Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Balasubramanian vs Shanthi Hosiery
2021 Latest Caselaw 13575 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13575 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2021

Madras High Court
R.Balasubramanian vs Shanthi Hosiery on 8 July, 2021
                                                                   C.S.No.715 of 1998

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                             DATED : 08.07.2021

                                                   CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

                                              C.S.No.715 of 1998

                     R.Balasubramanian                                ...Plaintiff

                                                        .Vs.


                     1.Shanthi Hosiery,
                       14, Nithyadhan Mukerjee Road,
                       Howrah – 711 101.

                     2.Sankaar,

                     3.My Choice,
                       14, Nityadhan Mukherjee Road,
                       (5th Floor), Samabaika Hat,
                       Howrah – 711 101.

                     4.R.R.Roy

                     5.R.K.Traders,
                       14, Nityadhan Mukherjee Road,
                       (5th Floor), Howrah - 711 101.

                     6.Ashok Kumar Daga,
                       14, Nityadhan Mukherjee Road,
                       (5th Floor), Howrah - 711 101.


                     Page No.1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                              C.S.No.715 of 1998

                     7.Sunita Hosiery,
                       13, Nityadhan Mukherjee Road,
                       (4th Floor), Howrah - 711 101.

                     8.S.R.S.Biswajit Saha

                     9.Prodip Chandraroy Nihar Ranjan Roy

                     10.S.R.S. & Sons,
                       14, Nityadhan Mukherjee Road,
                       Samabiyaka Hat (4th Floor)
                       Howrah – 711 101.
                     11.K.C.Jain
                     12.Balaji
                     13.D.Banik                                           ... Defendants


                               Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code and
                     under Sections 105 and 106 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act,
                     1958 and Sections 55 and 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957 praying for a
                     judgment and decree :
                               a) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants
                     themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them
                     from in any manner infringing the plaintiff's well established trade mark
                     M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS by suing the offending trade
                     mark M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS or any other mark or
                     marks which are deceptively similar to or a colourable imitation of the
                     plaintiff's well established trade mark M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN
                     CASUALS;


                     Page No.2/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                  C.S.No.715 of 1998

                               b) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants by
                     themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them
                     from in any manner infringing the plaintiff's copyright over the aritstic
                     work M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS by using the offending
                     artistic work “M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS” or any other
                     work or works which are deceptively similar to or a colourable imitation
                     of the plaintiff's copyright over the artistic work         M-K-M GARRY
                     AMERICAN CASUALS;
                               c) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants
                     themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them
                     from in any manner passing off of their hosiery products including
                     T.Shirts bearing the offending trade mark and artistic work M-K-M
                     GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS as and for the plaintiffs' hosiery
                     products including T.shirts bearing the well established trade mark and
                     copyright over the artistic work            M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN
                     CASUALS, either by selling or offering for sale or in any manner
                     advertising the same;
                               d) directing the defendants to render true and faithful accounts of
                     the profits earned by them by using the offending trade mark and artistic
                     work          M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS and directing the
                     payment of such profits to the plaintiffs by way of damages and
                               e) directing the defendants to surrender to the plaintiffs the entire
                     stock of unused hosiery products including T.shirts bearing the offending
                     “M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS” trade mark label together


                     Page No.3/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                  C.S.No.715 of 1998

                     with the blocks and dyes for destruction and
                               f) for costs of the suit.
                                      For Plaintiff        : No appearance

                                      For Defendant        : No appearance

                                                         ********
                                                     JUDGMENT

The suit has been filed by the plaintiff for a decree and judgment:

a) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants

themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them

from in any manner infringing the plaintiff's well established trade mark

M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS by suing the offending trade

mark M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS or any other mark or

marks which are deceptively similar to or a colourable imitation of the

plaintiff's well established trade mark M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN

CASUALS;

b) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants by

themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them

from in any manner infringing the plaintiff's copyright over the aritstic

work M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS by using the offending

artistic work “M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS” or any other

Page No.4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.715 of 1998

work or works which are deceptively similar to or a colourable imitation

of the plaintiff's copyright over the artistic work M-K-M GARRY

AMERICAN CASUALS;

c) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants

themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them

from in any manner passing off of their hosiery products including

T.Shirts bearing the offending trade mark and artistic work M-K-M

GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS as and for the plaintiffs' hosiery

products including T.shirts bearing the well established trade mark and

copyright over the artistic work M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN

CASUALS, either by selling or offering for sale or in any manner

advertising the same;

d) directing the defendants to render true and faithful accounts of

the profits earned by them by using the offending trade mark and artistic

work M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS and directing the

payment of such profits to the plaintiffs by way of damages and

e) directing the defendants to surrender to the plaintiffs the entire

Page No.5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.715 of 1998

stock of unused hosiery products including T.shirts bearing the offending

“M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS” trade mark label together

with the blocks and dyes for destruction and

f) for costs of the suit.

2. Since the lead counsel for the plaintiff is no more and the other

counsel was serving the on the bench of the Intellectual Property

Appellate Board, I had by order dated 28.04.2021 directed notice to be

issued to the plaintiff. Accordingly a notice is issued and the same was

served on the plaintiff on 05.06.2021. Despite such service the plaintiff

has not chosen to enter appearance to prosecute the suit.

3. The suit is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.



                                                                                       08.07.2021
                     dsa
                     Index      : No
                     Internet   : Yes
                     Non-Speaking order

List of the witnesses examined on the side of the plaintiff: Nil

Page No.6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.715 of 1998

List of Exhibits marked on the side of the plaintiff : Nil List of the witnesses examined on the side of the defendants: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the defendants: Nil

08.07.2021 dsa

Page No.7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.715 of 1998

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

dsa

C.S.No.715 of 1998

08.07.2021

Page No.8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter