Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Deputy Inspector General Of ... vs V.S.Ilangovan
2021 Latest Caselaw 13741 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13741 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 July, 2021

Madras High Court
The Deputy Inspector General Of ... vs V.S.Ilangovan on 9 July, 2021
                                                                       REV.APLC.(MD)No.44 of 2021


                        BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                   DATED: 09.07.2021

                                                       CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
                                                          and
                                    THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI


                                            REV.APLC.(MD)No.44 of 2021
                                                       IN
                                              W.A.(MD)No.908 of 2017
                                                      AND
                                             C.M.P.(MD)No.5725 of 2021


                     1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police,
                        Madurai Region,
                        Madurai.


                     2.The Superintendent of Police,
                        Virudhunagar,
                        Virudhunagar District.


                     3.The Additional Deputy
                               Superintendent of Police (Crime),
                        Officer of Superintendent of Police,
                        Virudhunagar,
                        Virudhunagar District.                     ... Petitioners/Appellants
                                                           Vs.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     1/4
                                                                           REV.APLC.(MD)No.44 of 2021




                     V.S.Ilangovan,
                     Head Constable,
                     Pandalgudi Police Station,
                     Virudhunagar District.                                      ... Respondent


                     PRAYER: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 of

                     Civil Procedure Code r/w. Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code, to

                     review the order passed in W.A.(MD)No.908 of 2017 dated 25.09.2019.



                                       For Petitioners   : Mr.R.Baskaran
                                                          Standing Counsel for Government



                                                          ORDER

************ [Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.]

We have heard Mr.R.Baskaran, learned Standing counsel appearing

for the petitioners.

2. This review application has been filed to review the judgment

and order dated 25.09.2019 in W.A.(MD)No.908 of 2017.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

REV.APLC.(MD)No.44 of 2021

3. The review petitioners would contend that the decision referred

to in the impugned judgment cannot be mechanically applied and charge

memo could not be quashed.

4. On a reading of the judgment, we find that the said decision has

not been mechanically applied, but the facts are taken into consideration

and the inordinate delay of seven years was taken note of and the writ

appeal was allowed. Hence, we find no ground to review our decision.

The petitioners have not been able to point out any error, which is

apparent on the face of the order. Hence, the Review Petition is

dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected C.M.P. is closed.


                                                                [T.S.S., J.] & [R.T., J.]
                                                                          09.07.2021
                     Index         : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     ls/akv
                     Note:

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

REV.APLC.(MD)No.44 of 2021

T.S.SIVAGNANAM., J.

and R.THARANI., J.

Ls/akv

ORDER MADE IN REV.APLC.(MD)No.44 of 2021 IN W.A.(MD)No.908 of 2017

09.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter