2013      11.01.2021
                                    2.     C.C.No.22 of 2013      21.01.2021
























https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                         Crl.O.P.Nos.11007 of 2021 and batch


                                   S.No.     Calender Case      Date of Warrant
                                                Number              Issued






6.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing on behalf of

the respondent submitted that the petitioner is the cause for the delay in

progress of the trial. In this case, the final reports have been filed from the

year 2013 onwards till 2019. The petitioner by adopting dilatory tactics,

dragging on the proceedings and not allowing the trial Court to complete the

trial. There is a direction of this Court to complete the trial within a stipulated

period. The petitioner though informed through the memo that he is taking

treatment for COVID-19 and he is in self isolation, the particulars and details

were not submitted to the trial Court. Hence, Non Bailable Warrants were

issued against him. The petitioner is absconding accused and all efforts are

taken to secure him. He would be secured shortly.

7.This Court considered the rival submissions and perused the materials

available on record.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.Nos.11007 of 2021 and batch

8.The Non Bailable Warrants have been issued from the month of

January 2021 to May 2021 against the petitioner in the above cases. Till date

the respondent Police is unable to execute the warrants. Now, the petitioner

has come forward to recall the Non Bailable Warrants with an undertaking that

he will cooperate with the trial and, will not be the reason for any delay in

progress of the trial.

9.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on the

undertaking given by the petitioner, this Court directs the learned Judicial

Magistrate, Thiruthani to recall the Non Bailable Warrants issued against the

petitioner in all the cases with the following conditions:-

(i)The petitioner shall file an affidavit in each case that in all future

hearings, he or his counsel shall appear and cooperate with the trial and they

will not be cause for any delay in any manner.

(ii)The petitioner shall cross examine the prosecution witnesses in all

the cases then and there without seeking adjournments.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.Nos.11007 of 2021 and batch

(iii)The petitioner shall appear before the trial Court at the time of

framing of charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C., and at the time of

receiving the judgment and as and when the petitioner is directed by the trial

Court to appear in the cases.

(iv)The petitioner voluntarily came forward to pay Rs.5,000/- in each

case (Rs.5,000/- X 27 cases challenged in the above petitions = Rs.1,35,000/-)

to the Bar Association, Thiruthani; the Advocate Association, Thiruthani and

the Lawyers Association, Thiruthani. The petitioner shall pay the said amount

of Rs.1,35,000/- to the three Associations (each Rs.45,000/-) and produce the

receipt of the same, at the time of filing of the affidavit, before the trial Court.

10.With the above directions, all Criminal Original Petitions are

disposed of.

16.07.2021

Speaking order/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No

vv2

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.Nos.11007 of 2021 and batch

To

1.The Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruthani.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thiruvallur District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.Nos.11007 of 2021 and batch

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

vv2

Crl.O.P.Nos.11007, 11008, 11009, 11010, 11011, 11012, 11015, 11051, 11052, 11054, 11055, 11056, 11058, 11059, 11161, 11162, 11163, 11164, 11165, 11167, 11168, 11169, 11170, 11172, 11173, 11174 & 11175 of 2021

16.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter