Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ganapathi Gounder vs Chandra
2021 Latest Caselaw 13190 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13190 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 July, 2021

Madras High Court
Ganapathi Gounder vs Chandra on 5 July, 2021
                                                                         C.R.P.(PD)No.3325 of 2018

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 05.07.2021

                                                           CORAM

                                   THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                               C.R.P.(PD)No.3325 of 2018

                     Ganapathi Gounder                                        ... Petitioner

                                                            Vs.

                     1. Chandra
                     2. Pounammal
                     3. Valli
                     4. Jeevaraj
                     5. M.Arumugham                                           ... Respondents

                     Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
                     Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated
                     28.04.2017 passed in E.A.No.157 of 2016 in E.P.No.48 of 2013 in
                     O.S.No.162 of 1989 on the file of the Additional District Munsiff,
                     Tirupattur, Vellore District.


                                          For Petitioner     : Mr.K.Mohanamurali

                                          For Respondents : No appearance




                     Page 1 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                              C.R.P.(PD)No.3325 of 2018

                                                            ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is directed as against fair and

decreetal order dated 28.04.2017 passed by the learned Additional District

Munsiff, Tirupattur, Vellore District in E.A.No.157 of 2016 in E.P.No.48 of

2013 in O.S.No.162 of 1989, thereby staying further proceedings of EP.

2. The petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondents 1 to 4 are

third parties and the fifth respondent is the second defendant. The petitioner

filed suit in O.S.162 of 1989 for partition and it was decreed. On the

strength of the decree, the petitioner filed execution petition in E.P.No.48 of

2013 for separate possession. When the execution petition was pending, the

respondents 1 to 4 filed petition in the execution proceedings in E.A.No.157

of 2016 to stay all the proceedings.

3. The case of the respondents 1 to 4 herein is that they are the

sisters of the petitioner herein and the petitioner suppressed the true facts,

filed the suit for partition and obtained decree. In fact, the respondents 1 to

4 had filed suit in O.S.No.56 of 2011 for partition on the file of the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(PD)No.3325 of 2018

Subordinate Court, Tirupattur. The suit property is a joint family property

and all of them are jointly in possession and enjoyment of the suit property.

Therefore, till the disposal of the suit filed by them, the execution

proceedings should be stayed. Considering the facts, the Court below stayed

all the proceedings and terminated the main execution petition itself.

Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed this present Civil Revision

Petition.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit

that now the suit filed by the respondents 1 to 4 herein, in O.S.No.56 of

2011 was dismissed by the judgment and decree dated 14.02.2018. He

further submitted that at least the Court below may keep the matter pending

till the disposal of the suit filed by the respondents 1 to 4. Without doing so,

the execution Court dismissed the main execution petition itself. Hence, he

prayed to allow this petition.

5. On a perusal of the impugned order revealed that the execution

Court allowed the stay petition only for the reason that the respondents 1 to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(PD)No.3325 of 2018

4 are the joint owners of the suit property and they also filed suit in

O.S.No.56 of 2011. In view of the order dated 14.02.2018 passed in

O.S.No.56 of 2011, thereby dismissing the suit, the order passed by the

execution Court is illegal and liable to be set aside.

6. Accordingly, the order dated 28.04.2017 passed by the learned

Additional District Munsiff, Tirupattur, Vellore District in E.A.No.157 of

2016 in E.P.No.48 of 2013 in O.S.No.162 of 1989 is hereby set aside and

the execution Court is directed to dispose the execution petition in

E.P.No.48 of 2013, within the period of three months from the date of

receipt of a copy of this Order.

7. With the above directions, this Civil Revision Petition is

allowed. There shall be no order as to cost.

05.07.2021 Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order rts

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(PD)No.3325 of 2018

To

1. The Additional District Munsiff, Tirupattur, Vellore District

2. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(PD)No.3325 of 2018

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

rts

C.R.P.(PD)No.3325 of 2018

05.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter